Evidence that both ETA and ETB receptor subtypes are involved in the in vivo aldosterone secretagogue effect of endothelin-1 in rats

1996 ◽  
Vol 196 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Mazzocchi ◽  
P. Rebuffat ◽  
G. Gottardo ◽  
V. Meneghelli ◽  
G. G. Nussdorfer
1996 ◽  
Vol 117 (6) ◽  
pp. 995-999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiro Fukuroda ◽  
Satoshi Ozaki ◽  
Masaki Ihara ◽  
Kiyofumi Ishikawa ◽  
Mitsuo Yano ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 268 (3) ◽  
pp. F455-F460 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. L. Clavell ◽  
A. J. Stingo ◽  
K. B. Margulies ◽  
R. R. Brandt ◽  
J. C. Burnett

Endothelin (ET) is a potent vasoconstrictor peptide of endothelial origin, which at low doses results in renal vasoconstriction and diuresis with variable actions on sodium excretion. The current study conducted in four groups of anesthetized dogs was designed to define the role of the ETA and ETB receptor subtypes in the renal actions of low-dose exogenous ET. Group 1 (n = 4) animals served as time controls. In group 2 (n = 6) a systemic ET-1 (5 ng.kg-1.min-1) infusion mediated renal vasoconstriction, antinatriuresis with increases in proximal fractional reabsorption of sodium, and diuresis with a decrease in urine osmolality. In group 3 (n = 6) intrarenal BQ-123 (4 micrograms.kg-1.min-1), a selective ETA antagonist, abolished the systemic ET-1-mediated changes in renal hemodynamics and unmasked a natriuretic action at the level of the proximal tubule. In contrast, the diuretic response of ET was not altered by BQ-123. In group 4 (n = 6) intrarenal sarafotoxin 6-c, a selective ETB receptor agonist, resulted in a diuretic response without a change in sodium excretion. These studies suggest that the ETA receptor contributes to the renal vasoconstriction, whereas the ETB receptor is largely responsible for the diuretic response during exogenous ET. This study also suggests that at low doses ET is natriuretic in vivo by decreasing proximal tubular reabsorption of sodium independent of ETA or ETB receptor activation.


2005 ◽  
Vol 108 (4) ◽  
pp. 357-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix BÖHM ◽  
Magnus SETTERGREN ◽  
Adrian T. GONON ◽  
John PERNOW

Endothelial dysfunction may contribute to the extent of ischaemia/reperfusion injury. ET (endothelin)-1 receptor antagonism protects against myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury in animal models. The present study investigated whether oral administration of an ETA/ETB receptor antagonist protects against ischaemia/reperfusion-induced endothelial dysfunction in humans. FBF (forearm blood flow) was measured with venous occlusion plethysmography in 13 healthy male subjects. Forearm ischaemia was induced for 20 min followed by 60 min of reperfusion. Using a cross-over protocol, the subjects were randomized to oral administration of 500 mg of bosentan or placebo 2 h before ischaemia. Endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilatation were determined by intra-brachial infusion of acetylcholine (1–10 μg/min) and nitroprusside (0.3–3 μg/min) respectively, before and after ischaemia. Compared with pre-ischaemia, the endothelium-dependent increase in FBF was significantly impaired at 15 and 30 min of reperfusion when the subjects received placebo (P<0.01). When the subjects received bosentan, the endothelium-dependent increase in FBF was not affected by ischaemia/reperfusion. Endothelium-independent vasodilatation was not affected during reperfusion compared with pre-ischaemia. The vaso-constrictor response induced by intra-arterial infusion of ET-1 was attenuated significantly by bosentan (P<0.001). The results suggest that the dual ETA/ETB receptor antagonist bosentan attenuates ischaemia/reperfusion-induced endothelial dysfunction in humans in vivo. Bosentan may thus be a feasible therapeutic agent in the treatment of ischaemia/reperfusion injury in humans.


1994 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 298
Author(s):  
Takahiro Fukuroda ◽  
Masaki Ihara ◽  
Kiyofumi Ishikawa ◽  
Mitsuo Yano ◽  
Masaru Nishikibe

1997 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-39
Author(s):  
K A Kaasjager ◽  
S Shaw ◽  
H A Koomans ◽  
T J Rabelink

The authors recently reported that infusion of endothelin-1 in humans to obtain pathophysiological plasma levels causes profound renal vasoconstriction and sodium retention. The relative roles of the ETA- and ETB-receptor subtypes in these effects in humans is unknown. Such information is essential in view of the recent introduction of endothelin-receptor blockers in clinical medicine. The study presented here was designed to define the role of the ETA- and ETB-receptor subtypes in the renal actions of endothelin-1 in humans. Systemic infusion of endothelin-1, a nonselective receptor agonist, was compared with infusion of equimolar dosages of the ETB-selective agonist endothelin-3 in healthy volunteers. Endothelin-1 infusion was associated with an approximate 2.5-fold increase in plasma levels of endothelin-1. This was accompanied by an increase in blood pressure by approximately 6 mm Hg (P < 0.05). During endothelin-1 infusion, RPF decreased from 642 +/- 42 to 480 +/- 36 mL/min (P < 0.05) and GFR from 121 +/- 4 to 109 +/- 7 mL/min (P < 0.05). Sodium excretion rate decreased during endothelin-1 infusion, from a baseline value of 182 +/- 33 to 84 +/- 28 mumol/min at the end of the endothelin-1 infusion. Endothelin-3 infusion also resulted in a approximate 2.5-fold increase of plasma levels of endothelin-3. However, in contrast to the endothelin-1 infusion, endothelin-3 had no effect on blood pressure, renal hemodynamics, and electrolyte excretion. These results suggest that the systemic and renal vasoconstrictor effects of endothelin-1 in humans are predominantly mediated by the ETA receptors.


1999 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. LOVE ◽  
William G. HAYNES ◽  
David J. WEBB ◽  
John J. V. MCMURRAY

Cardiac preload reduction through venodilatation is beneficial in chronic heart failure. The recent development of endothelin receptor antagonists for possible therapeutic use in heart failure has hastened the need for a clearer understanding of the venoconstrictor actions of endothelin-1 in this disease. Two main subtypes of endothelin receptor, ETA and ETB, exist in human blood vessels. We studied the venoconstrictor effects of endothelin-1 (a non-selective ETA and ETB agonist) and sarafotoxin S6c (a selective ETB agonist) in vivo in patients with chronic heart failure and in age-matched healthy controls. On separate days at least 1 week apart, locally active doses of endothelin-1 or sarafotoxin S6c were infused into a suitable dorsal hand vein for 1 h, and the venous internal diameter was measured using a displacement technique. Venoconstriction in response to endothelin-1 was significantly blunted in heart failure patients compared with controls (26±7% and 51±6% peak reduction in vein calibre respectively; P = 0.013). Venoconstriction to sarafotoxin S6c was similar in heart failure patients and controls (17±5% and 17±4% peak reduction in vein calibre respectively). Both ETA and ETB receptors mediate venoconstriction in healthy subjects and in patients with chronic heart failure. Optimal inhibition of the venoconstrictor effects of endothelin-1 in chronic heart failure may therefore require administration of an antagonist with ETA- and ETB-receptor-blocking properties. Chronic heart failure may be associated with a selective decrease in venous ETA receptor sensitivity, but further studies are required to clarify the functional significance of this observation.


Circulation ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 93 (11) ◽  
pp. 2068-2079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samer Kaddoura ◽  
John D. Firth ◽  
Kenneth R. Boheler ◽  
Peter H. Sugden ◽  
Philip A. Poole-Wilson

Hypertension ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias A. Bruning ◽  
Peter C. Chang ◽  
Maarten G.C. Hendriks ◽  
Pieter Vermeij ◽  
Martin Pfaffendorf ◽  
...  

CNS Spectrums ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. 17-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franco Borsini

AbstractMyriad difficulties exist in analyzing the pharmacology of the serotonin 1A (5-HT1A) receptor. The receptor may demonstrate a different activity depending on the tissue or species used for analysis, the agent used, laboratory conditions, and differences between in vitro and in vivo effects of compounds. Affinity for 5-HT receptors also varies widely, presenting difficulties in drawing definitive conclusions on affinity values for various compounds. At least two possibilities exist to explain the diversity of pharmacology of 5-HT receptors. First, it is possible that different 5-HT1A receptor subtypes exist. Second, the 5-HT1A receptors may play a far more complex role than previously believed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document