IMPACT: Instrument for Supporting Improvement Process Activities

2001 ◽  
pp. 127-136
Author(s):  
Yven Schmidt
Keyword(s):  
Improvement Process

Levels taxation countries the EU and Ukraine’s

2019 ◽  
pp. 131-160
Author(s):  
Helena Borzenko ◽  
Tamara Panfilova ◽  
Mikhail Litvin
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Uniform Distribution ◽  
Tax Burden ◽  
Tax System ◽  
Tax Legislation ◽  
Improvement Process ◽  
Tax Systems ◽  
Historical Comparative ◽  
Different Levels ◽  
The Eu

Purpose articles rassm and experience and benefits systems taxation countries European Union, manifestation iti the main limitations domestic taxlegislation and wired STI their comparisons. In general iti ways the provisiontax reporting countries Eurozone in the appropriate organs, dove STI need theintroduction Ukraine electronic methods receiving and processing such reports.define iti key directions reforming domestic tax legislation. Methodology research is to use aggregate methods: dialectical, statistical, historical, comparative. Scientific novelty is to are provided recommendations for improvement ofefficiency systems taxation of our states in international ratings characterizingtax institutions country. Therefore, despite some problems in legislation heldcomparative study systems taxation EU and Ukraine. Conclucions Coming fromof this, the main directions reforming tax systems Ukraine, in our opinion,today should become: improvement process administration, reduce scales evasiontaxes, provision more uniform distribution tax burden between taxpayers, themaximum cooperation tax bodies different levels as well adjustment systemselectronic interactions tax authorities and payers, tax system must contain ascan less unfounded benefits, consistent with the general by politics pricing.

In-Line Defect to Bitmap Signature Correlation: A Shortcut to Physical FA Results

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Segal ◽  
Arman Sagatelian ◽  
Bob Hodgkins ◽  
Tom Ho ◽  
Ben Chu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Failure Analysis ◽  
Integrated Circuit ◽  
Failure Mechanisms ◽  
Memory Devices ◽  
Line Defect ◽  
Yield Improvement ◽  
Electrical Test ◽  
Large Numbers ◽  
Improvement Process ◽  
Existing Data

Abstract Physical failure analysis (FA) of integrated circuit devices that fail electrical test is an important part of the yield improvement process. This article describes how the analysis of existing data from arrayed devices can be used to replace physical FA of some electrical test failures, and increase the value of physical FA results. The discussion is limited to pre-repair results. The key is to use classified bitmaps and determine which signature classification correlates to which type of in-line defect. Using this technique, physical failure mechanisms can be determined for large numbers of failures on a scale that would be unfeasible with de-processing and physical FA. If the bitmaps are classified, two-way correlation can be performed: in-line defect to bitmap failure, as well as bitmap signature to in-line defect. Results also demonstrate the value of analyzing memory devices failures, even those that can be repaired, to gain understanding of defect mechanisms.

scholarly journals Cognitive–Evaluative Dimension of Pain in Neuropathic Pain Relapse in Sciatica: A Case Report

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (7) ◽  
pp. 658
Author(s):  
Tsubasa Kawasaki ◽  
Takuya Yada ◽  
Masahiro Ohira
Keyword(s):  
Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Acute Phase ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Evaluative Dimension ◽  
Long Duration ◽  
Improvement Process ◽  
Insight Into

The cognitive–evaluative (C–E) dimension of pain is commonly observed in patients with a relatively long duration of pain. However, little is known about the effects of pain relapse on the C–E dimension of pain. Moreover, the improvement process of the C–E dimension of pain following treatment is unknown. The objective of this case report was to (a) demonstrate that the C–E dimension was affected in the acute phase of neuropathic pain in cases of pain relapse, and (b) demonstrate the improvement process of the C–E dimension of pain. A woman was diagnosed with low back pain (LBP) and sciatica. The patient had previously experienced symptoms of LBP and sciatica; thus, this episode was a case of pain relapse. At the beginning of rehabilitation, the C–E dimension of pain was present in addition to the sensory–discriminative (S–D) dimension of pain. It was observed that improvement of the C–E dimension of pain was delayed in comparison with that of the S–D dimension of pain. The C–E dimension of pain was observed with pain relapse even though it was in the acute phase of pain. This case provides a novel insight into the C–E dimension of pain. Moreover, the delay in improving the C–E dimension of pain indicates a difference in the improvement process for each pain dimension.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document