Dynamic organization in biologically oriented artificial systems

1997 ◽  
pp. 145-176
Author(s):  
M. A. Aon ◽  
S. Cortassa
Keyword(s):  
1995 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 281-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Bridge ◽  
D X Xia ◽  
M Carmo-Fonseca ◽  
B Cardinali ◽  
A I Lamond ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 1001-1005 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Daumas ◽  
N. Destainville ◽  
C. Millot ◽  
A. Lopez ◽  
D. Dean ◽  
...  

The monitoring of the movements of membrane proteins (or lipids) by single-particle tracking enables one to obtain reliable insights into the complex dynamic organization of the plasma membrane constituents. Using this technique, we investigated the diffusional behaviour of a G-protein-coupled receptor. The trajectories of the receptors revealed a diffusion mode combining a short-term rapid confined diffusion with a long-term slow diffusion. A detailed statistical analysis shows that the receptors have a diffusion confined to a domain which itself diffuses, the confinement being due to long-range attractive inter-protein interactions. The existing models of the dynamic organization of the cell membrane cannot explain our results. We propose a theoretical Brownian model of interacting proteins that is consistent with the experimental observations and accounts for the variations found as a function of the domain size of the short-term and long-term diffusion coefficients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 282-293.e7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadasu Nozaki ◽  
Ryosuke Imai ◽  
Mai Tanbo ◽  
Ryosuke Nagashima ◽  
Sachiko Tamura ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 085014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alona Birjiniuk ◽  
Nicole Billings ◽  
Elizabeth Nance ◽  
Justin Hanes ◽  
Katharina Ribbeck ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 105 (38) ◽  
pp. 14545-14550 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Brass ◽  
J. M. Berke ◽  
R. Montserret ◽  
H. E. Blum ◽  
F. Penin ◽  
...  

1987 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 833-838 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Lépinoux ◽  
L.P. Kubin
Keyword(s):  

Psychology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Latzman ◽  
Yuri Shishido

The title of “Godfather of Personality” may well be ascribed to Gordon Allport, who was the first to make public efforts to promote the “field of personality” in the 1930s (see Allport and Vernon 1930, cited under Gordon Allport). Personality psychology—located within what many argue is the broadest, most encompassing branch of psychological science—can be defined as the study of the dynamic organization, within the individual, of psychological systems that create the person’s characteristic patterns of behaviors, thoughts, and feelings (see Allport 1961, also cited under Gordon Allport). The field of personality psychology is concerned with both individual differences—that is, the way in which people differ from one another—and intrapersonal functioning, the set of processes taking place within any individual person. The area of personality psychology is often grouped with social psychology in research programs at universities; however, these are quite different approaches to understanding individuals. While social psychology attempts to understand the individual in interpersonal or group contexts (i.e., “when placed in Situation A, how do people, in general, respond?”), personality psychology investigates individual differences (i.e., “how are people similar and different in how they respond to the same situation?”). Personality psychology has a long history and, as such, is an extremely large and broad field that includes a large number of approaches. Discerning readers will quickly note that the current chapter is largely focused on what has come to be the most commonly studied perspective, the trait approach. Those readers interested in other approaches are referred to a number of resources focusing on Other Approaches within the diverse field.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document