On the Coulomb scattering by a spherical charge distribution

1960 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 570-579
Author(s):  
L. Favella ◽  
E. Predazzi

2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (7) ◽  
pp. 773-783 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Buchmann

We show that the non-spherical charge distribution of the proton manifests itself in hydrogen hyperfine splitting as an increase (in absolute value) of the proton Zemach radius and polarization contributions.



2000 ◽  
Vol 68 (7) ◽  
pp. 640-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian C. Tiburzi ◽  
Barry R. Holstein


2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (24) ◽  
pp. 245102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lixing Zhou ◽  
Xiaolei Wang ◽  
Xueli Ma ◽  
Jinjuan Xiang ◽  
Hong Yang ◽  
...  


1990 ◽  
Vol 67 (12) ◽  
pp. 995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey B. Weinrach ◽  
Kay L. Carter ◽  
Dennis W. Bennett ◽  
H. Keith McDowell


1982 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Ohba ◽  
Y. Saito ◽  
S. Wakoh


Author(s):  
J. Taft∅

It is well known that for reflections corresponding to large interplanar spacings (i.e., sin θ/λ small), the electron scattering amplitude, f, is sensitive to the ionicity and to the charge distribution around the atoms. We have used this in order to obtain information about the charge distribution in FeTi, which is a candidate for storage of hydrogen. Our goal is to study the changes in electron distribution in the presence of hydrogen, and also the ionicity of hydrogen in metals, but so far our study has been limited to pure FeTi. FeTi has the CsCl structure and thus Fe and Ti scatter with a phase difference of π into the 100-ref lections. Because Fe (Z = 26) is higher in the periodic system than Ti (Z = 22), an immediate “guess” would be that Fe has a larger scattering amplitude than Ti. However, relativistic Hartree-Fock calculations show that the opposite is the case for the 100-reflection. An explanation for this may be sought in the stronger localization of the d-electrons of the first row transition elements when moving to the right in the periodic table. The tabulated difference between fTi (100) and ffe (100) is small, however, and based on the values of the scattering amplitude for isolated atoms, the kinematical intensity of the 100-reflection is only 5.10-4 of the intensity of the 200-reflection.



2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 67-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu.O. Klymenko ◽  
◽  
О.К. Cheremnykh ◽  


2020 ◽  
Vol 140 (10) ◽  
pp. 504-505
Author(s):  
Kaisei Enoki ◽  
Ushio Chiba ◽  
Hiroaki Miyake ◽  
Yasuhiro Tanaka


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document