273 Background: QM focused on areas illustrating high-quality cancer care valued by nurses and patients are needed to complement existing measures in the ambulatory oncology setting. ONS has utilized a reproducible process for pilot testing two sets of evidence-based QM for validity and reliability in the breast cancer population, drawing on evidence from ONS Putting Evidence into Practice (PEP), Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations and other resources. Methods: The ONS Foundation supported teams of expert nurses to review evidence, draft and prioritize topic areas for potential QM. Final QM were selected after soliciting national public comment from stakeholders, and were judged on importance to clinical care, prevalence and potential for impact, scientific basis and link between process and outcome. The Joint Commission (TJC) was contracted to conduct testing, and diverse pilot sites were recruited to perform retrospective data abstraction on patient charts. The Breast Cancer Care (BCC) QM set focused on symptom management for patients receiving chemotherapy, and the Breast Cancer Survivorship (BCS) set explores needs in the first year post-treatment. TJC and ONS staff co-managed development of QM specifications, abstractor training, clinical and technical support of pilot sites, and re-abstracted 15% of 2,835 submitted cases for reliability testing. Results: QM scores were examined for gaps in care; there are clear opportunities to improve the consistency of symptom assessment and management. Symptom intensity, trajectory over time, success/failure of interventions are frequently undocumented, impacting coordination of care. Post-treatment/transition to survivorship education and resource provision as recommended by the IOM are lacking. Conclusions: Audit and feedback to practices using valid and reliable QM provide a strategy to link high-level evidence-based interventions and practice changes to improve quality cancer care. National testing across diverse practice sites illustrates a strong need to improve the consistency of symptom assessment/management and post-treatment survivorship interventions.
Computed Tomography Colonography as a Sensible Option for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Evidence Based on Metanalysis
