AC2001-OP: An Arc-Consistency Algorithm for Constraint Satisfaction Problems

2010 ◽  
pp. 219-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlene Arangú ◽  
Miguel A. Salido ◽  
Federico Barber
Keyword(s):  
Constraint Satisfaction ◽  
Constraint Satisfaction Problems ◽  
Arc Consistency

scholarly journals A fine-grained arc-consistency algorithm for non-normalized constraint satisfaction problems

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 733-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlene Arangú ◽  
Miguel Salido
Keyword(s):  
Constraint Satisfaction ◽  
Constraint Programming ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Search Space ◽  
Constraint Satisfaction Problems ◽  
Fine Grained ◽  
Arc Consistency ◽  
Life Problems ◽  
Programming Techniques ◽  
Np Complete

A fine-grained arc-consistency algorithm for non-normalized constraint satisfaction problems Constraint programming is a powerful software technology for solving numerous real-life problems. Many of these problems can be modeled as Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs) and solved using constraint programming techniques. However, solving a CSP is NP-complete so filtering techniques to reduce the search space are still necessary. Arc-consistency algorithms are widely used to prune the search space. The concept of arc-consistency is bidirectional, i.e., it must be ensured in both directions of the constraint (direct and inverse constraints). Two of the most well-known and frequently used arc-consistency algorithms for filtering CSPs are AC3 and AC4. These algorithms repeatedly carry out revisions and require support checks for identifying and deleting all unsupported values from the domains. Nevertheless, many revisions are ineffective, i.e., they cannot delete any value and consume a lot of checks and time. In this paper, we present AC4-OP, an optimized version of AC4 that manages the binary and non-normalized constraints in only one direction, storing the inverse founded supports for their later evaluation. Thus, it reduces the propagation phase avoiding unnecessary or ineffective checking. The use of AC4-OP reduces the number of constraint checks by 50% while pruning the same search space as AC4. The evaluation section shows the improvement of AC4-OP over AC4, AC6 and AC7 in random and non-normalized instances.

scholarly journals Constraint programming viewed as rule-based programming

2001 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 713-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
KRZYSZTOF R. APT ◽  
ERIC MONFROY
Keyword(s):  
Constraint Satisfaction ◽  
Constraint Programming ◽  
Constraint Satisfaction Problems ◽  
Rule Based ◽  
Local Consistency ◽  
Arc Consistency ◽  
Computation Process ◽  
Rule Based Approach ◽  
Rule Consistency

We study here a natural situation when constraint programming can be entirely reduced to rule-based programming. To this end we explain first how one can compute on constraint satisfaction problems using rules represented by simple first-order formulas. Then we consider constraint satisfaction problems that are based on predefined, explicitly given constraints. To solve them we first derive rules from these explicitly given constraints and limit the computation process to a repeated application of these rules, combined with labeling. We consider two types of rule here. The first type, that we call equality rules, leads to a new notion of local consistency, called rule consistency that turns out to be weaker than arc consistency for constraints of arbitrary arity (called hyper-arc consistency in Marriott & Stuckey (1998)). For Boolean constraints rule consistency coincides with the closure under the well-known propagation rules for Boolean constraints. The second type of rules, that we call membership rules, yields a rule-based characterization of arc consistency. To show feasibility of this rule-based approach to constraint programming, we show how both types of rules can be automatically generated, as CHR rules of Frühwirth (1995). This yields an implementation of this approach to programming by means of constraint logic programming. We illustrate the usefulness of this approach to constraint programming by discussing various examples, including Boolean constraints, two typical examples of many valued logics, constraints dealing with Waltz's language for describing polyhedral scenes, and Allen's qualitative approach to temporal logic.

FACTORED ARC CONSISTENCY FOR RETE MATCH

1993 ◽  
Vol 02 (02) ◽  
pp. 277-306
Author(s):  
MARK W. PERLIN
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Constraint Satisfaction ◽  
Production Systems ◽  
Constraint Satisfaction Problems ◽  
Unified Framework ◽  
Call Graph ◽  
Quadratic Dependence ◽  
Arc Consistency ◽  
Common Framework ◽  
Graph Factorization

RETE match for production systems and Arc Consistency (AC) filtering are two efficient AI algorithms that are designed for particular constraint satisfaction problems (CSP). Interestingly, it is possible to integrate the two within a common framework, and provide RETE with the lookahead advantages of AC. Unfortunately, the resulting quadratic dependence of AC on working memory (WM) size precludes the application of AC to RETE, since RETE responds to incremental changes in WM. Recent results in AC graph factorization, however, reduce the quadratic dependence to just linear for certain classes of problems, including RETE. In this paper, we present RETE and AC within the unified framework of Call-Graph Caching (CGC) evaluation. We describe factored arc consistency (FAC) and its use in an integrated FAC/RETE algorithm that provides RETE match with AC lookahead. We discuss our implementations, promising initial empirical results, and explore FAC/RETE’s applicability conditions and extensions. We conclude that incorporating factored AC into RETE match is an interesting and potentially useful application of arc consistency methods to the RETE CSP.

PREPROCESSING QUANTIFIED CONSTRAINT SATISFACTION PROBLEMS WITH VALUE REORDERING AND DIRECTIONAL ARC AND PATH CONSISTENCY

2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (02) ◽  
pp. 321-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
KOSTAS STERGIOU
Keyword(s):  
Constraint Satisfaction ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Constraint Satisfaction Problem ◽  
Constraint Satisfaction Problems ◽  
Combinatorial Problems ◽  
Arc Consistency ◽  
Solution Methods ◽  
Speed Up ◽  
Phase Transition Region ◽  
The Impact

The Quantified Constraint Satisfaction Problem (QCSP) is an extension of the CSP that can be used to model combinatorial problems containing contingency or uncertainty. It allows for universally quantified variables that can model uncertain actions and events, such as the unknown weather for a future party, or an opponent's next move in a game. Although interest in QCSPs is increasing in recent years, the development of techniques for handling QCSPs is still at an early stage. For example, although it is well known that local consistencies are of primary importance in CSPs, only arc consistency has been extended to quantified problems. In this paper we contribute towards the development of solution methods for QCSPs in two ways. First, by extending directional arc and path consistency, two popular local consistencies in constraint satisfaction, to the quantified case and proposing an algorithm that achieves these consistencies. Second, by showing how value ordering heuristics can be utilized to speed up computation in QCSPs. We study the impact of preprocessing QCSPs with value reordering and directional quantified arc and path consistency by running experiments on randomly generated problems. Results show that our preprocessing methods can significantly speed up the QCSP solving process, especially on hard instances from the phase transition region.

Partial (Neighbourhood) Singleton Arc Consistency for Constraint Satisfaction Problems

2020 ◽  
Vol 174 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 311-344
Author(s):  
Richard J. Wallace
Keyword(s):  
Constraint Satisfaction ◽  
Search Algorithms ◽  
Constraint Satisfaction Problems ◽  
Experimental Results ◽  
Full Version ◽  
Arc Consistency ◽  
Considerable Promise ◽  
Heuristic Strategies ◽  
Backtrack Search

Algorithms based on singleton arc consistency (SAC) show considerable promise for improving backtrack search algorithms for constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs). The drawback is that even the most efficient of them is still comparatively expensive. Even when limited to preprocessing, they give overall improvement only when problems are quite difficult to solve with more typical procedures such as maintained arc consistency (MAC). The present work examines a form of partial SAC and neighbourhood SAC (NSAC) in which a subset of the variables in a CSP are chosen to be made SAC-consistent or neighbourhood-SAC-consistent. Such consistencies, despite their partial character, are still well-characterized in that algorithms have unique fixpoints. Heuristic strategies for choosing an effective subset of variables are described and tested, the best being choice by highest degree and a more complex strategy of choosing by constraint weight after random probing. Experimental results justify the claim that these methods can be nearly as effective as the corresponding full version of the algorithm in terms of values discarded or problems proven unsatisfiable, while significantly reducing the effort required to achieve this.

SPECIFIC CONSTRAINT HANDLING IN CONSTRAINT SATISFACTION PROBLEMS

1994 ◽  
Vol 03 (01) ◽  
pp. 79-96
Author(s):  
BING LIU
Keyword(s):  
Constraint Satisfaction ◽  
Constraint Satisfaction Problems ◽  
Constraint Handling ◽  
Consistency Check ◽  
Arc Consistency ◽  
Individual Constraint ◽  
Network Consistency

Abundant literatures exist on consistency techniques for solving Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs). These literatures, however, focused mainly on finding efficient general techniques to achieve network consistency and to solve CSPs. So far, many techniques have been reported, e.g., node consistency, arc consistency, path consistency, k-consistency, forward checking, lookahead, partial lookahead, etc. Not enough attention has been given to individual constraints, and how constraint specific features may be exploited for more efficient consistency check. Many types of constraints exist in real problems, and each has its own features. These features may allow specific consistency techniques to be designed such that they are more efficient than the general algorithms. To analyze this issue, we divide a consistency algorithm into three parts: (1) activating constraints for check; (2) selecting the next constraint to be checked; and (3) checking the selected constraint. We will discuss how constraint specific features may influence each of these aspects and how special handling techniques may be designed to improve the efficiency. In order to allow these individual constraint handling techniques to be used, a new consistency algorithm is also proposed.

Efficient Singleton Consistency by Combining Forward Checking and Bound Consistency

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (04) ◽  
pp. 1460017
Author(s):  
Jinsong Guo ◽  
Hongbo Li ◽  
Zhanshan Li ◽  
Yonggang Zhang ◽  
Xianghua Jia
Keyword(s):  
Constraint Satisfaction ◽  
Search Algorithm ◽  
Computational Cost ◽  
Search Space ◽  
Search Algorithms ◽  
Constraint Satisfaction Problems ◽  
Local Consistency ◽  
Arc Consistency ◽  
Strong Bound

Maintaining local consistencies can improve the efficiencies of the search algorithms solving constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs). Comparing with arc consistency which is the most widely used local consistency, stronger local consistencies can make the search space smaller while they require higher computational cost. In this paper, we make an attempt on the compromise between the pruning ability and the computational cost. A new local consistency called singleton strong bound consistency (SSBC) and its light version, light SSBC, are proposed. The search algorithm maintaining light SSBC can outperform MAC on a considerable number of problems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document