Primary Prevention of Sudden Death in Post-Infarction Patients: When ICD Implantation is Really Cost-effective

2004 ◽  
pp. 497-504
Author(s):  
S. C. Hammill
Keyword(s):  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Sudden Death ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Icd Implantation

Abstract 1158: Sudden Death in Children with Cardiomyopathy: Long Term Follow-Up from a National Population-Based Study of Childhood Cardiomyopathy

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara Bharucha ◽  
Andrew M Davis ◽  
Christian Turner ◽  
Robert Justo ◽  
Terry Robertson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Sudden Death ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Z Score ◽  
Icd Implantation ◽  
Population Based Study ◽  
Increased Risk

Introduction Better data regarding the incidence and risk factors for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in children with cardiomyopathy (CM) is critical in defining appropriate primary prevention strategies. Methods The National Australian Childhood Cardiomyopathy Study is a prospective cohort study, including all children in Australia with primary CM diagnosed at 0 – 10 years of age, between 1987–1997. SCD was defined as sudden and unexpected death in children who were not hospitalized and not in congestive heart failure at the time of death. Nine subjects with sudden death as presenting symptom were excluded. Indexed echocardiographic measurements at latest follow-up were compared between subjects with SCD and survivors. Results Study criteria were met by 291 children. Mean duration of follow-up was 9.2 years. The incidence of sudden death relative to each CM type, for all cases and as a proportion of deaths, is shown in the Table : Incidence of SCD by CM type. SCD incidence was significantly associated with CM type, for all cases ( p = 0.006) and when only those subjects who died were considered ( p = 0.005), with LVNC and RCM having up to 4 times the risk of other CM types. Children with familial DCM had a significantly higher rate of SCD than subjects with non-familial CM (12% vs 3%; p = 0.028), however, familial CM was not a risk factor in other CM types. DCM SCD subjects had larger LVEDd Z score than survivors (median 5.53 vs 1.16; p <0.0001) and lower FS Z score (median −9.23 vs −0.51; p = 0.0025). HCM SCD subjects had thicker LVPW dimension Z scores than survivors (median 4.63 vs 1.18; p = 0.007). Twelve subjects (2 DCM, 8 HCM and 2 LVNC) underwent ICD implantation (8/12 for primary prevention). Conclusions: This population based study defines new risk factors for sudden death in children with CM. RCM is well known to have a high incidence of SCD. In addition, children with LVNC and those with DCM who have severe dilatation, systolic dysfunction or familial DCM are at increased risk of sudden death.

Abstract 12621: Gender Differences Among Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators Recipients in the Setting of Primary Prevention

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eloi Marijon ◽  
Rui Providencia ◽  
Pascal Defaye ◽  
Didier Klug ◽  
Daniel Gras ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Dilated Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Specific Interaction ◽  
Severe Heart Failure ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Functional Class ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators ◽  
Icd Implantation ◽  
Cardioverter Defibrillators

Background: Data regarding sex specificities in the use, benefits and complications of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in primary prevention in the real-world European setting are sparse. Methods: Using a large multicentric cohort of consecutive patients referred for ICD implantation for primary prevention (2002-2012), in the setting of coronary artery disease or dilated cardiomyopathy, we examined potential sex differences in subjects’ characteristics and outcomes. Results: Of 5,539 patients, only 837 (15.1%) were women and 53.8% received cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D). Compared to men, women presented a significantly higher proportion of dilated cardiomyopathy (60.2% vs. 36.2%, P120ms: 74.6% vs. 68.5%, P=0.003), higher New York Heart Association functional class (2.5±0.7 vs. 2.4±0.7, P=0.003) and lower prevalence of atrial fibrillation (18.7% vs. 24.9%, P<0.001). During a 16,786 patient-years follow-up, overall, fewer appropriate therapies were observed in women (HR = 0.59, CI95% 0.45-0.76; P<0.001). By contrast, no sex-specific interaction was observed for inappropriate shocks (OR for women = 1.00, 95%CI 0.74-1.35, P=0.997) and mortality (HR = 0.87; 95%CI 0.66-1.15, P=0.324), with similar patterns of cause of deaths. Conclusion: In our real life registry, women account for the minority of ICD recipients. While female ICD recipients present with features of more severe heart failure in the setting of primary prevention of sudden cardiac death, we observed they have a 40% lower incidence of appropriate therapies.

Worldwide differences in primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator utilization and outcomes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Nauffal ◽  
Peter Marstrand ◽  
Larry Han ◽  
Victoria N Parikh ◽  
Adam S Helms ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Icd Implantation ◽  
Icd Therapy ◽  
Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Implantation Rates ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Aims  Risk stratification algorithms for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and regional differences in clinical practice have evolved over time. We sought to compare primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation rates and associated clinical outcomes in US vs. non-US tertiary HCM centres within the international Sarcomeric Human Cardiomyopathy Registry. Methods and results We included patients with HCM enrolled from eight US sites (n = 2650) and five non-US (n = 2660) sites and used multivariable Cox-proportional hazards models to compare outcomes between sites. Primary prevention ICD implantation rates in US sites were two-fold higher than non-US sites (hazard ratio (HR) 2.27 [1.89–2.74]), including in individuals deemed at high 5-year SCD risk (≥6%) based on the HCM risk-SCD score (HR 3.27 [1.76–6.05]). US ICD recipients also had fewer traditional SCD risk factors. Among ICD recipients, rates of appropriate ICD therapy were significantly lower in US vs. non-US sites (HR 0.52 [0.28–0.97]). No significant difference was identified in the incidence of SCD/resuscitated cardiac arrest among non-recipients of ICDs in US vs. non-US sites (HR 1.21 [0.74–1.97]). Conclusion  Primary prevention ICDs are implanted more frequently in patients with HCM in US vs. non-US sites across the spectrum of SCD risk. There was a lower rate of appropriate ICD therapy in US sites, consistent with a lower-risk population, and no significant difference in SCD in US vs. non-US patients who did not receive an ICD. Further studies are needed to understand what drives malignant arrhythmias, optimize ICD allocation, and examine the impact of different ICD utilization strategies on long-term outcomes in HCM.

Primary Prevention of Sudden Death in Young Competitive Athletes by Preparticipation Screening

2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Domenico Corrado ◽  
Alessandro Biffi ◽  
Federico Migliore ◽  
Alessandro Zorzi ◽  
Ilaria Rigato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Sudden Death ◽  
Preparticipation Screening ◽  
Competitive Athletes

scholarly journals Primary Prevention of Sudden Death as a Novel Treatment Strategy in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Circulation ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 107 (23) ◽  
pp. 2872-2875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry J. Maron ◽  
N. A. Mark Estes ◽  
Martin S. Maron ◽  
Adrian K. Almquist ◽  
Mark S. Link ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Sudden Death ◽  
Treatment Strategy ◽  
Novel Treatment
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document