Mission, Finance, and Innovation: The Similarities and Differences Between Social Entrepreneurship and Social Business

2014 ◽  
pp. 23-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Beckmann ◽  
Anica Zeyen ◽  
Anna Krzeminska
Author(s):  
Lyudmyla Bilanych ◽  
Myroslava Kulesha-Liubinets ◽  
Tetiana Kulinich

Abstract. Nowadays the most characteristic are intense and rapid globalization, European integration processes, international social and economic cooperation and, in addition, popularization of new ideas about democracy, professional honesty, social and environmental responsibility and governance in entrepreneurship. Taken together, these factors are complementary and can advance for sustainable development of Ukraine. In this context sustainable economic development is symbiosis of an effective commercial and social business. The achievement of the optimum balance between profit maximization of Ukrainians’ companies in a long run and meeting the population’s socio-economic needs, such as enhancement of the quality of life is now recognized as a major challenge for our country. This situation is particularly complicated by the case of permanent complex crises and unsuccessful reformation of national public government. The article is devoted to the analysis of considerable theoretical and practical significance of social business as a primary entrepreneurship by which sustainable economic development of Ukraine is achieved. Social business is essential to strengthen the social responsibility, social awareness and civil unity among the market participants. These issues have been outlined in this science paper by authors. Comparison, methods of abstraction, analysis and generalization, graphic and tabular modeling are the research methods which were used in the article. In this science paper the concept of “social business”, the main features, basic principles and functions of the social entrepreneurship and impacts of the social business sector on sustainable economic development of Ukraine are analyzed by authors. So, based on theoretical and methodological research, it was determined that sustainable development is our country’s strategic goal. In the meantime, social business development is one of the key vectors to achieve defined objective. Key words: Sustainable development goals of Ukraine, social business, social entrepreneurship, incentives for development of social business in Ukraine.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Ridwan Saifuddin

Penelitian ini mendalami proses bisnis BUM Desa yang dipilih, untuk mengetahui praktik bisnis BUM Desa yang dinilai berkinerja baik di Provinsi Lampung, sebagai lembaga ekonomi yang berorientasi keuntungan finansial (profit business) sekaligus berorientasi sosial (social business), dengan metode penelitian kualitatif deskriptif. Profil BUM Desa yang diangkat dalam kajian ini adalah BUM Desa Swadesa Arta Mandiri, Desa Wonomarto, Kabupaten Lampung Utara, yang memiliki beberapa unit usaha, seperti mengelola wahana wisata air, perdagangan, pasar desa, pengelolaan sampah, serta lembaga keuangan. Idealnya dua fungsi BUM Desa sebagai lembaga profit dan lembaga sosial bisa berjalan sinergis. Kemampuan pengelola BUM Desa untuk mengintegrasikan fungsi sosial dan profit secara baik, akan melahirkan kinerja lembaga yang lebih optimal dalam memberikan manfaat ekonomi dan sosial bagi masyarkat desa. Konsep social entrepreneurship baik dikembangkan oleh pengelola BUM Desa. Ukuran keberhasilan BUM Desa tidak semata dalam bentuk keuntungan uang, melainkan lebih pada kemampuannya menggerakkan dan mendinamisasi roda perekonomian desa, sehingga dapat meningkatkan kapasitas ekonomi warganya.


Author(s):  
Stasė Navasaitienė ◽  
Marharyta Vishniakova ◽  
Rasa Rukuižienė

The article presents the overview of the approaches and models, which are important in determination of social entrepreneurship driving forces. The research problem is arised for getting more wide view about activities and motivation issues of social entrepreneurs in the Republic of Belarus. The research aims to examine the individual features and motives of social entrepreneurs in profile of their personality related to appropriate business models for social entrepreneurship development. The broad and narrow approaches are used to get an answer about the perspectives of social entrepreneurship in this country. The objectives of research are arised as follow: 1) define approaches of social entrepreneurs‘ for individual profiling; 2) describe the motives of entrepreneurs to start activities for social business; 3) highlight the business models of social enterprises‘ establishment. The methods of research: monographic, descriptive and meta-analysis of scientific literature. As well as the analysis of the empirical data is produced by in-depth interviews with the heads of organizations and enterprises engaged in social entrepreneurship in the Republic of Belarus (in-depth interviews were conducted in the period from 15th August to 15th November 2015, and 10 experts were involved). The key findings of research: marked a „broad“ and „narrow“ approaches for higlighting the profile of social entrepreneurs; approved the consequences that social entrepreneurs are high motivated and biased towards achieving socially beneficial purposes rather than material well-being; identified the circumstances about the existance of individual and organizational models for establishment social enterprises.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 76
Author(s):  
Dewi Cahyani Puspitasari

The existence of social entrepreneurship movement then might be the answer to generate the entrepreneurs capable of identifying new ways, establishing new business to generate social values and coping with various social issues. The youth, in this case, becomes the drive of social entrepreneurship movement. They have an entrepreneurship spirit based upon their competence not only to build a business and obtain the profit for themselves but also to run their business for the improvement of social and economic state of society. This research is an initial study focused on the individual to identify the successful characters and the innovative process of the young sociopreneur in initiating and developing a social business. This study used a method of case study with the main research subject of momsociopreneur ‘Sanggar ASI. The primary and secondary. The results of this study showed that the process to be sociopreneur required various skills and competences correlated to the performance of the pioneering social business. From the beginning, confidence becomes the main power that is able to mobilize to actively act in solving the social problems such as the failure of breastfeeding among mothers or the lack of breastfeeding. The preferences of values and norm can be internalized in all social business including in work place, partner network, clients or community as the beneficiaries of social service and family institution. In the process of developing their social business, the sociopreneurs have an adaptive competence in responding any innovation. Thus, momsociopreneur ‘Sanggar ASI can be the role model for the youth especially for females attempting to grow their self-potential to participate and answer the problems and social needs of community.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Isa Nsereko ◽  
Alex Bignotti ◽  
Mohamed Farhoud

Subject area This case focusses on social innovation and social entrepreneurship in Africa, specifically looking at behavioural characteristics of social entrepreneurs, their motivations to create social value and the application of personal initiative theory. The case discusses the self-starting proactiveness and innovation traits of the social entrepreneur. The social business model canvas will be used to analyse the social enterprise’s business model. Study level/applicability Students of social entrepreneurship, development studies, sustainable livelihoods and asset-based development. It is useful for customised or short programmes on social entrepreneurship or for students with a background in business wanting to understand social enterprise as a vehicle for social and economic change. As such, this case is written for Business Management and Entrepreneurship undergraduates or students of elective courses in social entrepreneurship (“understanding” and “remembering” learning activities under Bloom’s taxonomy). When personal initiative theory is used, the case provides an initial understanding of social entrepreneurship in a less developed context for post-graduate students and may be used for higher-order learning activities (“analysing” and “applying”). Case overview The case tells the story of Dr Engr Moses Musaazi, who is a Social Entrepreneur and Managing Director of Technology for Tomorrow (T4T). Troubled with the persistent social problems in his country. Musaazi, through T4T, strived for social innovations to reduce school dropouts of Ugandan girls. While exploring Moses’ journey for solving persistent social problems through social innovations, students will be able to understand, remember, analyse and apply Dees’ (2001) social entrepreneurial behaviours and Santos’ (2012) theory of social entrepreneurship. The case discusses what motivates African social entrepreneurs to start a social venture (Ghalwash, Tolba, & Ismail, 2017). Students will apply personal initiative theory to identify the social entrepreneurial behaviours displayed in the creation of social ventures. To exemplify and analyse the different components of social ventures’ business model, the social business model canvas by Sparviero (2019) will be introduced. Expected learning outcomes The teaching objectives are Objective 1. Students are able to remember, understand, identify and apply the social entrepreneurial behaviours as defined by Dees (2001) and the elements of Santos’ (2012) theory of social entrepreneurship to Dr Moses Musaazi’s case as a social entrepreneur. Objective 2. Students remember, understand and identify what motivates social entrepreneurs in less developed economies to create social value (Ghalwash et al., 2017). Objective 3. Early-stage postgraduate students are able to apply and analyse (also evaluate and create for higher-level post-graduates) personal initiative theory to explain the emergence of social entrepreneurial behaviour and especially how innovation, self-starting and proactiveness may lead to social entrepreneurial venture start-up (Frese, Kring, Soose, & Zempel, 1996). Objective 4. Students use the social business model canvas (Sparviero, 2019) as a tool to understand, analyse and improve a social-enterprise business model. Supplementary materials Supplementary learning materials are provided in the Teaching Note (Table 1). Table1, which includes videos and their description. Also, a link to Uganda’s sustainable development index is provided (the focus is sustainable development goals [SDGs] 3: Good health and well-being, SDG 4: Quality Education, SDG 5: Gender equality, SDG 10: Reduced inequalities). Subject code CSS 3: Entrepreneurship.


2021 ◽  
Vol 168 (4) ◽  
pp. 123-125
Author(s):  
Petra Mund

Auch in Deutschland ist unter der Überschrift Social Entrepreneurship vermehrt ein Unternehmertum zu beobachten, dessen unternehmerischer Fokus auf der innovativen Lösung sozialer Probleme liegt. Bei näherer Betrachtung zeigen sich große Schnittmengen, die diese - auch als Social Startups oder social business bezeichneten - Unternehmen oftmals mit den klassischen (Wohlfahrts-)Organisationen der Sozialen Arbeit und ihren Zielen haben. Gleichzeitig können jedoch auch Unterschiede und Herausforderungen identifiziert werden. Dieser Beitrag diskutiert, ausgehend von einer begrifflichen Annäherung an Social Entrepreneurship, die Gemeinsamkeiten, Unterschiede und Herausforderungen, die sich Soziale Arbeit und Social Entrepreneuership auf ihren Wegen zum gleichen Ziel: der Lösung sozialer Probleme, stellen.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document