Full three-dimensional measurements of the cross-flow separation region of a 6:1 prolate spheroid

1994 ◽  
Vol 17 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 68-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Chesnakas ◽  
R. L. Simpson
Keyword(s):  
Flow Separation ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Prolate Spheroid ◽  
Separation Region ◽  
Dimensional Measurements ◽  
The Cross

Measurements of the Turbulence Structure in the Vicinity of a 3-D Separation

1996 ◽  
Vol 118 (2) ◽  
pp. 268-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Chesnakas ◽  
R. L. Simpson
Keyword(s):  
Flow Separation ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Prolate Spheroid ◽  
Laser Doppler Velocimeter ◽  
Turbulence Structure ◽  
Separation Region ◽  
The Cross ◽  
And Diffusion ◽  
Boundary Layer Edge

The flow in the cross-flow separation region of a 6:1 prolate spheroid at 10 deg angle of attack, ReL = 4.20 × 106, was investigated using a novel, miniature, 3-D, fiber-optic Laser Doppler Velocimeter (LDV). The probe was used to measure three simultaneous, orthogonal velocity components from within the model, from approximately y+ = 7 out to the boundary layer edge. Velocity, Reynolds stress, and velocity triple product measurements are presented. These measurements are used to calculate the skin friction and to examine the convection, production, and diffusion of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) about the three-dimensional separation. Comparisons of the measured production and diffusion of TKE in the cross-flow separation region—as well as in nonseparated regions of the flow—to the production and diffusion predicted by several models for these terms are shown.

A Family of Hodograph Models for the Cross Flow Velocity Component of Three-Dimensional Turbulent Boundary Layers

1972 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 321-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. Shanebrook ◽  
D. E. Hatch
Keyword(s):  
Flow Velocity ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Velocity Component ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Flow Profiles ◽  
Rectangular Channels ◽  
Cross Flow Velocity ◽  
The Cross

A family of hodograph models for the cross flow velocity component of three-dimensional, turbulent boundary layers is presented. The principal advantage of this family is its flexibility which allows a wide variety of possible shapes for the hodograph. An integral method based on this family is developed and applied to data obtained in curved, rectangular channels. For the cases treated, the method gives acceptable results for cross flow profiles with and without flow reversal. Suggestions for refining the method are given.

An Approach to Three-Dimensional Turbulent Boundary Layers

1966 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. D. Carmichael
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Shape Factor ◽  
Basic Assumption ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Factor H ◽  
Simple Method ◽  
The Cross

A relatively simple method for predicting some of the characteristics of three-dimensional turbulent boundary layers is presented. The basic assumption of the method is that the cross-flow is small. An empirical correlation of a basic shape factor of the cross-flow boundary layer against the streamwise shape factor H is provided. This correlation, together with data for the streamwise boundary layer, is used to predict the cross flow. The solution is very sensitive to the accuracy of the streamwise boundary-layer data which is predicted by conventional two-dimensional methods.

Three-Dimensional Calculation of Wall Boundary Layer Flows in Turbomachines

1987 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. L. Lindsay ◽  
H. B. Carrick ◽  
J. H. Horlock
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Flow Analysis ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Flow Profile ◽  
Boundary Layer Flows ◽  
Wall Boundary Layer ◽  
Boundary Layer Development ◽  
Flow Through ◽  
The Cross

An integral method of calculating the three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer development through the blade rows of turbomachines is described. It is based on the solution of simultaneous equations for (i) & (ii) the growth of streamwise and cross-flow momentum thicknesses; (iii) entrainment; (iv) the wall shear stress; (v) the position of maximum cross-flow. The velocity profile of the streamwise boundary layer is assumed to be that described by Coles. The cross-flow profile is assumed to be the simple form suggested by Johnston, but modified by the effect of bounding blade surfaces, which restrict the cross-flow. The momentum equations include expressions for “force-defect” terms which are also based on secondary flow analysis. Calculations of the flow through a set of guide vanes of low deflection show good agreement with experimental results; however, attempts to calculate flows of higher deflection are found to be less successful.

scholarly journals Prediction of side thermal buoyant discharge in the cross flow using multi-objective evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR-MOGA)

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 980-998
Author(s):  
Milad Khosravi ◽  
Mitra Javan
Keyword(s):  
Polynomial Regression ◽  
Velocity Ratio ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Temperature Profiles ◽  
Cfd Model ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Evolutionary Polynomial Regression ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Thermal Cross Section

Abstract The capability to predict the distribution of pollutants in water bodies is one of the most important issues in the design of jet outfalls. Three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model and multi-objective evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR-MOGA) are used and compared in modeling the temperature field in the side thermal buoyant discharge in the cross flow. The input variables used for training the EPR-MOGA models are spatial coordinates (x, y, z), jet to cross flow velocity ratio (R), depth of the channel (d), and the temperature excess (T0). A previous experimental study is used to verify and compare the performance of the EPR-MOGA and CFD models. The results show that the EPR-MOGA model predicts the thermal cross section of the flow and the spread of pollutants at the surface with a better accuracy than the CFD model. However, the CFD method performs significantly better than EPR-MOGA in predicting temperature profiles. The uncertainty analysis indicated that the EPR-MOGA model had lower mean prediction error and smaller uncertainty band than the CFD model. The relationships achieved by the EPR-MOGA model are very useful to predict temperature profiles, temperature half-thickness, and temperature spread on surface in practice.

Interference in a three-dimensional array of jets

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 795-819
Author(s):  
P. E. WESTWOOD ◽  
F. T. SMITH
Keyword(s):  
Cross Sections ◽  
Flow Direction ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Longitudinal Vortex ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Dimensional Array ◽  
Unsteady Jets ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Jet Cross Sections

The theoretical investigation here of a three-dimensional array of jets of fluid (air guns) and their interference is motivated by applications to the food sorting industry especially. Three-dimensional motion without symmetry is addressed for arbitrary jet cross-sections and incident velocity profiles. Asymptotic analysis based on the comparatively long axial length scale of the configuration leads to a reduced longitudinal vortex system providing a slender flow model for the complete array response. Analytical and numerical studies, along with comparisons and asymptotic limits or checks, are presented for various cross-sectional shapes of nozzle and velocity inputs. The influences of swirl and of unsteady jets are examined. Substantial cross-flows are found to occur due to the interference. The flow solution is non-periodic in the cross-plane even if the nozzle array itself is periodic. The analysis shows that in general the bulk of the three-dimensional motion can be described simply in a cross-plane problem but the induced flow in the cross-plane is sensitively controlled by edge effects and incident conditions, a feature which applies to any of the array configurations examined. Interference readily alters the cross-flow direction and misdirects the jets. Design considerations centre on target positioning and jet swirling.

Three-dimensional laminar boundary layers in crosswise pressure gradients

1974 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 641-655 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. H. Horlock ◽  
A. K. Lewkowicz ◽  
J. Wordsworth
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Free Stream ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Free Stream Velocity ◽  
Stream Velocity ◽  
Laminar Boundary Layers ◽  
The Cross

Two attempts were made to develop a three-dimensional laminar boundary layer in the flow over a flat plate in a curved duct, establishing a negligible streamwise pressure gradient and, at the same time, an appreciable crosswise pressure gradient.A first series of measurements was undertaken keeping the free-stream velocity at about 30 ft/s; the boundary layer was expected to be laminar, but appears to have been transitional. As was to be expected, the cross-flow in the boundary layer decreased gradually as the flow became progressively more turbulent.In a second experiment, at a lower free-stream velocity of approximately 10 ft/s, the boundary layer was laminar. Its streamwise profile resembled closely the Blasius form, but the cross-flow near the edge of the boundary layer appears to have exceeded that predicted theoretically. However, there was a substantial experimental scatter in the measurements of the yaw angle, which in laminar boundary layers is difficult to obtain accurately.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document