Scientific and Technological Progress and the Transformation of Agricultural Development Mode: Agricultural Intensification

Author(s):  
Wen Xiao
Agriculture ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianxu Liu ◽  
Changrui Dong ◽  
Shutong Liu ◽  
Sanzidur Rahman ◽  
Songsak Sriboonchitta

The core of agricultural development depends on agricultural production efficiency improvement, and total-factor productivity growth is its significant embodiment. Hence, it is essential to address the question of “how to improve China’s agricultural productivity and efficiency in order to achieve growth and sustainability of agriculture in the future”. This paper estimates indices of China’s agricultural technical efficiency (TE) scores, total-factor productivity (TFP), and its two components, technological change/progress (TC) and technical efficiency change (EC), using provincial-level panel data of 30 provinces from 2002 to 2017 by applying a stochastic frontier approach (SFA). The paper also identifies determinants of TE, TC, and TFP using selected indicators from four hierarchical levels of the economy, i.e., farm level, production environment level, provincial level, and the state level, by applying a system-GMM method. Results reveal that agricultural labor, machinery, agricultural plastic film, and pesticides are the significant drivers of agricultural productivity, with no significant role of land area under cultivation. Constant returns to scale exist in China’s agriculture. The agricultural technical efficiency level fluctuated between 80% and 91% with a stable trend and a slight decline in later years, while TFP improved consistently over time, mainly driven by technological progress. Among the determinants, government investment in agricultural development projects significantly drives TC and TE, while the experienced labor force significantly increases TE. The disaster rate significantly reduces TE but promotes TC and TFP. The literacy rate significantly improves TC and TFP. However, government expenditures in “agriculture, forestry, and water” significantly reduce TE, TC, and TFP. Policy recommendations include (1) increased levels of mechanization and agriculture film use while avoiding an increase in pesticide use, (2) a continued increase in government expenditure in agricultural development projects, R&D to improve technological progress, and diffusion of modern agricultural technologies, and (3) investment in education targeted at the farming population in order to continue the growth in the productivity and sustainability of China’s agriculture.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lijian Zhang

China is a big agricultural country with a long history, and has created a brilliant agricultural civilization. Agriculture has always been an important foundation of China's national economy and has made great achievements. At present, promoting sustainable agricultural development has become an important part of the strategic adjustment of China's economic development mode, and it is of great significance to explore and strive to blaze a path of sustainable agricultural development with Chinese characteristics.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lijuan Wang

As a new type of agricultural development subject, family farm has developed rapidly in recent years, and some typical business models have been formed in the process of development. Objectively speaking, family farm takes family members as the main labor force and integrates commercialization, scale and intensification. It can promote agricultural development to a certain extent. It is a new path full of sunshine and hope. Under the background of new media era, family farm is close to the development direction of modern agriculture, and has gained advanced technology, which also plays a positive role in the update of the whole operation mode. This paper discusses the development model of family farm operation in the new media era, analyzes the development status of family farm operation in the new media era, and puts forward specific strategies for reference only.


1995 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-192
Author(s):  
Stig Thøgersen

Grundtvig in ChinaBy Stig ThøgersenGrundtvig and the Danish folk high-schools have been known to the Chinese since the beginning of this century. From the late 1920s, the attention of Chinese reformers turned to the rural areas, and »the Danish model« subsequently came to play a major role in the Chinese political discourse as an example of a country that had reached prosperity through education, the cooperative movement, class cooperation, and agricultural development rather than through industrialization and social polarization. A major proponent of Grundtvig’s ideas was Liang Shuming who from 1931 to 1937 headed an experiment with rural reconstruction in Shandong province. Liang was a cultural conservative who advocated economic and technological progress through the establishment of rural communities centred around village schools. The article examines the sources through which Liang and other Chinese learned about Denmark and Grundtvig, and shows how the image of a Danish Utopia was created by a number of enthusiastic supporters of the folk high-school idea, among them Peter Manniche, who visited Liang in Shandong. The relative failure of Liang’s experiment is analyzed in the context of his reception of this idealized image.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document