The Russian Academy of sciences and the Soviet Academy of sciences: Continuity or disjunction?

Minerva ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 459-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Fortescue
2021 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 187
Author(s):  
Ewa Konefał

The article presents the sources of communicative models of translation, founded on the results of enthnopsycholinguistic contrastive research conducted by the Department of Psycholinguistics and Communication Theory of the Soviet Academy of Sciences (later: Russian Academy of Sciences). It focuses on the description of the relations within the triads of language-ethnos-culture or language-consciousness-culture. The problems raised by ethnopsycholinguists from the point of view of translation include lacunae and linguistic awareness of the participants of communication, including bilingual communication.


2011 ◽  
pp. 151-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Varshavsky

The article considers current problems of Russia´s science. Special attention is paid to external factors that negatively influence its effectiveness including considerable lag in public management sector. The issues of opposing higher education sector to the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) are also discussed. A number of indicators of the Russian science and its academic sector effectiveness are presented. The expediency of comparing scientific results with R&D expenditures is shown. The problems connected with using bibliometric methods are discussed. Special attention is paid to the necessity of preserving and further developing Russian science including RAS.


2001 ◽  
Vol 171 (8) ◽  
pp. 855
Author(s):  
Viktor M. Ustinov ◽  
N.A. Maleev ◽  
Aleksei E. Zhukov ◽  
A.R. Kovsh ◽  
A.V. Sakharov ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document