scholarly journals Prediction of side thermal buoyant discharge in the cross flow using multi-objective evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR-MOGA)

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 980-998
Author(s):  
Milad Khosravi ◽  
Mitra Javan
Keyword(s):  
Polynomial Regression ◽  
Velocity Ratio ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Temperature Profiles ◽  
Cfd Model ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Evolutionary Polynomial Regression ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Thermal Cross Section

Abstract The capability to predict the distribution of pollutants in water bodies is one of the most important issues in the design of jet outfalls. Three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model and multi-objective evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR-MOGA) are used and compared in modeling the temperature field in the side thermal buoyant discharge in the cross flow. The input variables used for training the EPR-MOGA models are spatial coordinates (x, y, z), jet to cross flow velocity ratio (R), depth of the channel (d), and the temperature excess (T0). A previous experimental study is used to verify and compare the performance of the EPR-MOGA and CFD models. The results show that the EPR-MOGA model predicts the thermal cross section of the flow and the spread of pollutants at the surface with a better accuracy than the CFD model. However, the CFD method performs significantly better than EPR-MOGA in predicting temperature profiles. The uncertainty analysis indicated that the EPR-MOGA model had lower mean prediction error and smaller uncertainty band than the CFD model. The relationships achieved by the EPR-MOGA model are very useful to predict temperature profiles, temperature half-thickness, and temperature spread on surface in practice.

Effects of alternating elliptical chamber on jet impingement heat transfer in vane leading edge under different cross-flow conditions

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
K. Xiao ◽  
J. He ◽  
Z. Feng
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Velocity Ratio ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Longitudinal Vortices ◽  
Impingement Jet ◽  
Flow And Heat Transfer ◽  
Impingement Heat Transfer ◽  
Cross Flow Velocity ◽  
The Cross

ABSTRACT This paper proposes an alternating elliptical impingement chamber in the leading edge of a gas turbine to restrain the cross flow and enhance the heat transfer, and investigates the detailed flow and heat transfer characteristics. The chamber consists of straight sections and transition sections. Numerical simulations are performed by solving the three-dimensional (3D) steady Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations with the Shear Stress Transport (SST) k– $\omega$ turbulence model. The influences of alternating the cross section on the impingement flow and heat transfer of the chamber are studied by comparison with a smooth semi-elliptical impingement chamber at a cross-flow Velocity Ratio (VR) of 0.2 and Temperature Ratio (TR) of 1.00 in the primary study. Then, the effects of the cross-flow VR and TR are further investigated. The results reveal that, in the semi-elliptical impingement chamber, the impingement jet is deflected by the cross flow and the heat transfer performance is degraded. However, in the alternating elliptical chamber, the cross flow is transformed to a pair of longitudinal vortices, and the flow direction at the centre of the cross section is parallel to the impingement jet, thus improving the jet penetration ability and enhancing the impingement heat transfer. In addition, the heat transfer in the semi-elliptical chamber degrades rapidly away from the stagnation region, while the longitudinal vortices enhance the heat transfer further, making the heat transfer coefficient distribution more uniform. The Nusselt number decreases with increase of VR and TR for both the semi-elliptical chamber and the alternating elliptical chamber. The alternating elliptical chamber enhances the heat transfer and moves the stagnation point up for all VR and TR, and the heat transfer enhancement is more obvious at high cross-flow velocity ratio.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Induced Settlements of Piled Rafts in the Coupled Static-Dynamic Loads Using Neural Networks and Evolutionary Polynomial Regression

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Ghorbani ◽  
Mostafa Firouzi Niavol
Keyword(s):  
Neural Networks ◽  
Finite Difference ◽  
Polynomial Regression ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Dynamic Loads ◽  
Prototype Model ◽  
Evolutionary Polynomial Regression ◽  
Dimensional Finite Element ◽  
Heavy Loads ◽  
Three Dimensional Finite Element

Coupled Piled Raft Foundations (CPRFs) are broadly applied to share heavy loads of superstructures between piles and rafts and reduce total and differential settlements. Settlements induced by static/coupled static-dynamic loads are one of the main concerns of engineers in designing CPRFs. Evaluation of induced settlements of CPRFs has been commonly carried out using three-dimensional finite element/finite difference modeling or through expensive real-scale/prototype model tests. Since the analyses, especially in the case of coupled static-dynamic loads, are not simply conducted, this paper presents two practical methods to gain the values of settlement. First, different nonlinear finite difference models under different static and coupled static-dynamic loads are developed to calculate exerted settlements. Analyses are performed with respect to different axial loads and pile’s configurations, numbers, lengths, diameters, and spacing for both loading cases. Based on the results of well-validated three-dimensional finite difference modeling, artificial neural networks and evolutionary polynomial regressions are then applied and introduced as capable methods to accurately present both static and coupled static-dynamic settlements. Also, using a sensitivity analysis based on Cosine Amplitude Method, axial load is introduced as the most influential parameter, while the ratio l/d is reported as the least effective parameter on the settlements of CPRFs.

A Family of Hodograph Models for the Cross Flow Velocity Component of Three-Dimensional Turbulent Boundary Layers

1972 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 321-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. Shanebrook ◽  
D. E. Hatch
Keyword(s):  
Flow Velocity ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Velocity Component ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Flow Profiles ◽  
Rectangular Channels ◽  
Cross Flow Velocity ◽  
The Cross

A family of hodograph models for the cross flow velocity component of three-dimensional, turbulent boundary layers is presented. The principal advantage of this family is its flexibility which allows a wide variety of possible shapes for the hodograph. An integral method based on this family is developed and applied to data obtained in curved, rectangular channels. For the cases treated, the method gives acceptable results for cross flow profiles with and without flow reversal. Suggestions for refining the method are given.

An Approach to Three-Dimensional Turbulent Boundary Layers

1966 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. D. Carmichael
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Shape Factor ◽  
Basic Assumption ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Factor H ◽  
Simple Method ◽  
The Cross

A relatively simple method for predicting some of the characteristics of three-dimensional turbulent boundary layers is presented. The basic assumption of the method is that the cross-flow is small. An empirical correlation of a basic shape factor of the cross-flow boundary layer against the streamwise shape factor H is provided. This correlation, together with data for the streamwise boundary layer, is used to predict the cross flow. The solution is very sensitive to the accuracy of the streamwise boundary-layer data which is predicted by conventional two-dimensional methods.

Three-Dimensional Calculation of Wall Boundary Layer Flows in Turbomachines

1987 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. L. Lindsay ◽  
H. B. Carrick ◽  
J. H. Horlock
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Flow Analysis ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Flow Profile ◽  
Boundary Layer Flows ◽  
Wall Boundary Layer ◽  
Boundary Layer Development ◽  
Flow Through ◽  
The Cross

An integral method of calculating the three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer development through the blade rows of turbomachines is described. It is based on the solution of simultaneous equations for (i) & (ii) the growth of streamwise and cross-flow momentum thicknesses; (iii) entrainment; (iv) the wall shear stress; (v) the position of maximum cross-flow. The velocity profile of the streamwise boundary layer is assumed to be that described by Coles. The cross-flow profile is assumed to be the simple form suggested by Johnston, but modified by the effect of bounding blade surfaces, which restrict the cross-flow. The momentum equations include expressions for “force-defect” terms which are also based on secondary flow analysis. Calculations of the flow through a set of guide vanes of low deflection show good agreement with experimental results; however, attempts to calculate flows of higher deflection are found to be less successful.

Predicting Landslide Displacements by Multi-objective Evolutionary Polynomial Regression

2014 ◽  
pp. 651-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo Doglioni ◽  
Giovanni B. Crosta ◽  
Paolo Frattini ◽  
Nicola L. Melidoro ◽  
Vincenzo Simeone
Keyword(s):  
Polynomial Regression ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Evolutionary Polynomial Regression

Interference in a three-dimensional array of jets

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 795-819
Author(s):  
P. E. WESTWOOD ◽  
F. T. SMITH
Keyword(s):  
Cross Sections ◽  
Flow Direction ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Cross Flow ◽  
Longitudinal Vortex ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Dimensional Array ◽  
Unsteady Jets ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Jet Cross Sections

The theoretical investigation here of a three-dimensional array of jets of fluid (air guns) and their interference is motivated by applications to the food sorting industry especially. Three-dimensional motion without symmetry is addressed for arbitrary jet cross-sections and incident velocity profiles. Asymptotic analysis based on the comparatively long axial length scale of the configuration leads to a reduced longitudinal vortex system providing a slender flow model for the complete array response. Analytical and numerical studies, along with comparisons and asymptotic limits or checks, are presented for various cross-sectional shapes of nozzle and velocity inputs. The influences of swirl and of unsteady jets are examined. Substantial cross-flows are found to occur due to the interference. The flow solution is non-periodic in the cross-plane even if the nozzle array itself is periodic. The analysis shows that in general the bulk of the three-dimensional motion can be described simply in a cross-plane problem but the induced flow in the cross-plane is sensitively controlled by edge effects and incident conditions, a feature which applies to any of the array configurations examined. Interference readily alters the cross-flow direction and misdirects the jets. Design considerations centre on target positioning and jet swirling.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document