Factors Associated with Failure of Reperfusion in Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Background and Purpose: We aimed to investigate the differences in weekly variations of stroke occurrence between hyper-acute ischemic stroke patients with and without regular employments (RE), and the impact of RE on outcome. Methods: Consecutive symptomatic ischemic stroke patients with < 4.5 h from onset to door between October 2012 and May 2018 were enrolled. All the situations of employment on admission were obtained from interviews with the participant or substitute guardians. First, we divided the patients into with and without RE to evaluate the differences in weekly variations of stroke occurrence. Second, we divided the same patients into with and without favorable outcome (mRS score of 0 to 2 at 3 months from the onset) to evaluate the impact of RE on outcome. Results: We screened 1,249 consecutive symptomatic ischemic stroke patients, including 385 patients (292 (76%) male, median age 67 years) with hyper-acute ischemic stroke. Of all, 251 patients (65%) were included in RE group. In the multivariate analysis, patients with RE were more likely to develop strokes on Monday compared to that on Sunday and public holiday (OR 2.841, 95% CI 1.145-7,049, p = 0.024, Figure A). In the multivariate analysis, the factors associated with favorable outcome were low NIHSS score on admission (OR 0.909, 95% CI 0.857-0.964, p = 0.001), not receiving endovascular therapy (OR 0.175 95% CI 0.069-0.444, p <0.001), and having RE (OR 2.506, 95% CI 1.049-5.986, p = 0.039, Figure B). Conclusions: There were dramatic differences in weekly variations of hyper-acute ischemic stroke occurrence between patients with and without RE. Monday seems to be “a black day” for ischemic stroke patients with RE. RE had a positive impact on outcome in hyper-acute ischemic stroke.

Download Full-text

Collateral Flow Predicts Response to Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Yearbook of Neurology and Neurosurgery ◽

10.1016/j.yneu.2011.04.015 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 2011 ◽

pp. 26-28

Author(s):

A.A. Rabinstein

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Endovascular Therapy ◽

Collateral Flow

Download Full-text

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with internal carotid artery occlusion: a systematic review of clinical outcomes.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature ◽

10.3410/f.717953732.793459347 ◽

2012 ◽

Author(s):

Mark Wainwright

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Carotid Artery ◽

Internal Carotid Artery ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Endovascular Therapy ◽

Internal Carotid ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Artery Occlusion ◽

Carotid Artery Occlusion

Download Full-text

Current status of endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke

Rinsho Shinkeigaku ◽

10.5692/clinicalneurol.53.1166 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 53 (11) ◽

pp. 1166-1168

Author(s):

Hiroshi Yamagami ◽

Nobuyuki Sakai

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Endovascular Therapy ◽

Current Status

Download Full-text

Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

JAMA Neurology ◽

10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.1743 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 72 (10) ◽

pp. 1101 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Mark J. Alberts ◽

Ty Shang ◽

Alejandro Magadan

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Endovascular Therapy

Download Full-text

Abstract 2825: History of Cancer Predicts Mortality After Acute Endovascular Treatment for Ischemic Stroke

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.43.suppl_1.a2825 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Karl Meisel ◽

Mahesh Jayaraman ◽

Jonathan Grossberg ◽

Anthony Kim

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Endovascular Treatment ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Endovascular Therapy ◽

Hospice Care ◽

Exploratory Analysis ◽

Endovascular Intervention ◽

Consecutive Series ◽

History Of ◽

History Of Cancer

Introduction: Endovascular treatment is an emerging therapy for acute ischemic stroke. There is no clear consensus about how best to select patients that may benefit from intervention. We conducted an exploratory analysis of clinical risk factors to predict mortality after endovascular intervention in order to better understand how to improve outcomes for patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods: We identified consecutive series of patients treated with endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke at two academic hospitals between 2005 to 2010. Key clinical data elements and clinical outcomes at the time of discharge were abstracted from medical records. We evaluated univariate and multivariable associations using logistic regression and compared mean NIH Stroke Scale between those with and without a history of cancer using the t-test. Results: We identified 88 patients who received endovascular intervention with intra-arterial tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and/or mechanical thrombectomy. The mean age of the cohort was 68.2 (SD 16.6) and 44 (55%) were female. A total of 23 (26.1%) patients died during the index hospitalization or were discharged to hospice care. A history of cancer was documented in 20 (22.7%) patients. A history of cancer was associated with a 3.2-fold (95% CI 1.1-9.1) higher odds of mortality. This association persisted after adjusting for age greater than 80 years and hypertension (OR of 4.0, 95% CI 1.3-12). The average NIH Stroke Scale was 15.6 in those with cancer compared to 14.6 without (p=0.53). A history of cancer was not associated with parenchymal hemorrhagic transformation (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.3-4.9), IV tPA (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.1-2.3), a TIMI score of 2b or 3 (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.2-1.3), or an internal carotid artery occlusion (OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.5-5.1). Conclusions: In an exploratory analysis of consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with endovascular therapy, a history of cancer was strongly associated with significantly increased odds of mortality. One possible explanation could be that patients with cancer may have earlier withdrawal of care but the reasons for this observed association are unclear. Further investigation is necessary to verify and explain the reasons for this observation in order to improve outcomes for acute ischemic stroke patients.

Download Full-text

Abstract T P10: Therapeutic Time Window for Endovascular Therapy of Acute Ischemic Stroke Depends on THRIVE Score: A Retrospective Single-center Study

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.46.suppl_1.tp10 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Kenichi Todo ◽

Nobuyuki Sakai ◽

Tomoyuki Kono ◽

Taku Hoshi ◽

Hirotoshi Imamura ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Endovascular Therapy ◽

Time Window ◽

Medical Center ◽

Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽

Symptom Duration ◽

Vascular Events ◽

Good Outcome ◽

Therapeutic Time Window

Background and purpose: The outcome after endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke is associated with onset-to-reperfusion time (ORT). The Totaled Health Risks in Vascular Events (THRIVE) score is also an important pre-thrapeutic predictor of outcome. We hypothesized that the therapeutic time window is narrower in patients with the higher THRIVE score. Methods: We retrospectively studied consecutive 109 ischemic stroke patients with successful reperfusion after endovascular therapy between October 2005 and March 2014 at a single institute (Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital). Inclusion criteria was as follows: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≥8, stroke symptom duration ≤8 h, premorbid modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤2, and thrombolysis myocardial infarction score 2-3. We analyzed the relationships of ORT, THRIVE score, and THRIVE+ORT score with good outcome (mRS ≤2 at 3 months). The THRIVE+ORT score was defined as the sum of the THRIVE score and ORT (h). Results: Median ORT was 5.5 h (IQR; 4.4-7.1 h), median THRIVE score was 5 (IQR; 4-6), and median THRIVE+ORT score was 10.8 (IQR; 9.2-12.5). Good outcome rates for patients with ORT ≤4 h, >4 and ≤6 h, >6 and ≤8 h, and >8h were 50.0%, 45.8%, 37.0%, and 21.4%, respectively (p=0.3), those with THRIVE score ≤3, >3 and ≤5, >5 and ≤7, and >7 were 57.1%, 51.4%, 28.3%, and 20.0%, respectively (p9 and ≤11, >11 and ≤13, and >13 were 64.0%, 44.1%, 34.4%, and 16.7%, respectively (p<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that THRIVE+ORT score was an independent predictor of good outcome after adjusted for THRIVE score (odds ratio [OR], 1.367; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.082-1.728) or after adjusted for ORT (OR, 1.517: 95% CI, 1.160-1.983). Conclusion: Our study showed that THRIVE+ORT score was associated with outcome that was independent from THRIVE score or ORT. This is the first report to suggest that patients with the higher THRIVE score require the shorter ORT for good outcome.

Download Full-text

Abstract 1122‐000214: Clinical Factors Associated rTPA Administration in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients with History of Atrial Fibrillation

Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology ◽

10.1161/svin.01.suppl_1.000214 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 1 (S1) ◽

Author(s):

Chase A Rathfoot ◽

Camron Edressi ◽

Carolyn B Sanders ◽

Krista Knisely ◽

Nicolas Poupore ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Medical History ◽

Clinical Decision Making ◽

Past Medical History ◽

Clinical Factors ◽

Stroke Patients ◽

Factors Associated ◽

History Of

Introduction : Previous research into the administration of rTPA therapy in acute ischemic stroke patients has largely focused on the general population, however the comorbid clinical factors held by stroke patients are important factors in clinical decision making. One such comorbid condition is Atrial Fibrillation. The purpose of this study is to determine the clinical factors associated with the administration of rtPA in Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS) patients specifically with a past medical history of Atrial Fibrillation (AFib). Methods : The data for this analysis was collected at a regional stroke center from January 2010 to June 2016 in Greenville, SC. It was then analyzed retrospectively using a multivariate logistic regression to identify factors significantly associated with the inclusion or exclusion receiving rtPA therapy in the AIS/AFib patient population. This inclusion or exclusion is presented as an Odds Ratio and all data was analyzed using IBM SPSS. Results : A total of 158 patients with Atrial Fibrillation who had Acute Ischemic Strokes were identified. For the 158 patients, the clinical factors associated with receiving rtPA therapy were a Previous TIA event (OR = 12.155, 95% CI, 1.125‐131.294, P < 0.040), the administration of Antihypertensive medication before admission (OR = 7.157, 95% CI, 1.071‐47.837, P < 0.042), the administration of Diabetic medication before admission (OR = 13.058, 95% CI, 2.004‐85.105, P < 0.007), and serum LDL level (OR = 1.023, 95% CI, 1.004‐1.042, P < 0.16). Factors associated with not receiving rtPA therapy included a past medical history of Depression (OR = 0.012, 95% CI, 0.000‐0.401, P < 0.013) or Obesity (OR = 0.131, 95% CI, 0.034‐0.507, P < 0.003), Direct Admission to the Neurology Floor (OR = 0.179, 95% CI, 0.050‐0.639, P < 0.008), serum Lipid level (OR = 0.544, 95% CI, 0.381‐0.984, P < 0.044), and Diastolic Blood Pressure (OR = 0.896, 95% CI, 0.848‐0.946, P < 0.001). Conclusions : The results of this study demonstrate that there are significant associations between several clinical risk factors, patient lab values, and hospital admission factors in the administration of rTPA therapy to AIS patients with a past medical history of Atrial Fibrillation. Further research is recommended to determine the extent and reasoning behind of these associations as well as their impact on the clinical course for AIS/AFib patients.

Download Full-text

Abstract P253: Readmission in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Endovascular Treatment

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.52.suppl_1.p253 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Saqib Chaudhry ◽

Ibrahim Laleka ◽

Zelalem Bahiru ◽

Hassan S Gill ◽

Mohammad Rauf Chaudhry ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Endovascular Treatment ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽

Stroke Patients ◽

Factors Associated ◽

Representative Study ◽

Post Procedure ◽

Icd 10 ◽

Nationally Representative

Background: Recent trials have demonstrated a reduction in death or disability with endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischemic strokes. However, readmission rates and predictors are not known. Objective: To identify rates and factors associated with 30-day readmission after endovascular treatment in ischemic stroke patients. Methods: Nationwide Readmissions Data (NRD) between 2010 and 2017 was utilized to identify endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke patients using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. We used hierarchical logistic regression model to identify factors associated with 30-day readmissions. Results: Among 17, 562 acute ischemic stroke patients who survived to discharge after endovascular treatment, 2334 (13.29%) were readmitted within 30-days. Age => 65 years (odds ratio [OR]: 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09 to 1.39, p =0.0005), chronic kidney disease (OR: 1.28, 95%CI: 1.12 to 1.47, p = 0.0004), congestive heart failure (OR: 1.25, 95%CI: 1.13 to 1.39, p <.0001), post procedure intracranial hemorrhage (OR: 1.09, 95%CI: 0.99 to 1.20, p = 0.04) and diabetes mellitus (OR: 1.09, 95%CI: 0.99 to 1.20, p = .09) during the index hospitalization were associated with readmission within 30 days. Conclusion: In this large nationally representative study, nearly one in 10 patients were readmitted within 30 days after discharge in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular treatment. Medical comorbidities and post procedure intracranial hemorrhage were associated with 30-day readmission.

Download Full-text