scholarly journals A novel technique for stabilising sacroiliac joint dislocation using spinal instrumentation: technical notes and clinical outcomes

Author(s):  
Takahito Miyake ◽  
Kentaro Futamura ◽  
Tomonori Baba ◽  
Masayuki Hasegawa ◽  
Kanako Tsuihiji ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Currently, sacroiliac joint dislocations, including crescent fracture–dislocations, are treated using several techniques that have certain issues. We present the technical details and clinical outcomes of a new technique, anterior sacroiliac stabilisation (ASIS), performed using spinal instrumentation. Methods ASIS is performed with the patient in a supine position via the ilioinguinal approach. The displacements are reduced and fixed by inserting cancellous screws from the sacral ala and iliac brim; the screw heads are bridged using a rod and locked. We performed a retrospective review of patients with iliosacral disruption who underwent ASIS between May 2012 and December 2020 at two medical facilities. The patients were assessed for age, sex, injury type, associated injuries, complications, functional outcome by evaluating the Majeed pelvic score after excluding the sexual intercourse score and fracture union. Results We enrolled 11 patients (median age: 63 years). The median operative time was 195 min, median blood loss was 570 g, and eight patients (72.3%) required blood transfusion. The sacral and iliac screws had a diameter of 6.0–8.0 mm and 6.2–8.0 mm, and a length of 50–70 mm and 40–80 mm, respectively. Bone union was achieved with no marked loss of reduction in the median follow-up period of 12 months in all cases. The median Majeed score at the final follow-up was 85/96. Conclusion ASIS is a rigid internal fixation method that provides angular stability. Despite invasiveness issues compared to iliosacral screw fixation, this method is easy to confirm and achieves precise reduction.

2019 ◽  
Vol 09 (02) ◽  
pp. 160-163
Author(s):  
Isidro Jiménez ◽  
Juan Sánchez-Hernández ◽  
Dimosthenis Kiimetoglou

Abstract Background Ulnar carpometacarpal (CMC) joint dislocations and fracture–dislocations are uncommon injuries that are often overlooked. Most authors advocate surgical stabilization in order to prevent a secondary dislocation assuming that these injuries are inherently unstable. Case Description This is a series of eight ulnar CMC joint dislocations and fracture–dislocations treated by closed reduction and splint immobilization after assessing the joint stability. Mean follow-up was 30.2 months, and minimum follow-up was 12 months. Satisfactory results were obtained in range of motion, grip strength, pain, DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) questionnaire, and time to return to working activities. In the same period, the closed reduction and cast failed two (20%) cases that were referred for surgery. Literature Review There is little published literature on the nonoperative treatment of these injuries. Most of them are isolated case reports, whereas the largest series reports four cases. All of them have reported satisfactory results. Clinical Relevance Based on our results, we believe that if the diagnosis of an ulnar CMC joint dislocation or fracture–dislocation is early accomplished and a concentric and stable reduction is initially achieved, the nonoperative treatment may be a successful option to take into account but requiring a close follow-up for the first week.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-97
Author(s):  
Seung-Jae Hyun ◽  
Jong-myung Jung ◽  
Ki-Jeong Kim ◽  
Tae-Ahn Jahng

Abstract BACKGROUND S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screws improve stability across the lumbosacral junction in spinopelvic fixation procedures by crossing the cortical surfaces of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ), thereby increasing the biomechanical strength of the instrumentation. OBJECTIVE To investigate the durability and failure types of S2AI screws after spinopelvic reconstruction surgery. METHODS A single-center, single-surgeon consecutive series of patients who underwent spinopelvic fixation using bilateral S2AI screws with a ≥1-yr follow-up and at least 1 postoperative computed tomographic scan were retrospectively reviewed. Patient characteristics, radiographic parameters, operative data, clinical outcomes, and complications were analyzed. RESULTS In total, 312 S2AI screws in 156 patients were evaluated (mean follow-up, 26.1 mo; range 12-71 mo). There were no significant differences in screw diameter, length, or insertion angle between right-side and left-side screws. Visual analogue scale scores for back pain, ambulatory status, and Oswestry Disability Index scores significantly improved. A total of 10 patients (3.2%) experienced SIJ pain after S2AI screw installation. SIJ pain improved in 8 of them following SIJ block. In total, 7 screws (2.2%) showed partial periscrew lucency. Set screw dislodgement occurred in 7 screws (2.2%). Screw fracture occurred in 6 screws (1.9%): 5 neck fractures and 1 shaft fracture. A total of 5 patients (1.6%) underwent revision surgery for S2AI screw failure. Distal device (L4-pelvis region) breakage occurred in 5 patients. CONCLUSION The radiographic and clinical outcomes of S2AI screw fixation were acceptable. However, S2AI screw fixation has several drawbacks, including screw fracture and dislodgement of the set screw. SIJ irritation symptoms after S2AI screw fixation occurred with considerable frequency.


Author(s):  
Sandro M. Krieg ◽  
Nico Sollmann ◽  
Sebastian Ille ◽  
Lucia Albers ◽  
Bernhard Meyer

Abstract Lumbosacral instrumentation continues to be challenging due to complex biomechanical force distributions and poor sacral bone quality. Various techniques have therefore been established. The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome of patients treated with S2-alar-iliac (S2AI), S2-alar (S2A), and iliac (I) instrumentation as the most caudal level. Sixty patients underwent one of the 3 techniques between January 2012 and June 2017 (S2AI 18 patients, S2A 20 patients, I 22 patients). Mean age was 70.4 ± 8.5 years. Screw loosening (SL) and sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain were evaluated during the course at 3-month and maximum follow-up (FU). All patients completed 3-month FU, the mean FU period was 2.5 ± 1.5 years (p = 0.38), and a median of 5 segments was operated on (p = 0.26), respectively. Bone mineral density (BMD), derived opportunistically from computed tomography (CT), did not significantly differ between the groups (p = 0.66), but cages were more frequently implanted in patients of the S2A group (p = 0.04). SL of sacral or iliac screws was more common in patients of the S2A and I groups compared with the S2AI group (S2AI 16.7%, S2A 55.0%, I 27.3% of patients; p = 0.03). SIJ pain was more often improved in the S2AI group not only after 3 months but also at maximum FU (S2AI 61.1%, S2A 25.0%, I 22.7% of patients showing improvement; p = 0.02). Even in shorter or mid-length lumbar or thoracolumbar constructs, S2AI might be considered superior to S2A and I instrumentation due to showing lower incidences of caudal SL and SIJ pain.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangsi Shen ◽  
Shengxuan Sun ◽  
Chengyang Tang ◽  
Ye Xie ◽  
Liubing Li ◽  
...  

AbstractThis study compared the results of the minimally invasive coracoclavicular (CC) fixation with a single TightRope (MITR) procedure and the hook plate (HP) procedure for acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation treatment. Sixteen patients with a mean age of 44.9 ± 11 years were treated with the MITR procedure. Nineteen patients with a mean age of 40.2 ± 8.7 years were treated using the HP procedure. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Constant–Murley Score (CMS), and University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder score. Vertical displacement of the clavicle with reference to the height of the acromion was measured in standard anteroposterior radiographs. The mean follow-up was 27 months in the MITR group and 30 months in the HP group. No statistically significant differences were found between the MITR group and the HR group in terms of VAS score (0.4 ± 0.6 vs 0.7 ± 0.6, P = 0.138), UCLA Shoulder score (33.9 ± 2.5 vs 33.7 ± 1.5, P = 0.843), or CMS (95.7 ± 7.3 vs 93.7 ± 6.6, P = 0.400). No redislocation was identified in the HP group, while redislocation occurred in 1 of 16 (6.3%) patients in the MITR group. One patient in the HP group (5.3%) had acromial osteolysis, while no acromial osteolysis was found in the MITR group. No other adverse events, such as infections, tunnel widening, fractures, or implant-related complications, were observed. Both procedures provided satisfactory results. The HP procedure provided better reduction, while the MITR procedure provided a slightly lower tendency of pain. Long-term follow-up is needed to investigate the clinical outcomes and radiological outcomes of both groups.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-176
Author(s):  
Adam Łazarski ◽  
Sylwia Sarzyńska ◽  
Sławomir Struzik ◽  
Tomasz Jędral ◽  
Paweł Łęgosz ◽  
...  

Background. Rockwood Type III acromioclavicular joint injuries are treated both conservatively and surgically. There is still no consensus on an optimal fixation method. The aim of this study was to evaluate which of the surgical methods used in our Department produces the best outcomes in long-term follow-up. Material and methods. The study involved 27 patients. Wire cerclage was used in 12 patients, 11 patients were operated on by the Ladermann method, and a hook plate was used in 4 patients. The patients were assessed at a late follow-up visit after a mean of 22 months post-operatively. The Constant Shoulder Scale (CSS), Oxford Shoulder Scale (OSS), and PROMIS v1.2 for the upper limb were used to assess the long-term effects of the treatment. Results. There were no statistically significant differences between the Ladermann method and wire cerclage for the scales applied (p=0.98 at α=0.05). The functional CSS showed a significant advantage of the outcomes of the Lader­mann method and wire cerclage in comparison to the hook plate (p=0.014 and p=0.004, respectively, at α=0.05). The quality of life scales OSS and PROMIS showed no significant difference between the methods. Conclusions. 1. The outcomes of treatment with the Ladermann method and wire cerclage are excellent and com­parable with regard to both clinical outcomes and the quality of life. 2. The use of a hook plate may substantially contribute to worse clinical outcomes. 3. No considerable difference was found in the quality of life between the different groups, but a study involving a larger number of patients would be necessary for a complete evaluation.


2022 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ho-Seok Oh ◽  
Sungmin Kim ◽  
Jeong-Hun Hyun ◽  
Myung-Sun Kim

Abstract Background Surgical fixation using hook plates is widely used in the treatment of acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and shape of subacromial erosions after removal of the hook plate in type 5 AC joint dislocations. Further, we evaluated the effect of the shape of the subacromial erosion on the rotator cuff. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 30 patients who underwent hook plate fixation for type 5 AC joint dislocations at our hospital between December 2010 and December 2018. Patients with a follow-up of at least 1 year were included. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the final follow-up Constant-Murley, Korean Shoulder, and visual analog scores. To ensure that the appropriate reduction was well maintained, the coracoclavicular distances of the injured and contralateral sides were evaluated at the last follow-up. Computed tomography was performed to investigate the presence and shape of the subacromial erosion after hook plate removal at 4 months after surgery. Ultrasonography was performed to investigate the presence of rotator cuff lesions at the last follow-up. Clinical and radiological outcomes were compared between groups divided according to the presence and types of subacromial erosions. Results Subacromial erosion was observed in 60% of patients (18/30): 13, 2, and 3 simple groove, cave, and marginal protrusion types, respectively. Four patients showed reduction loss at the final follow-up. There were no significant differences in clinical and radiological outcomes between the groups with and without subacromial erosion. Moreover, there were no significant differences between groups according to the types of subacromial erosion. There were no rotator cuff lesions, such as partial tears, in the injured shoulders. Conclusions Hook plate fixation may induce subacromial erosions. However, the subacromial erosions caused by the hook plate did not affect the clinical outcomes of type 5 AC joint dislocations. Moreover, regardless of its shape, the subacromial erosion did not affect the clinical outcomes nor cause rotator cuff lesions after plate removal.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Panagopoulos ◽  
Irini Tatani ◽  
Pantelis Tsoumpos ◽  
Dimitris Ntourantonis ◽  
Konstantinos Pantazis ◽  
...  

Objectives. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the clinical outcomes and complications of the cortical button distal biceps fixation method.Material and Methods. All methods followed the PRISMA guidelines. Included studies had to describe clinical outcomes and complications after acute distal biceps repair with cortical button fixation. Eligibility criteria also included English language, more than 5 cases with minimum follow-up of 6 months, and preferably usage of at least one relevant clinical score (MEPS, ASES, and/or DASH) for final outcome. A loss of at least 30° in motion—flexion, extension, pronation, or supination—and a loss of at least 30% of strength were considered an unsatisfactory result.Results. The review identified 7 articles including 105 patients (mean age 43.6 years) with 106 acute distal biceps ruptures. Mean follow-up was 26.3 months. Functional outcome of ROM regarding flexion/extension and pronation/supination was satisfactory in 94 (89.5%) and 86 (82%) patients in respect. Averaged flexion and supination strength had been reported in 6/7 studies (97 patients) and were satisfactory in 82.4% of them. The most common complication was transient nerve palsy (14.2%). The overall reoperation rate was 4.8% (5/105 cases).Conclusion. Cortical button fixation for acute distal biceps repair is a reproducible operation with good clinical results. Most of the complications can be avoided with appropriate surgical technique.


2020 ◽  
pp. 219256822097823
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Nakashima ◽  
Tokumi Kanemura ◽  
Kotaro Satake ◽  
Kenyu Ito ◽  
Satoshi Tanaka ◽  
...  

Study Design: Retrospective Study. Objectives: Sacroiliac buttress screws (SBS) and S2 alar iliac screws (SAI) are used as distal screws in cases with long fusion to the pelvis. Distal fixation ends, whether exceeding the sacroiliac joint (SIJ), may affect postoperative degenerative changes in the SIJ. The aim of this study was to investigate SIJ degeneration after lumbosacral and lumbopelvic fixation, using SBS and SAI in degenerative spine diseases, respectively. Methods: This study included 70 patients aged ≥50 years with lumbosacral fusion (>3 levels). They were divided into 2 groups (SBS 20 and SAI 50 cases) based on the type of distal screws. Radiographical and clinical data were reviewed with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Radiographical SIJ degeneration was analyzed using computed tomography; clinical outcomes were evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). Results: No significant differences were observed in patients’ preoperative characteristics between the 2 groups. The incidence of SIJ degeneration, including osteophyte formation (30.0% and 8.0%, p = 0.03), intraarticular air (75.0% and 16.0%, p < 0.001), and subchondral cyst (20.0% and 2.0%. p = 0.02) in SBS and SAI groups, respectively, at the follow-up, was significantly higher in the SBS group. Although SIJ degenerative changes were significantly different between the SBS and SAI groups, there was no significant difference in VAS and JOABPEQ scores between the groups at 2 years post-surgery. Conclusions: Lumbosacral fusion can cause SIJ degeneration, which is more frequent when SBS are used in fixation to the sacrum.


VASA ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 497-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom De Beule ◽  
Jan Vranckx ◽  
Peter Verhamme ◽  
Veerle Labarque ◽  
Marie-Anne Morren ◽  
...  

Abstract. Background: The technical and clinical outcomes of catheter-directed embolization for peripheral arteriovenous malformations (AVM) using Onyx® (ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer) are not well documented. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess the safety, technical outcomes and clinical outcomes of catheter-directed Onyx® embolisation for the treatment of symptomatic peripheral AVMs. Patients and methods: Demographics, (pre-)interventional clinical and radiological data were assessed. Follow-up was based on hospital medical records and telephone calls to the patients’ general practitioners. Radiological success was defined as complete angiographic eradication of the peripheral AVM nidus. Clinical success was defined as major clinical improvement or complete disappearance of the initial symptoms. Results: 25 procedures were performed in 22 patients. The principal indications for treatment were pain (n = 10), limb swelling (n = 6), recurrent bleeding (n = 2), tinnitus (n = 3), and exertional dyspnoea (n = 1). Complete radiological success was obtained in eight patients (36 %); near-complete eradication of the nidus was achieved in the remaining 14 patients. Adjunctive embolic agents were used in nine patients (41 %). Clinical success was observed in 18 patients (82%). Major complications were reported in two patients (9 %). During follow-up, seven patients (32 %) presented with symptom recurrence, which required additional therapy in three patients. Conclusions: Catheter-directed embolisation of peripheral AVMs with Onyx® resulted in major clinical improvement or complete disappearance of symptoms in the vast majority of patients, although complete angiographic exclusion of the AVMs occurred in only a minority of patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document