The Use of Spatial Intensity Distribution Analysis to Examine G Protein-Coupled Receptor Oligomerization

Author(s):  
Richard J. Ward ◽  
Sara Marsango ◽  
John D. Pediani ◽  
Graeme Milligan
2017 ◽  
Vol 474 (11) ◽  
pp. 1879-1895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Ward ◽  
John D. Pediani ◽  
Kaleeckal G. Harikumar ◽  
Laurence J. Miller ◽  
Graeme Milligan

Previous studies have indicated that the G-protein-coupled secretin receptor is present as a homodimer, organized through symmetrical contacts in transmembrane domain IV, and that receptor dimerization is critical for high-potency signalling by secretin. However, whether all of the receptor exists in the dimeric form or if this is regulated is unclear. We used measures of quantal brightness of the secretin receptor tagged with monomeric enhanced green fluorescent protein (mEGFP) and spatial intensity distribution analysis to assess this. Calibration using cells expressing plasma membrane-anchored forms of mEGFP initially allowed us to demonstrate that the epidermal growth factor receptor is predominantly monomeric in the absence of ligand and while wild-type receptor was rapidly converted into a dimeric form by ligand, a mutated form of this receptor remained monomeric. Equivalent studies showed that, at moderate expression levels, the secretin receptor exists as a mixture of monomeric and dimeric forms, with little evidence of higher-order complexity. However, sodium butyrate-induced up-regulation of the receptor resulted in a shift from monomeric towards oligomeric organization. In contrast, a form of the secretin receptor containing a pair of mutations on the lipid-facing side of transmembrane domain IV was almost entirely monomeric. Down-regulation of the secretin receptor-interacting G-protein Gαs did not alter receptor organization, indicating that dimerization is defined specifically by direct protein–protein interactions between copies of the receptor polypeptide, while short-term treatment with secretin had no effect on organization of the wild-type receptor but increased the dimeric proportion of the mutated receptor variant.


2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (S2) ◽  
pp. 128-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.W. Wiseman ◽  
A.G. Godin ◽  
J.L. Swift ◽  
S. Costantino ◽  
A. Ribeiro-da-Silva ◽  
...  

Extended abstract of a paper presented at Microscopy and Microanalysis 2012 in Phoenix, Arizona, USA, July 29 – August 2, 2012.


2013 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 114a
Author(s):  
Ernesto E. Borrero ◽  
Davide Provasi ◽  
Signe Mathiasen ◽  
Dimitrios Stamou ◽  
Marta Filizola

Genomics ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 245-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andria Lee ◽  
B.K. Rana ◽  
H.H. Schiffer ◽  
N.J. Schork ◽  
M.R. Brann ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Annie Barbeau ◽  
Jody L. Swift ◽  
Antoine G. Godin ◽  
Yves De Koninck ◽  
Paul W. Wiseman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document