Psychomotor disturbances in psychiatric patients as a possible basis for new attempts at differential diagnosis and therapy

1986 ◽  
Vol 235 (5) ◽  
pp. 301-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. G�nther ◽  
R. G�nther ◽  
F. X. Eich ◽  
E. Eben
1995 ◽  
Vol 245 (6) ◽  
pp. 288-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Günther ◽  
P. Streck ◽  
N. Müller ◽  
G. R. Mair ◽  
E. Kalischek ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 35 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Springer ◽  
S Bechthold ◽  
A Jansson ◽  
K Kurnik ◽  
T Pfluger ◽  
...  

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan B. Douglass

AbstractDoes narcolepsy, a neurological disease, need to be considered when diagnosing major mental illness? Clinicians have reported cases of narcolepsy with prominent hypnagogic hallucinations that were mistakenly diagnosed as schizophrenia. In some bipolar disorder patients with narcolepsy, the HH resulted in their receiving a more severe diagnosis (ie, bipolar disorder with psychotic features or schizoaffective disorder). The role of narcolepsy in psychiatric patients has remained obscure and problematic, and it may be more prevalent than commonly believed. Classical narcolepsy patients display the clinical “tetrad”—cataplexy, hypnagogic hallucinations, daytime sleep attacks, and sleep paralysis. Over 85% also display the human leukocyte antigen marker DQB10602 (subset of DQ6). Since 1998, discoveries in neuroanatomy and neurophysiology have greatly advanced the understanding of narcolepsy, which involves a nearly total loss of the recently discovered orexin/hypocretin (hypocretin) neurons of the hypothalamus, likely by an autoimmune mechanism. Hypocretin neurons normally supply excitatory signals to brainstem nuclei producing norepinephrine, serotonin, histamine, and dopamine, with resultant suppression of sleep. They also project to basal forebrain areas and cortex. A literature review regarding the differential diagnosis of narcolepsy, affective disorder, and schizophrenia is presented. Furthermore, it is now possible to rule out classical narcolepsy in difficult psychiatric cases. Surprisingly, psychotic patients with narcolepsy will likely require stimulants to fully recover. Many conventional antipsychotic drugs would worsen their symptoms and make them appear to become a “chronic psychotic,” while in fact they can now be properly diagnosed and treated.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Nigro ◽  
Bettina Winzeler ◽  
Isabelle Suter-Widmer ◽  
Philipp Schuetz ◽  
Birsen Arici ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Petros Bouras-Vallianatos

This chapter examines John’s Medical Epitome. The focus here is on the first four of its six books. In contrast to the established view that this work was intended for physicians, it is argued that it was primarily written for philiatroi, intellectuals who were deeply interested in medicine, but not practising physicians themselves. The Medical Epitome, unlike John’s other two works, mainly consisted of material from earlier sources. The analysis of the text starts with a close reading of John’s proem and a discussion of the background of his dedicatee, the Byzantine statesman Alexios Apokaukos. It then shifts to an examination of the work’s structure with the aim of emphasizing John’s intentions in putting together his material. The analysis proceeds by way of a number of case studies focusing on diagnosis and therapy, and goes on to show that John intentionally condensed his material, removing specialized advice, so as to make it appeal to non-expert readers. Thus it is shown, for example, that the absence of details on invasive operations is consistent with the character of his intended readers, who were only able to use non-invasive techniques, such as phlebotomy and arteriotomy. Finally, the particular attention John paid to differential diagnosis, especially as regards eye affections, which is often supplemented with his own advice, is highlighted.


2008 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Imfeld

Rund jede vierte Person hat Mundgeruch. Dabei muss zwischen Foetor ex ore (90%) und Halitosis (10%) unterschieden werden. Ersterer ist nur im Mundatem perzeptierbar und hat seine Ursache in der Mundhöhle. Halitosis ist im Mund- und/oder Nasenatem feststellbar und die Ursache liegt entweder nasal/pharyngeal (lokale Halitosis nur im Nasenatem), pulmonal oder selten gastrointestinal (systemische Halitosis im Mund- und Nasenatem). Eine entsprechende Differenzialdiagnose ist Voraussetzung für die Kausaltherapie. Verantwortlich für den Foetor ex ore sind flüchtige Schwefelverbindungen, welche durch proteolytische Mikroorganismen in der Mundhöhle produziert werden. Prophylaxe und Therapie basieren auf der mechanischen und chemischen Reduktion dieser Erreger. Mundgeruch kann ein nachhaltiges soziales Handikap sein, weshalb das Thema nicht tabuisiert werden darf.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document