Quantification of Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Activation and Transactivation by G-Protein-Coupled Receptors Using Spatial Intensity Distribution Analysis (SpIDA)

Author(s):  
Annie Barbeau ◽  
Antoine G. Godin ◽  
Jody L. Swift ◽  
Yves De Koninck ◽  
Paul W. Wiseman ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 474 (11) ◽  
pp. 1879-1895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Ward ◽  
John D. Pediani ◽  
Kaleeckal G. Harikumar ◽  
Laurence J. Miller ◽  
Graeme Milligan

Previous studies have indicated that the G-protein-coupled secretin receptor is present as a homodimer, organized through symmetrical contacts in transmembrane domain IV, and that receptor dimerization is critical for high-potency signalling by secretin. However, whether all of the receptor exists in the dimeric form or if this is regulated is unclear. We used measures of quantal brightness of the secretin receptor tagged with monomeric enhanced green fluorescent protein (mEGFP) and spatial intensity distribution analysis to assess this. Calibration using cells expressing plasma membrane-anchored forms of mEGFP initially allowed us to demonstrate that the epidermal growth factor receptor is predominantly monomeric in the absence of ligand and while wild-type receptor was rapidly converted into a dimeric form by ligand, a mutated form of this receptor remained monomeric. Equivalent studies showed that, at moderate expression levels, the secretin receptor exists as a mixture of monomeric and dimeric forms, with little evidence of higher-order complexity. However, sodium butyrate-induced up-regulation of the receptor resulted in a shift from monomeric towards oligomeric organization. In contrast, a form of the secretin receptor containing a pair of mutations on the lipid-facing side of transmembrane domain IV was almost entirely monomeric. Down-regulation of the secretin receptor-interacting G-protein Gαs did not alter receptor organization, indicating that dimerization is defined specifically by direct protein–protein interactions between copies of the receptor polypeptide, while short-term treatment with secretin had no effect on organization of the wild-type receptor but increased the dimeric proportion of the mutated receptor variant.


Nature ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 383 (6600) ◽  
pp. 547-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Dikic ◽  
George Tokiwa ◽  
Sima Lev ◽  
Sara A. Courtneidge ◽  
Joseph Schlessinger

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 346-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi Wen ◽  
Xuehua Xu ◽  
Wenxiang Sun ◽  
Keqiang Chen ◽  
Miao Pan ◽  
...  

A dogma of innate immunity is that neutrophils use G-protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) for chemoattractant to chase bacteria through chemotaxis and then use phagocytic receptors coupled with tyrosine kinases to destroy opsonized bacteria via phagocytosis. Our current work showed that G-protein–coupled formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) directly mediate neutrophil phagocytosis. Mouse neutrophils lacking formyl peptide receptors (Fpr1/2–/–) are defective in the phagocytosis of Escherichia coli and the chemoattractant N-formyl-Met-Leu-Phe (fMLP)-coated beads. fMLP immobilized onto the surface of a bead interacts with FPRs, which trigger a Ca2+response and induce actin polymerization to form a phagocytic cup for engulfment of the bead. This chemoattractant GPCR/Gi signaling works independently of phagocytic receptor/tyrosine kinase signaling to promote phagocytosis. Thus, in addition to phagocytic receptor-mediated phagocytosis, neutrophils also utilize the chemoattractant GPCR/Gi signaling to mediate phagocytosis to fight against invading bacteria.


2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (52) ◽  
pp. 18494-18507
Author(s):  
Kelly Karl ◽  
Michael D. Paul ◽  
Elena B. Pasquale ◽  
Kalina Hristova

Ligand bias is the ability of ligands to differentially activate certain receptor signaling responses compared with others. It reflects differences in the responses of a receptor to specific ligands and has implications for the development of highly specific therapeutics. Whereas ligand bias has been studied primarily for G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs), there are also reports of ligand bias for receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). However, the understanding of RTK ligand bias is lagging behind the knowledge of GPCR ligand bias. In this review, we highlight how protocols that were developed to study GPCR signaling can be used to identify and quantify RTK ligand bias. We also introduce an operational model that can provide insights into the biophysical basis of RTK activation and ligand bias. Finally, we discuss possible mechanisms underpinning RTK ligand bias. Thus, this review serves as a primer for researchers interested in investigating ligand bias in RTK signaling.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document