Maximum heat flux in planar metal-fiber wicks under conditions typical of heat pipes

1978 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 1272-1277
Author(s):  
A. P. Ornatskii ◽  
M. G. Semena ◽  
V. I. Timofeev
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Heat Pipes ◽  
Metal Fiber ◽  
Maximum Heat ◽  
Maximum Heat Flux

Effect of Fluid Loading on the Performance of Wicked Heat Pipes

Volume 3 ◽  
2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Kempers ◽  
A. Robinson ◽  
C. Ching ◽  
D. Ewing
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Heat Pipe ◽  
Heat Transport ◽  
Heat Pipes ◽  
Working Fluid ◽  
Fluid Loading ◽  
Maximum Heat ◽  
Horizontal Orientation ◽  
Maximum Heat Flux ◽  
Dry Out

A study was performed to experimentally characterize the effect of fluid loading on the heat transport performance of wicked heat pipes. In particular, experiments were performed to characterize the performance of heat pipes with insufficient fluid to saturate the wick and excess fluid for a variety of orientations. It was found that excess working fluid in the heat pipe increased the thermal resistance of the heat pipe, but increased maximum heat flux through the pipe in a horizontal orientation. The thermal performance of the heat pipe was reduced when the amount of working fluid was less than required to saturate the wick, but the maximum heat flux through the heat pipe was significantly reduced at all orientations. It was also found in this case the performance of this heat pipe deteriorated once dry-out occurred.

Boiling Heat Transfer Characteristics of Rotary Hollow Cylinders with In-Line and Staggered Multiple Arrays of Water Jets

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Jahedi ◽  
Bahram Moshfegh
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Stagnation Point ◽  
Surface Heat Flux ◽  
Surface Heat ◽  
Maximum Heat ◽  
Water Jets ◽  
Maximum Heat Flux ◽  
Inner Surface ◽  
Hollow Cylinders

Abstract Transient heat transfer studies of quenching rotary hollow cylinders with in-line and staggered multiple arrays of jets have been carried out experimentally. The study involves three hollow cylinders (Do/d = 12 to 24) with rotation speed 10 to 50 rpm, quenched by subcooled water jets (ΔTsub=50-80 K) with jet flow rate 2.7 to 10.9 L/min. The increase in area-averaged and maximum heat flux over quenching surface (Af) has been observed in the studied multiple arrays with constant Qtotal compared to previous studies. Investigation of radial temperature distribution at stagnation point of jet reveals that the footprint of configuration of 4-row array is highlighted in radial distances near the outer surface and vanishes further down toward the inner surface. The influence of the main quenching parameters on local average surface heat flux at stagnation point is addressed in all the boiling regimes where the result indicates jet flow rate provides strongest effect in all the boiling regimes. Effectiveness of magnitude of maximum heat flux in the boiling curve for the studied parameters is reported. The result of spatial and temporal heat flux by radial conduction in the solid presents projection depth of cyclic variation of surface heat flux in the radial axis as it disappears near inner surface of hollow cylinder. In addition, correlations are proposed for area-averaged Nusselt number as well as average and maximum local heat flux at stagnation point of jet for the in-line and staggered multiple arrays.

Thermal Aspects of Using Uranium Mononitride Fuel in a SuperCritical Water-Cooled Reactor at Maximum Heat Flux Conditions

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley Milner ◽  
Caleb Pascoe ◽  
Hemal Patel ◽  
Wargha Peiman ◽  
Graham Richards ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Supercritical Water ◽  
Thermal Efficiency ◽  
Inlet Temperature ◽  
Outlet Temperature ◽  
Maximum Heat ◽  
Light Water ◽  
Maximum Heat Flux ◽  
Centerline Temperature ◽  
Uranium Mononitride

Generation IV nuclear reactor technology is increasing in popularity worldwide. One of the six Generation-IV-reactor types are SuperCritical Water-cooled Reactors (SCWRs). The main objective of SCWRs is to increase substantially thermal efficiency of Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) and thus, to reduce electricity costs. This reactor type is developed from concepts of both Light Water Reactors (LWRs) and supercritical fossil-fired steam generators. The SCWR is similar to a LWR, but operates at a higher pressure and temperature. The coolant used in a SCWR is light water, which has supercritical pressures and temperatures during operation. Typical light water operating parameters for SCWRs are a pressure of 25 MPa, an inlet temperature of 280–350°C, and an outlet temperature up to 625°C. Currently, NPPs have thermal efficiency about of 30–35%, whereas SCW NPPs will operate with thermal efficiencies of 45–50%. Furthermore, since SCWRs have significantly higher water parameters than current water-cooled reactors, they are able to support co-generation of hydrogen. Studies conducted on fuel-channel options for SCWRs have shown that using uranium dioxide (UO2) as a fuel at supercritical-water conditions might be questionable. The industry accepted limit for the fuel centerline temperature is 1850°C and using UO2 would exceed this limit at certain conditions. Because of this problem, there have been other fuel options considered with a higher thermal conductivity. A generic 43-element bundle for an SCWR, using uranium mononitride (UN) as the fuel, is discussed in this paper. The material for the sheath is Inconel-600, because it has a high resistance to corrosion and can adhere to the maximum sheath-temperature design limit of 850°C. For the purpose of this paper, the bundle will be analyzed at its maximum heat flux. This will verify if the fuel centerline temperature does not exceed 1850°C and that the sheath temperature remains below the limit of 850°C.

EMC3-EIRENE simulations of neon impurity seeding effects on heat flux distribution on CFETR

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuyu Dai ◽  
Defeng Kong ◽  
Vincent Chan ◽  
Liang Wang ◽  
Yuhe Feng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Heat Load ◽  
Flux Distribution ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Input Power ◽  
Heat Flux Distribution ◽  
Maximum Heat ◽  
Maximum Heat Flux ◽  
Heat Loads ◽  
Injection Location

Abstract The numerical modelling of the heat flux distribution with neon impurity seeding on CFETR has been performed by the three-dimensional (3D) edge transport code EMC3-EIRENE. The maximum heat flux on divertor targets is about 18 MW m-2 without impurity seeding under the input power of 200 MW entering into the scrape-off layer. In order to mitigate the heat loads below 10 MW m-2, neon impurity seeded at different poloidal positions has been investigated to understand the properties of impurity concentration and heat load distributions for a single toroidal injection location. The majority of the studied neon injections gives rise to a toroidally asymmetric profile of heat load deposition on the in- or out-board divertor targets. The heat loads cannot be reduced below 10 MW m-2 along the whole torus for a single toroidal injection location. In order to achieve the heat load mitigation (<10 MW m-2) along the entire torus, modelling of sole and simultaneous multi-toroidal neon injections near the in- and out-board strike points has been stimulated, which indicates that the simultaneous multi-toroidal neon injections show a better heat flux mitigation on both in- and out-board divertor targets. The maximum heat flux can be reduced below 7 MWm-2 on divertor targets for the studied scenarios of the simultaneous multi-toroidal neon injections.

Maximum heat flux in relation to quenching of a high temperature surface with liquid jet impingement

2006 ◽  
Vol 49 (17-18) ◽  
pp. 2877-2888 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aloke Kumar Mozumder ◽  
Masanori Monde ◽  
Peter Lloyd Woodfield ◽  
Md. Ashraful Islam
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
High Temperature ◽  
Jet Impingement ◽  
Liquid Jet ◽  
Maximum Heat ◽  
Maximum Heat Flux ◽  
Temperature Surface

Calibration of the Sandia One-Dimensional Direct and Inverse Thermal (SODDIT) Code for Estimating Heat Flux to a Large Pipe Calorimeter in a Jet Fuel Fire

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Bullard ◽  
Miles Greiner
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Fire Test ◽  
Spent Nuclear Fuel ◽  
Jet Fuel ◽  
Maximum Heat ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Uncertainty Range ◽  
Safety Standards ◽  
Maximum Heat Flux ◽  
Fire Environment

Industry and safety standards demand the knowledge of the thermal behavior of systems subjected to fire, particularly for the transportation of radioactive materials for spent nuclear fuel disposal and reprocessing. Experimentally benchmarked fire test data from Container Analysis Fire Environment (CAFE) are used to calibrate the Sandia One Dimensional Direct and Inverse Thermal (SODDIT) code by optimizing number of future times (NFT) at 11 and identifying a linear correlation and uncertainty range between the SODDIT input and output. The calibration is then used to predict the heat flux to a large pipe calorimeter in a jet fuel fire, for which the result is an 11 second window average of the actual heat flux. The maximum heat flux occurred at the beginning of the fire and was found to be 195 ± 37.3 kW/m2 at a 95% confidence level.

Subcooled Boiling in the Ultrasonic Field (on Cause of MEB Generation)

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fumio Inagaki ◽  
Koichi Suzuki ◽  
Chungpyo Hong
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Aqueous Solutions ◽  
Ultrasonic Vibration ◽  
Pool Boiling ◽  
Atmospheric Condition ◽  
Heating Surface ◽  
Ultrasonic Field ◽  
Subcooled Boiling ◽  
Maximum Heat ◽  
Maximum Heat Flux

Subcooled quasi-pool boiling for water, ethanol aqueous solutions of 10wt% and 50wt% and ethanol in ultrasonic field is performed for the upward flat heating surface of copper block with 10mm in diameter under the atmospheric condition. Tested liquid subcooling is 15K, 20K and 25K for water and aqueous solutions of ethanol and 20K, 30K and 40K for 100wt% ethanol. At 20K of liquid subcooling for water and ethanol aqueous solutions, no microbubble emission boiling (MEB) has been observed in quasi-pool boiling. Even if MEB occurred, the heat flux does not increase and it turns easily to film boiling. In ultrasonic field, MEB occurs remarkably and the heat flux increases higher than the ordinary critical heat flux as observed in highly subcooled boiling. The experimental results show that the ultrasonic vibration introduces the instability of interface of liquid and vapor and accelerate MEB at 20K of liquid subcooling for water and aqueous solutions of ethanol. At 15K of liquid subcooling for water and aqueous solutions, no effect of ultrasonic vibration is observed. At 25K of liquid subcooling, the ultrasonic vibration extends MEB region to higher superheat of heating surface for aqueous solutions of ethanol. The maximum heat flux in MEB decreases with increasing of ethanol concentration and becomes CHF for 100wt% ethanol. No effect of ultrasonic vibration on boiling is observed for the 100wt% ethanol in the present experiments.

Spot Cooling of Local-High Heat Load by High-Velocity Thin Liquid Flow

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyasu Ohtake ◽  
Yasuo Koizumi ◽  
Ken Nemoto ◽  
Hisashi Sakurai
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Heat Load ◽  
Liquid Velocity ◽  
High Heat ◽  
Test Channel ◽  
Maximum Heat ◽  
Maximum Heat Flux ◽  
Dry Patch ◽  
High Heat Load ◽  
Spot Cooling

Spot cooling of local-high heat load by high-velocity thin liquid flow was examined experimentally. Steady state experiments were conducted using a copper thin-film and rectangular sub-millimeter-channels. The width of the test channel was 2 mm. The heights of the test channel were 0.5 and 0.2 mm. The width and length of a test heater was 2 mm and 2 mm, respectively. The test liquid was degassed pure water. The liquid velocities were 1.5, 5, 10 and 15 m/s. The liquid subcooling was 20 K. Location of the heater in the test channel also was an experimental parameter: the positions of the heater from the exit of the test channel were 30 mm (middle) and 0 mm (exit). Experimental results showed that the maximum heat flux (CHF or cooling limit) during experiment with the heater at exit of the test channel was similar to that with the heater at middle of the test channel: the maximum heat flux was independent of the position of heater in the test channel. The maximum heat flux occurred when bubbles coalesced together or a dry patch appeared on the heater. The coalescence bubble covered over the heater was observed at CHF in condition of low liquid velocity. For condition of high liquid velocity, a dry patch appeared on the heater, and then the dry region extended over the heater to come around the CHF. The maximum heat flux (critical heat flux) was about 8 MW/m2 in a range of present experiments. The CHF for the present sub-millimeter channel was similar to that for conventional channel. Furthermore, models were proposed using heat transfer around a coalesced bubble and at a dry patch on a heater.

Concerning the magnitude of the maximum heat flux and the mechanisms of superintensive bubble boiling

2003 ◽  
Vol 46 (18) ◽  
pp. 3411-3427 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.A. Zhukov ◽  
S.Yu. Afanas’ev ◽  
S.B. Echmaev
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Maximum Heat ◽  
Maximum Heat Flux
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document