The Potential of Hydrokinetic Energy Harnessing in Pahang River Basin

Author(s):  
W. I. Ibrahim ◽  
M. R. Mohamed ◽  
R. M. T. R. Ismail
Author(s):  
Che-Chun Chang ◽  
Michael M. Bernitsas

Passive turbulence control (PTC) in the form of selectively applied surface roughness is used on a rigid circular cylinder supported by two end-springs in transverse steady flow. The flow-induced motions are enhanced dramatically reaching the limits of the experimental facility and motion mechanism at amplitude to diameter ratio A/D ≅ 3. In comparison to a smooth cylinder, in the fully turbulent shear layer flow regime at Reynolds number on the order of 100,000, PTC initiates VIV earlier at reduce velocity U* ≅ 4, reduces VIV amplitude depending on damping, and initiates galloping at U* ≅ 10 rather than 20. Thus, back-to-back VIV and galloping are achieved expanding the synchronization range of Flow Induced Motion (FIM) beyond U* ≅ 15 and the capabilities of the experimental set-up. The harnessed horizontal hydrokinetic power increased by a factor of four due to increased velocities in the synchronization range without any adjustment of the motion mechanism particulars.


2020 ◽  
Vol 143 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mengyu Li ◽  
Christopher C. Bernitsas ◽  
Jing Guo ◽  
Hai Sun

Abstract Flow-induced oscillations/vibrations (FIO/V) of cylinders in tandem can be enhanced by proper in-flow spacing to increase hydrokinetic energy harnessing. In a farm of multiple cylinders in tandem, the effect of interference on harnessing efficiency arises. Three years of systematic experiments in the Marine Renewable Laboratory (MRELab) of the University of Michigan, on an isolated cylinder, and two and three cylinders in tandem have revealed that synergistic FIO can enhance oscillations of cylinders in close proximity. Two cylinders in tandem can harness 2.5–13.5 times the hydrokinetic power of one isolated cylinder. Three cylinders in tandem can harness 3.4–26.4 times the hydrokinetic power of one isolated cylinder. Negative impact on the harnessed energy by multiple cylinders, such as the shielding effect for the downstream cylinder/s, is possible. Specifically for the three-cylinder configuration, at a certain flow speed, the decrease in the power of the middle cylinder can be overcome by adjusting its stiffness and/or damping.


Author(s):  
Wenyong Yuan ◽  
Hai Sun ◽  
Nicholas Beltsos ◽  
Michael M. Bernitsas

Abstract The VIVACE (Vortex-Induced Vibration for Aquatic Clean Energy) Converter harnesses hydrokinetic energy by enhancing flow-induced oscillations (FIOs) of elastically supported rigid cylinders in a river, tide, or ocean current. The harnessing power depends on the intensity of the oscillation, which is a consequence of the flow-structure interaction. The inflow condition for the downstream (2nd) cylinder is slowed down and perturbed by the upstream (1st) cylinder, due to the shielding effect. Therefore, the optimal structural parameters, i.e., stiffness and damping ratio, for the 2nd cylinder may be different from the 1st cylinder, in terms of energy harnessing. To improve the performance of the VIVACE Converter, a series of experiments are conducted in a recirculating water channel, with various stiffness combinations of two cylinders in tandem. Three center-to-center spacings, six damping ratios, and seven combinations of spring stiffness are tested. The stiffness of the 1st cylinder, K1, is 600 N/m or 1,000 N/m, while the stiffness of the 2nd cylinder, K2, varies from 400 N/m to 1,200 N/m in increments of 200N/m. Results show that K2 does not affect the energy harnessing power in vortex-induced vibration (VIV) occurring at low speeds, but has great influence on the harnessing power at higher velocities in the transition region from VIV to galloping and in galloping. Decreasing K2 onsets and enhances galloping at lower flow velocity and harnesses up to 110% more energy than the case of K1 = K2. For K1 = 1,000 N/m, the harnessed power is the same for all the combinations of K1 and K2. The overall performance is best when K1 = K2. As spacing increases, the impact of K2 is diminished as explain by the dependence of power on the amplitude and frequency of cylinder oscillations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 2021-2042
Author(s):  
W.I. Ibrahim ◽  
M.R. Mohamed ◽  
R.M.T.R. Ismail ◽  
P.K. Leung ◽  
W.W. Xing ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Wenyong Yuan ◽  
Hai Sun ◽  
Eun Soo Kim ◽  
H Li ◽  
Nicholas Beltsos ◽  
...  

Abstract The VIVACE (Vortex-Induced Vibration for Aquatic Clean Energy) Converter harnesses hydrokinetic energy by enhancing flow-induced oscillations (FIOs) of elastically supported rigid cylinders in a river, tide, or ocean current. The harnessing power depends on the intensity of the oscillation, which is a consequence of the flow-structure interaction. The inflow condition for the downstream (2nd) cylinder is slowed down and perturbed by the upstream (1st) cylinder, due to the shielding effect. Therefore, the optimal structural parameters, i.e., stiffness and damping ratio, for the 2nd cylinder may be different from the 1st cylinder, in terms of energy harnessing. To improve the performance of the VIVACE Converter, a series of experiments are conducted in a recirculating water channel, with various stiffness combinations of two cylinders in tandem. Results show that the stiffness of the 2nd cylinder, K2, does not affect the energy harnessing power in vortex-induced vibration (VIV) occurring at low speeds, because the oscillation of the downstream cylinder in this velocity range is completely dominated by the wake of the upstream cylinder. K2 has a great influence on the harnessing power at higher velocities in the transition region from VIV to galloping and in galloping. Changing K2 onsets and enhances galloping at lower flow velocity and harnesses up to 110% more energy than the case of K1 = K2.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document