Teaching and Learning Patterns in School Mathematics

Author(s):  
Ferdinand Rivera
2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 564-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn M. McGarvey

A child's decision-making photo activity about pattern identification presents implications for teaching and learning patterns in the early years.


Author(s):  
Drew Polly

This chapter describes how the author leveraged asynchronous online instruction to develop elementary school teacher-leaders' knowledge of elementary school mathematics content and pedagogies in a graduate program in the United States. This chapter provides the theoretical framework of learner-centered professional development and explains how the six courses in the program embody the framework and support teachers' development of knowledge and skills related to mathematics teaching and learning. This chapter also shares the findings of a study that evaluated teacher-leaders performance on five student-learning outcomes in the program as well as feedback on course evaluations and end-of-program surveys. Data analysis indicated that every teacher-leader demonstrated proficiency on each student-learning outcome. Implications for the design of asynchronous online programs are also shared.


2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-69
Author(s):  
Andrea Christie

Share news about happenings in the field of elementary school mathematics education, views on matters pertaining to teaching and learning mathematics in the early childhood or elementary school years, and reactions to previously published opinion pieces or articles.


2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 325-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Drew Polly

Readers share news about happenings in the field of elementary school mathematics education, views on matters pertaining to teaching and learning mathematics in the early childhood or elementary school years, and reactions to previously published opinion pieces or articles.


2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
Tyrette S. Carter

Share news about happenings in the field of elementary school mathematics education, views on matters pertaining to teaching and learning mathematics in the early childhood or elementary school years, and reactions to previously published opinion pieces or articles.


1989 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 60-61
Author(s):  
Miriam A. Leiva

Changes are taking place in the teaching and learning of mathematics—students are actively involved in doing mathematics with manipulatives and models; they are discussing problems among themelves with their teacher's guidance; they are exploring alternate ways to solve problems; and they are posing questions and examining solu tions (Dossey et al. 1988). This student-oriented, problem-solving approach is advocated by NCTM's Curriculum and Evaluw ion Standards for School Mathematics (Commission on Standards for School Mathematics of the NCTM 1987) and supported by the finding of the 1986 National As essment of Educa tional Progress. Principals, the instructional leaders in the schools. can be facilitator of change, and their support of innovative programs and activitie is crucial to reforming school mathematics.


2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 564-570
Author(s):  
Janet Bowers ◽  
Jeffrey Brandt ◽  
Kevin Stovall ◽  
Mailei Vargas

Back in 1988, Tom Snyder (of Tom Snyder Productions, one of the most famous early software publishing companies) and Jane Palmer wrote a prophetic book called In Search of the Most Amazing Thing: Children, Education, and Computers. Their thesis was twofold: First, they pointed out that technology, which was just beginning to be introduced in grade schools, was so compelling that educators were “… more interested in so-called computer literacy than the real thing, literacy” (p. 2). Snyder and Palmer called for stakeholders to determine what their educational priorities were, and then to figure out what technology could do to support them. Second, they emphasized the view that teachers are indispensible components in the teaching and learning process, and that no computer will ever take their place. After 20 years, we believe that Snyder and Palmer would be gratified to read Heid and Blume's newly published two-volume set that contains a thorough anthology of how educators have defined priorities for the teaching and learning of mathematics and the pivotal roles that both the teacher and the technology play within that process. In our view, the editors have attained their goal of assembling a comprehensive digest that “… will enable the creation and implementation of curricula that capitalize on technology and will help teachers orchestrate the use of technological tools in school mathematics classrooms” (vol. 2, p. viii).


1990 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 264-268
Author(s):  
Stanley F. Taback

In calling for reform in the teaching and learning of mathematics, the Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (Standards) developed by NCTM (1989) envisions mathematics study in which students reason and communicate about mathematical ideas that emerge from problem situations. A fundamental premise of the Standards, in fact, is the belief that “mathematical problem solving … is nearly synonymous with doing mathematics” (p. 137). And the ability to solve problems, we are told, is facilitated when students have opportunities to explore “connections” among different branches of mathematics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document