Abstract
Introduction
Colorectal anastomotic leaks (AL) are an unfortunate occurrence and are associated with a high mortality. The aim of this multi-centre study is to explore the different management strategies used and compare outcomes in the management of AL.
Method
All patients who had an AL were included at seven hospitals across the East of England. Morbidity, mortality, and survival were compared across the different management strategies.
Results
A total of 247 consecutive patients were included of which 60.3% were male and the median age was 68 (IQR 57-77). Half of patients were initially managed conservatively, a further 10.5% had a radiological procedure. 39.7% required surgery as an initial treatment. Of those who initially did not have a surgical intervention (n = 149), 10.7% (n = 16/149) eventually required laparotomy. Ultimately, 42.7% (n = 106/248) required a laparotomy. The 30- and 90-day across the entire population mortality were 3.6% and 4.9% respectively. There were no significant differences in mortality or long-terms survival between the different initial treatment modalities.
Conclusions
Despite initial conservative, antibiotic and radiological intervention being successful in the majority of patients, two out of five patients will still require a laparotomy. A consensus approach is required to standardise management in these difficult scenarios.
778 Management of Colorectal Anastomotic leaks: The East of England Experience