Coastal State “Rights” Within the 200-Mile Exclusive Economic Zone

1989 ◽  
pp. 97-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald McRae ◽  
Gordon Munro
2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 166-198
Author(s):  
Zoe Scanlon

Abstract Although a delicate ‘balance’ was struck between coastal State rights and flag State freedoms in the exclusive economic zone (eez) during negotiations of the losc, uncertainty persists around the specific content of these rights and freedoms. This uncertainty has been highlighted through numerous legal disputes regarding the confiscation of foreign fishing vessels for eez fisheries offences—now a common feature in coastal State maritime enforcement regimes. Amidst longstanding ambiguity around the legality of vessel confiscation regimes and their permissible design, M/V Virginia G was the first itlos decision to consider these questions directly. This article evaluates whether the decision provided greater clarity on these questions. In doing so, it reflects on the strikingly altered realities of fishing practices since the negotiation of the losc, and whether the Tribunal’s approach reflects an appropriate application of the eez ‘balance’ in light of contemporary circumstances faced by the international community today.


2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 558-584
Author(s):  
Camille Goodman

Abstract Given the ambiguous, open-ended and highly qualified nature of the legal framework governing the coastal State’s regulation of living resources in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ), there is an important role for international courts and tribunals in reviewing the innovations and interpretations offered by coastal States, and clarifying the meaning of relevant provisions. In light of the significant body of jurisprudence that is now available in this area, this article seeks to provide some practical guidance regarding the nature and extent of coastal State jurisdiction over living resources in the EEZ, by reference to the approaches taken by international courts and tribunals.


2021 ◽  
pp. 63-116
Author(s):  
Camille Goodman

This Chapter examines the material scope of the coastal State’s jurisdiction over foreign vessels in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) on the basis of its sovereign rights over living resources, in order to determine what activities and which vessels come within this regulatory power. It argues that ‘fishing’ is no longer simply a process that involves fishing vessels catching fish; in the modern industrial fishing complex, where bunkering, transhipment, and resupply services allow fishing vessels to stay at sea for months at a time, fishing is part of a chain of events involving multiple actors and activities, all of which fall within the regulatory authority of the coastal State in the EEZ. Notwithstanding the conflicting and inconsistent approaches that international courts and tribunals have taken to this issue, the Chapter’s examination of national, regional, and international practice demonstrates that coastal States can regulate a wide range of fishing and related activities on the basis of their sovereign rights over living resources in the EEZ. This includes all the ‘fishing related activities’ and ‘fishing support vessels’ that are involved in modern industrial fishing, regardless of whether the vessels in question are licensed to fish in the coastal State’s EEZ, or whether the activities in question relate to living resources harvested in the coastal State’s EEZ. This finding as to the underlying scope of coastal State jurisdiction provides a crucial foundation for the remainder of the book.


2014 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 1161-1226
Author(s):  
Vincent Cogliati-Bantz

On April 14, 2014, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (the Tribunal) rendered its Judgment in the case of the M/V Virginia G.. The judgment notably clarifies the scope of the sovereign rights of a coastal state with respect to living resources in its exclusive economic zone (EEZ).


SASI ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
Fathan Ali Mubiina

The supporting idea of this topics relates to the term of exclusive economic zone which is defined as a territorial sea outside, coastal states that have sovereignty over all natural resources in them and have the right to the application of Coastal state jurisdiction. This zone is located at 200 miles from the base of the territorial sea. Indonesia requires the Blue Constitution or maritime constitution as a constitutional basis for the use of maritime territory in Indonesia. This is what is said to be horizontally integrated territory. There is also the condition of a country's territorial territory separated from other countries' territorial territories. The essence of the state is to control a territory and be recognized internationally. There is existing country if it occupies an area which is its right to the interests of social and geographical unity. The sea area of a country such as Indonesia contained in the provisions of the 1945 Constitution is referred as the blue constitution inside.


Author(s):  
Camille Goodman

Under the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (LOSC), coastal States have sovereign rights to explore, exploit, conserve, and manage the living resources of the 200 nautical mile exclusive economic zone (EEZ). However, nearly forty years after the adoption of the LOSC , there is still a great deal of uncertainty about the nature and extent of these sovereign rights. This book examines the ways in which coastal States can exercise authority on the basis of their sovereign rights over living resources in the EEZ. It explores the key concepts of ‘fishing’ and ‘fishing related activities’ to establish what vessels and which activities can be regulated by coastal States, canvasses the criteria and conditions that coastal States can apply as part of regulating foreign access to their resources, and considers the regulation of unlicensed foreign fishing vessels in transit through the EEZ. It also examines the way in which such regulations can be enforced within the EEZ and the circumstances under which enforcement can take place beyond the EEZ following hot pursuit. Based on its review and analysis of the practice of 145 coastal States, the book identifies the contemporary ‘extent’ of coastal State jurisdiction over living resources in the EEZ and proposes a formulation of the underlying and enduring ‘nature’ of that jurisdiction which could be applied to resolve future jurisdictional challenges in the EEZ.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document