The role of free periosteal grafts in improving the survival of autogenous onlay bone grafts to the facial bones in rabbits

1976 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 243-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noel Thompson ◽  
A. W. Lewis
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. RV1-RV5
Author(s):  
Chandni ◽  
Vinit Kumar

Introduction of dental implants and more concern in patients about esthetics after loss of natural teeth increases the demand of bone grafts. Various types of bone grafts as allografts, xenografts and autografts are used all with their own pros and cons. Bone grafts are more likely to succeed when the conditions at the recipient site are favourable and certain requirements are fulfilled. This review explores the use of various bone grafts in implant dentistry.


1982 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 52-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
BAYO J. ADEYANJU ◽  
HUGH C. BUTLER ◽  
HORST W. LEIPOLD
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Bedri Karaismailoglu ◽  
Mehmet Fatih Guven ◽  
Mert Erenler ◽  
Huseyin Botanlioglu

Scaphoid nonunion is a challenging situation for orthopaedic surgeons. Nonunion rate is especially high in proximal pole fractures of the scaphoid due to tenuous retrograde blood supply. The use of pedicled vascularized bone grafts for the treatment of scaphoid nonunion provides both good clinical and radiological outcomes. The preserved vascularity of the graft leads to better bone remodelling, less osteopenia, faster incorporation and better maintenance of bone mass compared to the conventional non-vascularized grafting. Pedicled vascularized bone grafts also allow the correction of the carpal alignment and humpback deformity of the scaphoid. Clinical and radiological results have been satisfactory and promising, making us anticipate that the role of vascularized bone grafting for the treatment of carpal diseases will increase. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:1-8. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190021


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 377-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ondine Patricia Lucaciu ◽  
Olga Soritau ◽  
Grigore Baciut ◽  
Dan Lucaciu ◽  
Mihaela Baciut ◽  
...  

1990 ◽  
Vol 6 (02) ◽  
pp. 151-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan González del Pino ◽  
Fernando Castresana ◽  
Milagros Benito ◽  
Andrew Weiland

2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 327-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minerva Becker ◽  
Salvatore Stefanelli ◽  
Anne-Laure Rougemont ◽  
Pierre Alexandre Poletti ◽  
Laura Merlini

1979 ◽  
Vol 88 (5) ◽  
pp. 642-646 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rinaldo F. Canalis ◽  
William G. Hemenway ◽  
Paul H. Ward

Recent studies on the fate of pedicle osteocutaneous grafts have shown that they remain viable and may be actively involved in the mechanics of bone repair. This communication reports on a series of experiments aimed to clarify the role of periosteum in the survival of pedicle-assisted bone grafts. Osteocutaneous grafts were developed in dogs in such a manner as to isolate the implant from normal recipient bone. Free bone grafts were used as controls and a group of pedicle periosteal grafts were studied as potential sources of bone formation. Specimens were evaluated at regular intervals over a 40-week period. The pedicle bone grafts maintained their viability and developed vigorous osteoneogenesis. The process was progressive and eventually resulted in partial substitution of the original graft by new bone of periosteal origin. The free bone grafts were resorbed and no bone formation was obtained in pedicle periosteum specimens. The study provides clear evidence that under experimental conditions no bone contact is needed to maintain the viability of pedicle osteocutaneous grafts. It also shows that the periosteum has the leading role in the restructuring process of these grafts.


2007 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Y. Shin ◽  
Mark B. Dekutoski

1988 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 635-650 ◽  
Author(s):  
William P. Cooney ◽  
Ronald L. Linscheid ◽  
James H. Dobyns ◽  
Michael B. Wood

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document