Gastric Cancer in the Elderly

Author(s):  
Emily McCracken ◽  
Sarah Hatch ◽  
Dan G. Blazer
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omer Yalkin ◽  
Nidal Iflazoglu ◽  
Olgun Deniz ◽  
Mustafa Yener Uzunoglu ◽  
Ezgi Isil Turhan

Abstract Objective: The aim of this study was to clarify the prognostic value of the pathological lymph node ratio for elderly and non-elderly gastric cancer patients and to evaluate whether there is a difference in the survival of patients with the same LNR (Lymph Node Ratio).Materials and Methods: A total of 222 patients diagnosed with locally advanced gastric cancer and who underwent gastrectomy were included. The patients were divided into two groups according to age. Clinicopathological properties of the two groups were compared. Potential prognostic factors affecting survival were analyzed. Subsequently, the effect of lymphadenectomy and LNR on survival in both groups was evaluated. Results: Significant differences were detected in terms of the location of primary lesions, hemoglobin and albumin levels between elderly patients and non-elderly patients (p < .05). Overall survival (OS) was significantly worse in elderly patients (22 months vs. 67 months, p<0.001). The survival rates in elderly patients were significantly lower from those of non-elderly in the subgroup LNR Stage 2 (12.1% vs. 47.9 %, P = 0.004) and LNR Stage 3 classification (9.1% vs. 34.1%, P = 0.039). LNR was found to be significant for OS with a cut-off point of 0.18. Conclusion: A survival difference was found between the elderly and non-elderly patients with the same LNR. LNR was found to be an independent factor for survival especially in elderly patients. Survival was found to be further decreased in elderly patients compared to non-elderly patients with increasing LNR.


2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 955-963 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie Liu ◽  
Daniela Molena ◽  
Miloslawa Stem ◽  
Amanda L. Blackford ◽  
David B. Sewell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vikas Dudeja ◽  
Elizabeth B. Habermann ◽  
Wei Zhong ◽  
Todd M. Tuttle ◽  
Selwyn M. Vickers ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Emily McCracken ◽  
Sarah Hatch ◽  
Dan G. Blazer
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. ix229
Author(s):  
D. Egamberdiev ◽  
M. Djuraev ◽  
S. Khudayorov ◽  
O. Nematov ◽  
A. Babaev ◽  
...  

Surgery Today ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 837-841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hitoshi Hara ◽  
Hiroshi Isozaki ◽  
Eiji Nomura ◽  
Keizo Fujii ◽  
Shozo Sako ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15170-e15170
Author(s):  
Akitaka Makiyama ◽  
Tatsuhiro Kajitani ◽  
Hisanobu Oda ◽  
Chinatsu Fujimoto ◽  
Taito Esaki

e15170 Background: In Japan, the elderly population is increasing, and steadily increase the number of deaths in the elderly gastric cancer patients. However, the standard treatment of elderly gastric cancer has not been established, either treatment of S-1 or SP is carried out in the clinical practice, while SP is considered as standard therapy in the young people. Now, we investigated the impact of S-1 and SP on survival time in clinical practice. Methods: Between 2003 and 2012, advanced gastric cancer patients over 70 years of age received S-1 or SP as first line therapy were retrospectively reviewed to investigate clinical outcomes. Patient characteristics analyzed included age, gender, performance status (PS), tumor histology, renal function and metastatic site. In addition, we have analyzed prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. Results: Among 93 patients (pts), 67 pts (72%) received S-1 and 26 pts (28%) received SP. Patient characteristics between the two groups showed no significant differences in gender, histology, metastatic site, or creatinine clearance level, but did show an imbalance in PS (tended with better at SP group) and age (tended with younger at SP group), significantly. Even though the background factors were favorable results in SP group, there were no significant differences in median progression-free survival (median 139 vs. 102 days; p = 0.96) and overall survival (median 330 vs. 263 days; p = 0.55) between S-1 and SP group, respectively. Grade 3-4 neutropenia (10 vs. 27%, p < 0.05) , fatigue (3 vs. 15%, p < 0.05) and Grade 1-2 creatinine increased (9 vs. 31%, p < 0.01) were more frequent in the SP group than in the S-1 group, respectively. According to the multivariate analysis, exposure to CDDP was not independently associated with a better prognosis. Conclusions: Despite the obvious limitations of this analysis, there does not appear to be a benefit for the addition of CDDP in the elderly gastric cancer patients due to the increase of toxicity. A randomized controlled trial in this age group is warranted. We will also report the results of clinically meaningful prognostic factors associated with the primary treatment at annual meeting.


1996 ◽  
Vol 83 (6) ◽  
pp. 836-839 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Tsujitani ◽  
K. Katano ◽  
A. Oka ◽  
M. Ikeguchi ◽  
M. Maeta ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document