A Tutorial on Partitioning Real Estate Investment Cash Flows Using the Internal Rate of Return

1995 ◽  
pp. 157-176
Author(s):  
Mark G. Dotzour ◽  
Donald R. Levi
Keyword(s):  
Real Estate ◽  
Cash Flows ◽  
Rate Of Return ◽  
Internal Rate Of Return ◽  
Real Estate Investment ◽  
Internal Rate

scholarly journals Reinvestment Bias When Analyzing Mutually Exclusive Assets

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 71
Author(s):  
Robert J. Sweeney
Keyword(s):  
Net Present Value ◽  
Capital Budgeting ◽  
Cash Flows ◽  
Rate Of Return ◽  
Internal Rate Of Return ◽  
Present Value ◽  
Internal Rate ◽  
Current Period ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Flows Over Time

Capital budgeting decisions generally involve the commitment of resources in the current period to secure positive cash flows over time that generate a rate of return in excess of the cost of the funds invested. The most common techniques used to perform this analysis are the Net Present Value (NPV) and the Internal Rate of Return (IRR).Conceptually, these two techniques are substitutable; i.e. the resulting decision from a NPV analysis is identical to the decision from an IRR analysis. In practice, however, the NPV and the IRR can, on occasion, produce conflicting decisions. Specifically, when analyzing mutually exclusive assets the Net Present Value can support one asset while the Internal Rate of Return supports the other. The purpose of this paper is twofold; first, to highlight structural deficiencies in the conventional application of the NPV and the IRR, and second, to demonstrate a procedure to correct for these structural errors.

scholarly journals The internal rate of return (IRR): projections, benchmarks and pitfalls

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 664-669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Patrick ◽  
Nick French
Keyword(s):  
Design Methodology ◽  
Capital Budgeting ◽  
Cash Flows ◽  
Rate Of Return ◽  
Internal Rate Of Return ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Principal Measure ◽  
Internal Rate ◽  
Measure Of Performance ◽  
Practical Implications

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss the use of the internal rate of return (IRR) as a principal measure of performance of investments and to highlight some of the weaknesses of the IRR in evaluating investments in this way. Design/methodology/approach This Education Briefing is an overview of the limitations of the IRR in making capital budgeting decisions. It is illustrated with a number of counter-intuitive examples. Findings The advantage of the IRR is that it is, on the surface, a wonderfully simple benchmark. One figure that tells a story. But, the disadvantage is that if used in isolation the IRR can give misleading results when used to assess investment proposals. Practical implications The IRR should be used in conjunction with other analyses to appraise projects, so that the user can determine its veracity in the context of other benchmarks. This context is particularly important when assessing investments with unusual cash flows. Originality/value This is a review of existing models.

scholarly journals Methodical approaches to the assessment of investment attractiveness of agricultural enterprises

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (93) ◽  
pp. 63-69
Author(s):  
R. M. Myniv
Keyword(s):  
Cash Flow ◽  
Net Present Value ◽  
Cash Flows ◽  
Rate Of Return ◽  
Internal Rate Of Return ◽  
Present Value ◽  
Investment Projects ◽  
Agricultural Enterprises ◽  
Internal Rate ◽  
Dynamic Methods

Evaluation of investment efficiency is central to the process of justifying and selecting possible options for investing in investment projects, and is therefore a key to successful implementation of investment activities of agricultural enterprises. The main directions of financing of investment projects of agricultural enterprises are: purchase or construction of unfinished construction objects, new construction, expansion of existing enterprises, reconstruction of existing enterprises and technical re-equipment of existing enterprises. Two main groups of methods of assessing the cost-effectiveness of investment projects have become most widespread: static and dynamic. Static methods involve the calculation of indicators based on undiscounted cash flows. Dynamic methods, on the contrary, take into account the change in the value of money over time and imply bringing the values of all cash flows to the same period by discounting or compounding. Dynamic methods for assessing the effectiveness of investment projects include the following basic methods that rely on most modern Ukrainian enterprises, such as net present value cash flow (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), payback period (DPP) and project profitability index (PI). On their basis the basic methods of selection of investment projects of agricultural enterprises are formed. Net Present Value (NPV) calculation. is based on comparing what will be invested in the future with what is invested now. The Profitabale Index (PI) is directly related to net present value and is defined as the ratio of the discounted cash flow to initial investment. The IRR (Internal Rate of Return) is the discount rate at which the projected cash inflows are equal to the project's discounted cash flows. As indicators of the effect in calculating the overall efficiency of investments, it is advisable to use changes in the following values of growth: revenue from the sale of enterprise products; gross income; profit before tax; net profit; cash flow; clean products. Gross and net investment should be included in the costs. The use of qualitative methods in investment analysis is due to the following reasons: the subjectivity of the phenomena or characteristics studied; lack or lack of necessary information; inability to analyze objective and acceptable methods; lack of research object (to be created during project implementation). Quantitative methods for evaluating agricultural investment projects include methods of probability theory and mathematical statistics, as well as economic and statistical methods.

scholarly journals Mutually exclusive capital projects: A critique of Fisherian analysis

1994 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-51
Author(s):  
S. Paulo
Keyword(s):  
Net Present Value ◽  
Capital Budgeting ◽  
Cash Flows ◽  
Rate Of Return ◽  
Internal Rate Of Return ◽  
Present Value ◽  
Rates Of Return ◽  
Capital Projects ◽  
Internal Rate ◽  
Project Life

In capital budgeting a Fisherian analysis is undertaken to resolve conflicts in rankings which arise when mutually exclusive projects have been evaluated according to the net present value and internal rate of return criteria. Within the literature, the projects which have been subjected to a Fisherian analysis, all have the same required rates of return because the required rate of return is held constant irrespective of the differences in the characteristics of the mutually exclusive projects. The conflict in rankings of mutually exclusive projects is typically ascribed to characteristics such as differences in initial outlay and project life span, disparities in the timing of cash flows, the reinvestment rate assumption, and the difficulties of multiple or no unique internal rate of return when the cash flows are non-conventional. Despite these differences among projects, the same required rate of return is used. The central question which is addressed in this article, is whether the same required rate of return can reasonably be used for the valuation of each of the mutually exclusive projects, as well as when a choice is made from among the mutually exclusive projects. In the discussion this 'conventional wisdom' of a constant required rate of return for both the valuations and the choice of an alternative is questioned, and it is suggested that one of the causes of a conflict in rankings may be the use of incorrectly specified required rates of return. Also presented in this article is a conceptual framework which enables a modified Fisherian analysis.

Uniqueness of non-negative internal rate of return

1982 ◽  
Vol 109 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allen M. Russell ◽  
John A. Rickard
Keyword(s):  
Investment Project ◽  
Cash Flows ◽  
Rate Of Return ◽  
Financial Security ◽  
Internal Rate Of Return ◽  
Present Value ◽  
Common Procedure ◽  
Internal Rate ◽  
Market Rate ◽  
Image Position

We will be considering a productive investment project or financial security which yields a sequence of cash flows, positive or negative, over time. Let a1 (dollars) be the cash flow from the project at time t, where t takes the values 0, 1, 2,…, n. Given the known cash flows at from the project, and a known market rate of interest, i per period, at which money may be borrowed or invested, a common procedure is to accept the project if its present value P is greater than zero, whereAn internal rate of return of the project is defined to be a solution of the equationin (− 1, ∞), if, of course, one exists.

scholarly journals Capital budgeting practices in South Africa: A review

2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 11-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Correia
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Cash Flow ◽  
Net Present Value ◽  
Financial Analysis ◽  
Capital Budgeting ◽  
Cash Flows ◽  
Rate Of Return ◽  
Internal Rate Of Return ◽  
Significant Growth ◽  
Internal Rate

This paper reviews the capital budgeting survey literature in South Africa over the period 1972 to 2008. The survey evidence indicates a significant growth in Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) methods and a fall in the use of other methods. In particular, there has been growth in the use of Net Present Value (NPV). Yet, the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) technique remains the primary method used in practice despite some serious drawbacks. Larger companies are more likely to use DCF methods. There has been a significant growth in the use of sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis. However, there is little use of sophisticated risk analysis tools such as Monte Carlo simulation, and decision trees. Although financial theory predicates the use of risk adjusted discount rates, surveys indicate that the majority of companies use a single firm discount rate. Companies have increasingly used inflation-adjusted cash flows but the process of ranking mutually exclusive projects is not aligned with finance theory. There is limited use of the Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR) method and DCF dominant companies do not outperform non-DCF dominant companies. The most important phase of project evaluation is the project definition and cash flow estimation phase and yet research studies have focused mainly on the financial analysis and project selection phase.

ANALISIS KELAYAKAN FINANSIAL INDUSTRI PENGOLAHAN KECAP ANEKA GUNA DI KOTA LANGSA

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-30
Author(s):  
Muhammad Jamil ◽  
Januari Frizki Bella
Keyword(s):  
Net Present Value ◽  
Rate Of Return ◽  
Internal Rate Of Return ◽  
Present Value ◽  
Internal Rate

Adapun tujuan dari Penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui kelayakan usaha industri pengolahan kecap Aneka Guna apabila dilihat dari segi kelayakan finansial. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode studi kasus. Lokasi penelitian yaitu di Kota Langsa dengan pertimbangan bahwa lokasi tersebut merupakan daerah yang terdapat industri pengolahan kecap asin dan mudah di jangkau oleh penulis. Waktu penelitian dilaksanakan pada Bulan Juni - Oktober 2014. Tenaga kerja yang digunakan berjumlah 27 orang, 20 tenaga kerja pria dan 7 orang tenaga kerja wanita. Jumlah penggunaan tenaga kerja selama 5 tahun sebesar 3759 HKP. Total biaya produksi yang dikeluarkan oleh pengusaha dalam usaha pembuatan kecap didaerah penelitian selama 5 tahun adalah Rp. 2.076.988.000,-. Pendapatan kotor yang diperoleh pengusaha sebesar Rp. 8.199.690.000,- dan pendapan bersih yang diperoleh sebesar Rp. 6.122.702.000,-                 Kota Langsa hanya memiliki 1 pengusaha pengolahan kecap asin dan dijadikan sebagai pengusaha sampel yaitu usaha industri pengolahan kecap asin Aneka Guna. Hasil perhitungan di peroleh Net Present Value (NPV) sebesar Rp. 263.281.290 (lebih besar dari nol), sedangkan Internal Rate of Return (IRR) sebesar 84% lebih besar dari tingkat bunga yang berlaku (D.F. = 18%), sedangkan Net B/C Ratio sebesar 3,27 (lebih dari pada 1) dan Pay Back Priod (PBP) 1 Tahun 6 Bulan (lebih kecil dari umur ekonomis).  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document