Defect Prevention in Requirements Using Human Error Information: An Empirical Study

Author(s):  
Wenhua Hu ◽  
Jeffrey C. Carver ◽  
Vaibhav Anu ◽  
Gursimran Walia ◽  
Gary Bradshaw
2009 ◽  
Vol 28 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 215-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Divakaran Liginlal ◽  
Inkook Sim ◽  
Lara Khansa

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 1054-1070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fuqun HUANG ◽  
Bin LIU

2014 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 373-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inseok Jang ◽  
Ar Ryum Kim ◽  
Wondea Jung ◽  
Poong Hyun Seong

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Chang Hoon Joo ◽  
Tae Gil Kim ◽  
Jeong Oun Lim ◽  
Kyung Sik Kang

2013 ◽  
Vol 257 ◽  
pp. 79-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inseok Jang ◽  
Ar Ryum Kim ◽  
Mohamed Ali Salem Al Harbi ◽  
Seung Jun Lee ◽  
Hyun Gook Kang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Douglas Eddy ◽  
Sundar Krishnamurty ◽  
Ian Grosse ◽  
Michael White ◽  
Damon Blanchette

Abstract Defect prevention is particularly critical in operations such as aircraft assembly or service. Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) procedures have been deployed manually for many years. However, the manual procedures fail to utilize capability to build intelligence into inspection processes that can facilitate elimination of human error. In this work, we introduce an artificial intelligence (AI)-based concept that can iteratively learn to assure zero defects from a given inspection process. This work introduces a schema that can serve as a knowledge management framework in a relational database for instantiation with inspection process information and data from a detection system. A companion algorithm is presented for the case of a wiring harness bracket installation in a fuselage. The schema and algorithm analyze and assess potential defects posed by Foreign Object Debris (FOD) in parallel to the assembly inspection. A closed loop of logic was introduced to enable anomaly detection by this algorithm to assure zero defects.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-111
Author(s):  
Andrey K. Babin ◽  
Andrew R. Dattel ◽  
Margaret F. Klemm

Abstract. Twin-engine propeller aircraft accidents occur due to mechanical reasons as well as human error, such as misidentifying a failed engine. This paper proposes a visual indicator as an alternative method to the dead leg–dead engine procedure to identify a failed engine. In total, 50 pilots without a multi-engine rating were randomly assigned to a traditional (dead leg–dead engine) or an alternative (visual indicator) group. Participants performed three takeoffs in a flight simulator with a simulated engine failure after rotation. Participants in the alternative group identified the failed engine faster than the traditional group. A visual indicator may improve pilot accuracy and performance during engine-out emergencies and is recommended as a possible alternative for twin-engine propeller aircraft.


1996 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Connie R. Wanberg ◽  
John D. Watt ◽  
Deborah J. Rumsey

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document