Carrier Network Link Loss Rate Reasoning Algorithm Based on Network Resources and Service Characteristics

2021 ◽  
pp. 1402-1411
Author(s):  
Zhan Shi ◽  
Zanhong Wu ◽  
Yutu Liang ◽  
Xuchuan Huang
2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (14) ◽  
pp. e4070
Author(s):  
Gaolei Fei ◽  
Tianbo Li ◽  
Guangmin Hu

2013 ◽  
Vol 347-350 ◽  
pp. 2067-2070
Author(s):  
Jun Wei Ge ◽  
Jin Xin Deng ◽  
Yi Qiu Fang

How to depend on different services provide different guarantee of QoS, and to ensure the effective use of network resources will become an important task in overlay network. In this paper, we consider constraints of network bandwidth, delay, loss rate, cost ,and base on the resources of current global network, as well as user-specific QoS metric needs to choose the best QoS route based on genetic algorithm. Experiments show that the algorithm is feasible in overlay network routing,and it has the better global load balancing capabilities.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Shunli Zhang

When there are many suspected loss links, the links in the path with a higher pass rate are assumed to be nondrop packet links or assuming that the link with the largest number of shares is a loss link, but this assumption lacks valid proof. In order to overcome these shortcomings, this paper proposes a link loss inference algorithm with network topology aware. The network model is established based on the historical data of the network operation and network topology characteristics. A weighted relative entropy ranking method is proposed to quantify the suspected packet loss links in each independent subset. The packet loss rate of the packet loss link is obtained by solving the unique solution of the simplified nonsingular matrix. Through simulation experiments, it is verified that the proposed algorithm has achieved better results in terms of congestion link determination and link loss rate estimation accuracy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (06) ◽  
pp. 722-726
Author(s):  
Adam Jacobson ◽  
Oriana Cohen

AbstractAdvances in free flap reconstruction of complex head and neck defects have allowed for improved outcomes in the management of head and neck cancer. Technical refinements have decreased flap loss rate to less than 4%. However, the potential for flap failure exists at multiple levels, ranging from flap harvest and inset to pedicle lay and postoperative patient and positioning factors. While conventional methods of free flap monitoring (reliant on physical examination) remain the most frequently used, additional adjunctive methods have been developed. Herein we describe the various modalities of both invasive and noninvasive free flap monitoring available to date. Still, further prospective studies are needed to compare the various invasive and noninvasive technologies and to propel innovations to support the early recognition of vascular compromise with the goal of even greater rates of flap salvage.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document