Macro Element for Pile Head Cyclic Lateral Loading

Author(s):  
Michael Pender ◽  
Liam Wotherspoon ◽  
Norazzlina M. Sa’don ◽  
Rolando Orense
2019 ◽  
Vol 106 ◽  
pp. 314-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana M. Page ◽  
Gustav Grimstad ◽  
Gudmund R. Eiksund ◽  
Hans Petter Jostad

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 1053-1064 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. M. Sa’don ◽  
M. J. Pender ◽  
A. R. Abdul Karim ◽  
R. Orense

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 685-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Chien ◽  
S. S. Lin ◽  
C. C. Yang ◽  
J. C. Liao

ABSTRACTThis paper reports the results of a series of full-scale drilled shaft load tests subjected to combined axial and lateral loading and lateral loading only. The tested shafts, 1.4m in diameter, were embedded 37m in sandy silt. All tested shafts were installed using reverse circulation method. The test results indicated, given the same lateral loading, 63% of pile head displacement resulted from combined load corresponded with the case of lateral loading only. The test results were compared to the numerical results of the software LPILE as well as the analytical solutions proposed by the senior author and his co-workers. The analytical results of the pile bending moments along shaft showed better results than that of LPILE.


Author(s):  
Bengt Fellenius

On April 4, 2018, 209 days after driving, a static loading test was performed on a 50 m long, strain-gage instrumented, square 275-mm diameter, precast, shaft-bearing (“floating”) pile in Göteborg, Sweden. The soil profile consisted of a 90 m thick, soft, postglacial, marine clay. The groundwater table was at about 1.0 m depth. The undrained shear strength was about 20 kPa at 10 m depth and increased linearly to about 80 kPa at 55m depth. The load-distribution at the peak load correlated to an average effective stress beta-coefficient of 0.19 along the pile or, alternatively, a unit shaft shear resistance of 15 kPa at 10 m depth increasing to about 65 kPa at 50 m depth, indicating an α-coefficient of about 0.80. Prior to the test, geotechnical engineers around the world were invited to predict the load-movement curve to be established in the test—22 predictions from 10 countries were received. The predictions of pile stiffness, and pile head displacement showed considerable scatter, however. Predicted peak loads ranged from 65% to 200% of the actual 1,800-kN peak-load, and 35% to 300% of the load at 22-mm movement.


Author(s):  
Oh Sung Kwon ◽  
Yongkyu Choi ◽  
Ohkyun Kwon ◽  
Myoung Mo Kim

For the past decade, the Osterberg testing method (O-cell test) has been proved advantageous over the conventional pile load testing method in many aspects. However, because the O-cell test uses a loading mechanism entirely different from that of the conventional pile loading testing method, many investigators and practicing engineers have been concerned that the O-cell test would give inaccurate results, especially about the pile head settlement behavior. Therefore, a bidirectional load test using the Osterberg method and the conventional top-down load test were executed on 1.5-m diameter cast-in-place concrete piles at the same time and site. Strain gauges were placed on the piles. The two tests gave similar load transfer curves at various depth of piles. However, the top-down equivalent curve constructed from the bidirectional load test results predicted the pile head settlement under the pile design load to be approximately one half of that predicted by the conventional top-down load test. To improve the prediction accuracy of the top-down equivalent curve, a simple method that accounts for the pile compression was proposed. It was also shown that the strain gauge measurement data from the bidirectional load test could reproduce almost the same top-down curve.


Author(s):  
Xiaowei Cheng ◽  
Haoyou Zhang

AbstractUnder strong earthquakes, reinforced concrete (RC) walls in high-rise buildings, particularly in wall piers that form part of a coupled or core wall system, may experience coupled axial tension–flexure loading. In this study, a detailed finite element model was developed in VecTor2 to provide an effective tool for the further investigation of the seismic behaviour of RC walls subjected to axial tension and cyclic lateral loading. The model was verified using experimental data from recent RC wall tests under axial tension and cyclic lateral loading, and results showed that the model can accurately capture the overall response of RC walls. Additional analyses were conducted using the developed model to investigate the effect of key design parameters on the peak strength, ultimate deformation capacity and plastic hinge length of RC walls under axial tension and cyclic lateral loading. On the basis of the analysis results, useful information were provided when designing or assessing the seismic behaviour of RC slender walls under coupled axial tension–flexure loading.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document