scholarly journals Controlled fermion mixing and FCNCs in a ∆(27) 3+1 Higgs Doublet Model

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Cárcamo Hernández ◽  
Ivo de Medeiros Varzielas ◽  
M. L. López-Ibáñez ◽  
Aurora Melis

Abstract We propose a 3+1 Higgs Doublet Model based on the ∆(27) family symmetry supplemented by several auxiliary cyclic symmetries leading to viable Yukawa textures for the Standard Model fermions, consistent with the observed pattern of fermion masses and mixings. The charged fermion mass hierarchy and the quark mixing pattern is generated by the spontaneous breaking of the discrete symmetries due to flavons that act as Froggatt-Nielsen fields. The tiny neutrino masses arise from a radiative seesaw mechanism at one loop level, thanks to a preserved $$ {Z}_2^{(1)} $$ Z 2 1 discrete symmetry, which also leads to stable scalar and fermionic dark matter candidates. The leptonic sector features the predictive cobimaximal mixing pattern, consistent with the experimental data from neutrino oscillations. For the scenario of normal neutrino mass hierarchy, the model predicts an effective Majorana neutrino mass parameter in the range 3 meV ≲ mββ ≲ 18 meV, which is within the declared range of sensitivity of modern experiments. The model predicts Flavour Changing Neutral Currents which constrain the model, for instance, μ→e nuclear conversion processes and Kaon mixing are found to be within the reach of the forthcoming experiments.

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (01) ◽  
pp. 1950005 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. V. Vien ◽  
H. N. Long ◽  
A. E. Cárcamo Hernández

We propose a renormalizable T′ flavor model based on the [Formula: see text] gauge symmetry, consistent with the observed pattern of lepton masses and mixings. The small masses of the light active neutrinos are produced from an interplay of type I and type II seesaw mechanisms, which are induced by three heavy right-handed Majorana neutrinos and three [Formula: see text] scalar antisextets, respectively. Our model is only viable for the scenario of normal neutrino mass hierarchy, where the obtained physical observables of the lepton sector are highly consistent with the current neutrino oscillation experimental data. In addition, our model also predicts an effective Majorana neutrino mass parameter of [Formula: see text] eV, a Jarlskog invariant of the order of [Formula: see text] and a leptonic Dirac CP violating phase of [Formula: see text], which is inside the [Formula: see text] experimentally allowed range.


2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (21) ◽  
pp. 1444003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi-Zhong Xing

If massive neutrinos are the Majorana particles, how to pin down the Majorana CP-violating phases will eventually become an unavoidable question relevant to the future neutrino experiments. I argue that a study of neutrino–antineutrino oscillations will greatly help in this regard, although the issue remains purely academic at present. In this talk I first derive the probabilities and CP-violating asymmetries of neutrino–antineutrino oscillations in the three-flavor framework, and then illustrate their properties in two special cases: the normal neutrino mass hierarchy with m1 = 0 and the inverted neutrino mass hierarchy with m3 = 0. I demonstrate the significant contributions of the Majorana phases to the CP-violating asymmetries, even in the absence of the Dirac phase.


2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (36) ◽  
pp. 2767-2774 ◽  
Author(s):  
ERNEST MA

If a family symmetry exists for the quarks and leptons, the Higgs sector is expected to be enlarged to be able to support the transformation properties of this symmetry. There are, however, three possible generic ways (at tree level) of hiding this symmetry in the context of the Standard Model with just one Higgs doublet. All three mechanisms have their natural realizations in the unification symmetry E6 and one in SO (10). An interesting example based on SO (10)×A4 for the neutrino mass matrix is discussed.


2014 ◽  
Vol 64 (8) ◽  
pp. 806-810
Author(s):  
Myoung Youl PAC* ◽  
June Ho CHOI

2002 ◽  
Vol 532 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 19-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Barger ◽  
D. Marfatia ◽  
B.P. Wood

2020 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 334-337
Author(s):  
Xiao-Yan Wang ◽  
Xiang-Jun Chen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document