Effect of fertilization on soybean yield and quality on poor soil

Author(s):  
Nedeljko Nenadic
Land ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 200
Author(s):  
Felicia Chețan ◽  
Cornel Chețan ◽  
Ileana Bogdan ◽  
Adrian Ioan Pop ◽  
Paula Ioana Moraru ◽  
...  

The regional agroecological conditions, specific to the Transylvanian Plain, are favorable to soybean crops, but microclimate changes related to global warming have imposed the need for agrotechnical adaptive measures in order to maintain the level of soybean yield. In this study, we consider the effect of two soil tillage systems, the seeding rate, as well as the fertilizer dosage and time of application on the yield and quality of soybean crops. A multifactorial experiment was carried out through the A × B × C × D − R: 3 × 2 × 3 × 3 − 2 formula, where A represents the year (a1, 2017; a2, 2018; and a3, 2019); B represents the soil tillage system (b1, conventional tillage with mouldboard plough; b2, reduced tillage with chisel cultivator); C represents the fertilizer variants (c1, unfertilized; c2, one single rate of fertilization: 40 kg ha−1 of nitrogen + 40 kg ha−1 of phosphorus; and c3, two rates of fertilization: 40 kg ha−1 of nitrogen + 40 kg ha−1 of phosphorus (at sowing) + 46 kg ha−1 of nitrogen at V3 stage); D represents the seeding rate (1 = 45 germinating grains (gg) m−2; d2 = 55 gg m−2; and d3 = 65 gg m−2); and R represents the replicates (r1 = the first and r2 = the second). Tillage had no effect, the climate specific of the years and fertilization affected the yield and the quality parameters. Regarding the soybean yield, it reacted favorably to a higher seeding rate (55–65 gg m−2) and two rates of fertilization. The qualitative characteristics of soybeans are affected by the fertilization rates applied to the crop, which influence the protein and fiber content in the soybean grains. Higher values of protein content were recorded with a reduced tillage system, i.e., 38.90 g kg−1 DM in the variant with one single rate of fertilization at a seeding rate of 45 gg per m−2 and 38.72 g kg−1 DM in the variant with two fertilizations at a seeding rate of 65 gg m−2.


1979 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. M. McPherson ◽  
L. D. Newsom ◽  
B. F. Farthing

2015 ◽  
Vol 107 (1) ◽  
pp. 181-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Spyridon Mourtzinis ◽  
John M. Gaska ◽  
Palle Pedersen ◽  
Shawn P. Conley

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 12555
Author(s):  
Gai YUHONG ◽  
Adnan RASHEED ◽  
Zhao ZHOU ◽  
John J. GARDINER ◽  
Muhammad ILYAS ◽  
...  

The soybean is one of the most significant legume crops around the globe and serves as a source of dietary components for humans and animals. It has a higher percentage of protein compared to any other crop. Soybean yield and quality have been affected by many environmental factors.  The genetic mechanism of yield and quality is still not clearly understood. Hence there is still a need to investigate the major potent factors to shed light on the mechanism behind yield and quality traits in soybean. Recently, a lot of significant work, including novel QTL, genes, and CRISPR-based genome editing in soybeans, has been done, which opened new doors of hope. The current review has presented detailed work done previously. We have also discussed the role of different breeding techniques in the conventional way of soybean improvement. The genetic factors regulating yield, quality, and disease resistance could be further cloned and transferred into elite cultivars to attain higher output in the current situation of changing environment. The integrated use of several techniques, like CRISPR/Cas9, next-generation sequencing, omics approaches, would be a fruitful way to improve soybean yield and quality. Besides this, hybridization, mass selection, pure line selection, backcross breeding, and pedigree selection should be adopted to develop novel soybean cultivars. This review concluded that soybean yield and quality improvement could be enhanced by exploring its genetic mechanism using several molecular and conventional methods.  


2003 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel W. Sweeney ◽  
James H. Long ◽  
M. B. Kirkham

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jodi L. Putman ◽  
Quirine Ketterings ◽  
Jerry Henry Cherney ◽  
Thomas R. Overton

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (16) ◽  
pp. 4740-4754
Author(s):  
Yansheng Li ◽  
Zhihuang Xie ◽  
Meng Zhou ◽  
Changkai Liu ◽  
Zhenhua Yu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document