Alfred Adler und Friedrich Nietzsche

Widersprüche ◽  
2000 ◽  
pp. 435-448
Author(s):  
Josef Rattner
2015 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 415-425
Author(s):  
Mark H. Stone

1957 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROBERT W. WHITE
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
John Marmysz

This introductory chapter examines the “problem” of nihilism, beginning with its philosophical origins in the ideas of Plato, Immanuel Kant, Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger. It is argued that film is an inherently nihilistic medium involving the evocation of illusory worlds cut loose from objective reality. This nihilism of film is distinguished from nihilism in film; the nihilistic content also present in some (but not all) movies. Criticisms of media nihilism by authors such as Thomas Hibbs and Darren Ambrose are examined. It is then argued, contrary to such critics, that cinematic nihilism is not necessarily degrading or destructive. Because the nihilism of film encourages audiences to linger in the presence of nihilism in film, cinematic nihilism potentially trains audiences to learn the positive lessons of nihilism while remaining safely detached from the sorts of dangers depicted on screen.


Author(s):  
Vanessa Lemm

Readers of Giorgio Agamben would agree that the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900) is not one of his primary interlocutors. As such, Agamben’s engagement with Nietzsche is different from the French reception of Nietzsche’s philosophy in Michel Foucault, Gilles Deleuze and Georges Bataille, as well as in his contemporary Italian colleague Roberto Esposito, for whom Nietzsche’s philosophy is a key point of reference in their thinking of politics beyond sovereignty. Agamben’s stance towards the thought of Nietzsche may seem ambiguous to some readers, in particular with regard to his shifting position on Nietzsche’s much-debated vision of the eternal recurrence of the same.


2008 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-199
Author(s):  
KATHRYN WALLS

According to the ‘Individual Psychology’ of Alfred Adler (1870–1937), Freud's contemporary and rival, everyone seeks superiority. But only those who can adapt their aspirations to meet the needs of others find fulfilment. Children who are rejected or pampered are so desperate for superiority that they fail to develop social feeling, and endanger themselves and society. This article argues that Mahy's realistic novels invite Adlerian interpretation. It examines the character of Hero, the elective mute who is the narrator-protagonist of The Other Side of Silence (1995) , in terms of her experience of rejection. The novel as a whole, it is suggested, stresses the destructiveness of the neurotically driven quest for superiority. Turning to Mahy's supernatural romances, the article considers novels that might seem to resist the Adlerian template. Focusing, in particular, on the young female protagonists of The Haunting (1982) and The Changeover (1984), it points to the ways in which their magical power is utilised for the sake of others. It concludes with the suggestion that the triumph of Mahy's protagonists lies not so much in their generally celebrated ‘empowerment’, as in their transcendence of the goal of superiority for its own sake.


2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (102) ◽  
pp. 81-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard E. Watts

Los defensores de la Psicología Positiva, cuando abordan las perspectivas fundacionales, suelen identificar a Abraham Maslow, Carl Rogers y Gordon Allport como precursores y predecesores. Este artículo demuestra que la Psicología Individual de Alfred Adler precedió a estos precursores de la Psicología Positiva y se podría considerar como la Psicología Positiva original. Tras un breve resumen de las ideas clave de la Psicología Individual de Adler, los autores presentan específicamente los dos principios fundacionales de la teoría de Adler que se repiten particularmente en la Psicología Positiva y a continuación ofrecen una perspectiva más amplia de las bases comunes notables entre las ideas teóricas tardías de Adler y el movimiento de la Psicología Positiva.


2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (102) ◽  
pp. 49-59
Author(s):  
Yvonne Schürer
Keyword(s):  

Encontrar la manera de involucrar a la pareja en hacerse más receptiva a las necesidades del otro puede ser un gran reto en la terapia de pareja, al igual que en aprender estrategias más eficaces de resolución de conflictos. Mediante un estudio de caso, se ilustra una forma estructurada y a la vez flexible de conducir el diálogo con los pacientes, y cómo el terapeuta puede dar sentido al caos aparente y, a continuación, facilitar y promover el entendimiento mutuo y la receptividad de la pareja en conflicto. La base teórica de este enfoque para la resolución de conflictos es la Psicología Individual de Alfred Adler. Conceptos como el arraigo social y la necesidad de pertenencia, sentimientos de inferioridad, y los esfuerzos para compensar los sentimientos de inferioridad se abordan desde la perspectiva de la relación de pareja. El enfoque descrito proporciona una técnica para el descubrimiento y la negociación de las luchas de poder intrínsecas a los conflictos de la pareja, y muestra cómo los cónyuges pueden encontrar el valor para relacionarse de una manera que concilia las necesidades personales con las del otro y las de la relación.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document