A Collaborative Distributed Control and Building Performance Simulation Based on Systems Engineering Practice

Author(s):  
Azzedine Yahiaoui ◽  
Abd-El-Kader Sahraoui
2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 652-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Burak Gunay ◽  
Weiming Shen ◽  
Brent Huchuk ◽  
Chunsheng Yang ◽  
Scott Bucking ◽  
...  

This paper presents a building performance simulation-based investigation to better understand the energy and comfort performance benefits of early detection of common sensor and actuator faults. Five types of air-handling unit faults and four types of zone-level faults were implemented to the energy management system application of the building performance simulation tool EnergyPlus. During 50-year simulation periods, the faults were randomly permitted to affect 75 different components of an archetype medium-sized office building model. The sensitivity of the simulation results with respect to three variables was studied: fault recurrence period, fault repair period, and discomfort threshold for simulated complaints. The results indicate that the energy use intensity and the predicted percentage of dissatisfied exhibit a power–law relationship with time, in which most of the performance reductions occur in the first 10 years. If the work-orders are issued only upon occupant complaints, the faults were estimated to cause a 16–62% increase in the energy use intensity for heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning and a 11–38% increase in the predicted percentage of dissatisfied at the end of the 50-year simulation periods. The results indicate that if the faults can be detected within a month after their first appearance, almost all their detrimental effects on a building’s energy and comfort performance can be mitigated. Practical application: The methodology and results presented in this article are of practical use for those who study on-going commissioning, fault detection and diagnostics, and energy management systems in buildings. The simulation-based parametric analysis approach can be used to estimate the range of energy and comfort savings expected through early detection of common sensor and actuator faults in commercial buildings. Insights gathered from such an analysis can be used in planning the frequency of retro-commissioning and investments for automated fault detection and diagnostics systems.


2017 ◽  
Vol 125 ◽  
pp. 49-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Mitterhofer ◽  
Georg Ferdinand Schneider ◽  
Sebastian Stratbücker ◽  
Klaus Sedlbauer

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 735-746 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucie Merlier ◽  
Loïc Frayssinet ◽  
Kévyn Johannes ◽  
Frédéric Kuznik

2021 ◽  
pp. 111251
Author(s):  
Facundo Bre ◽  
Rayner Maurício e Silva Machado ◽  
Linda K. Lawrie ◽  
Drury B. Crawley ◽  
Roberto Lamberts

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaohuan Xie ◽  
Zhonghua Gou

INTRODUCTION Current green building practice has been largely advanced by an integrated design process. This integrated design process involves multiple disciplines, such as architecture, civil, mechanical, and electrical engineering. The design method heavily relies on utilizing building performance simulation to illustrate how design parameters affect the energy consumption and quality of the indoor environment before actual design decisions are made (Anderson, 2014). The architectural design tools in the integrated design process supersede traditional geometrical exploration instruments, such as Sketchup, Revit, ArchiCad, and Rhino (Negendahl, 2015). More building performance simulating tools, such as Ecotect, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), Radiance, and EnergyPlus, have been developed to help architects measure building performance (e.g., natural ventilation, daylighting, solar radiation, and energy uses) in the design process and attain green building standards such as Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED). The information presented by these tools guide architects at a certain level in achieving green building goals. However, building simulation is generally beyond the architect's knowledge domain. Many architects have difficulty in understanding these technical terms and models, as well as their design implications. Therefore, specific consultants have emerged to help architects grasp the meanings of these numbers and models, which require architects to implement a high level of design collaboration and coordination (Aksamija, 2015; Gou & Lau, 2014). Simulation consultants can work in parallel with architects at the early design stage to intervene in the conceptual and schematic design; they may also work behind architects to verify the building performance after the design is finished and make their design green through technical alterations. Most existing literature argues for an early intervention of building performance simulation in the architectural design process and explores different algorithms or models for optimal intervention (Degens, Scholzen, & Odenbreit, 2015; Sick, Schade, Mourtada, Uh, & Grausam, 2014; Svetlana Olbina & Yvan Beliveau, 2007). However, the difference between early intervention and late verification is often not investigated. Few qualitative studies can help understand how the building performance simulation is actually implemented, and how it influences the quality of design solutions in addition to the quantity of performance outcomes. The current research presents two case studies that compare building performance simulation as an early intervention and a late verification tool in the architectural design process, which contextualizes the building simulation research in real building practices.


Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria-Mar Fernandez-Antolin ◽  
José-Manuel del-Río ◽  
Fernando del Ama Gonzalo ◽  
Roberto-Alonso Gonzalez-Lezcano

This paper examines the actual knowledge regarding Building Performance Simulation Tools (BPSTs) of recent graduate architects in Spain. BPSTs quantify aspects of building performance that are relevant to design, construction, and operation. Recent graduate architects are those who have been awarded a first degree from a university or college and face their first professional experience. This article aims to identify the deficiencies within the current curricula of Spanish universities relating to BPSTs. The authors have surveyed 171 recent graduate architects, and the analysis of the data reveals the deficiencies in university education. Regarding the collected results, the Spanish university syllabi must undergo necessary modifications to encourage the use of simulation as a part of university training courses. The incorporation of energy simulation in such training courses can provide recent graduate architects with tools that would assist them during the design stage. The use of these tools is key in the development of innovative pedagogy-based teaching materials for the courses. In this sense, the present work aims to delve into the usage deficiencies associated with BPSTs and propose ways in which to bridge the gap between higher education and first professional experiences.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document