Surgical Treatment of the Primary Tumor in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer (Stage IV Disease)

Breast Cancer ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. 385-398
Author(s):  
Mattia Intra
2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1098-1098
Author(s):  
Lejla Hadzikadic Gusic ◽  
John Falcone ◽  
Kandace P. McGuire ◽  
Atilla Soran ◽  
Emilia Diego ◽  
...  

1098 Background: Retrospective studies showing improved survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who undergo surgical treatment of the primary tumor have been criticized for bias in favor of younger, healthier women with lower disease burden. We attempted to identify these biases in our population. Methods: Our institutional cancer registry was queried for patients with MBC from 1994-2010. Demographics, clinical, radiologic and pathologic staging, as well as treatments and outcomes were recorded. Surgical and non-surgical groups were compared for differences in overall survival (OS) and clinicopathologic variables, including comorbidities, using uni- and multivariate analysis. Results: Ninety-one patients with metastatic disease identified within 3 months of initial diagnosis were eligible. 53% (48 pts) had primary breast surgery and 47% (43 pts) did not undergo surgery. Patients in the surgery group were younger on univariate analysis (mean age 53 vs. 62, p<0.01). Neither BMI (mean 30 vs. 29 kg/m²) nor Charlson comorbidity score (mean 6 in both groups) were significantly different, p=NS. Bone metastases were more common in the surgery group (48 vs. 26%) and multiple metastases in the non-surgery group (35 vs. 17%), p<0.05. Patients in the non-surgery group had ≥ 1 visceral metastasis when compared to the surgery group (62 vs. 35%), p<0.05. Higher OS was demonstrated in the surgery group both with Kaplan Meier curves (p<0.05) and univariate analysis (mean 3 vs. 2 yrs, 95% CI 2.6, 3.7), p<0.05. Survival was higher in the surgery group (p<0.01), at 1 year, but this difference did not persist at 3 and 5 years. On multivariate analysis, only difference in age remained significant (p<0.01). Conclusions: Our study supports existing data that women with MBC who have surgical treatment of the primary tumor have an improved survivorship. However, it also suggests a bias towards increased use of surgery in patients who are younger with smaller burden of metastatic disease. We did not find a bias in favor of healthier patients. Further study to determine the mechanism and magnitude of benefit of primary tumor extirpation is still needed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 249-249
Author(s):  
Jennifer J. Griggs ◽  
Thomas Braun ◽  
Dawn Marie Severson ◽  
Elizabeth Marie Layhe ◽  
David H. Gorski ◽  
...  

249 Background: In patients with metastatic breast cancer, clinical practice guidelines include obtaining histologic confirmation of metastases when possible. The purpose of this study was to investigate patterns and correlates of receipt of a confirmatory biopsy. Methods: Data were abstracted from the records of patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer in the Michigan Breast Oncology Quality Initiative (MiBOQI), a statewide registry of 25 health systems. Patients with Stage IV disease at diagnosis were excluded. Analyses investigated associations between receipt of a confirmatory biopsy and disease, clinical and non-clinical factors, and treating health system. Results: Data were available for 1,231 (96%) of eligible patients between 2006 and 2015. Of these, 66% had a confirmatory biopsy; the proportion of patients having a biopsy varied between the 25 sites from 41% to 100% (p = 0.03). In bivariate analyses, younger age (p = 0.02), lower comorbidity (p = 0.007), longer time between the primary and recurrence (p < 0.001), more recent year of recurrence (p = 0.01), having liver, skin, soft tissue, or multiple metastases (p < 0.001), and private or government insurance (p = 0.002) were associated with biopsy. In multivariate analyses, longer time since the primary diagnosis (p < 0.001), more recent year of recurrence (p = 0.03), initial site(s) of recurrence (p < 0.001), and private or government insurance (p = 0.004) remained significant predictors of biopsy. Treatment site was no longer significant (p = 0.14). Minority status, obesity status, and disease characteristics (stage, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2, grade) of the primary were not significant in either bivariate or multivariate analyses. Analyses were repeated without insurance with no change in the other findings. Conclusions: In a statewide collaborative, the proportion of patients having a confirmatory biopsy increased over the study period and was associated with several clinical factors. Insurance was an independent and significant predictor of receipt of what is considered standard care.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (07) ◽  
pp. 422-428
Author(s):  
Rafaela Aparecida Dias de Oliveira ◽  
Lyvia Aparecida Dias de Oliveira ◽  
Marília Davoli Abella Goulart ◽  
Maria Clara Faustino Linhares

Introduction: In advanced breast cancer, local treatment is considered palliative. However, although there are some polemic opinions about the surgical treatment, some of the latest studies have emphasized that in advanced cases primary tumor resection (PTR) is related to better outcomes. This review aims to evaluate how resection of the original tumor impacts women with metastatic breast cancer, considering the most recent studies about this subject. Methods: The search was performed in MEDLINE, Scopus, PMC, Current Contents and Wiley Online Library databases; 23 articles - from 2016 to 2019 - were selected and 11 were included in this review. As inclusion criteria were considered: studies presenting outcomes about resection of the primary tumor, comparison between chemotherapy/ hormone therapy/ targeted cancer therapies and surgical intervention, studies published from 2016 to 2019 and available in English, Spanish or Portuguese. We excluded those which did not approach PTR, did not present outcomes of interest (progression-free survival comparison between PTR and systemic therapy) or only discussed systemic therapy, as well as those published before 2016. Results: It was reported in 6 studies that progression-free survival is better on those who underwent surgery. PTR was also related to longer median overall survival in women submitted to surgery, up to 16 months higher when compared to the ones who were not. Enhanced survival even pertained to surgical groups regardless of tumor size.  Conclusion: Based in the analysis, PTR in metastatic breast cancer can be related to higher overall survival.


Surgery ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 153 (6) ◽  
pp. 771-778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar M. Rashid ◽  
Masayuki Nagahashi ◽  
Subramaniam Ramachandran ◽  
Laura Graham ◽  
Akimitsu Yamada ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (23) ◽  
pp. 7054-7058 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Sofie Schrohl ◽  
Marion E. Meijer-van Gelder ◽  
Mads N. Holten-Andersen ◽  
Ib Jarle Christensen ◽  
Maxime P. Look ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document