Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine, 2007. II. Haemodynamics, pneumonia, infections and sepsis, invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation, acute respiratory distress syndrome

2008 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 405-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Antonelli ◽  
Elie Azoulay ◽  
Marc Bonten ◽  
Jean Chastre ◽  
Giuseppe Citerio ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lúcia Taborda ◽  
Filipa Barros ◽  
Vitor Fonseca ◽  
Manuel Irimia ◽  
Ramiro Carvalho ◽  
...  

<strong>Introduction:</strong> Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome has a significant incidence and mortality at Intensive Care Units. Therefore, more studies are necessary in order to develop new effective therapeutic strategies. The authors have proposed themselves to characterize Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome patients admitted to an Intensive Care Unit for 2 years.<br /><strong>Material and Methods:</strong> This was an observational retrospective study of the patients filling the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome criteria from the American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS, being excluded those non invasively ventilated. Demographic data, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome etiology, comorbidities, Gravity Indices, PaO2/FiO2, ventilator modalities and programmation, pulmonary compliance, days of invasive mechanical ventilation, corticosteroids use, rescue therapies, complications, days at<br />Intensive Care Unit and obits were searched for and were submitted to statistic description and analysis.<br /><strong>Results:</strong> A 40 patients sample was obtained, with a median age of 72.5 years (interquartile range = 22) and a female:male ratio of ≈1:1.86. Fifty five percent of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome cases had pulmonary etiology. The mean minimal PaO2/FiO2 was 88mmHg (CI 95%: 78.5–97.6). The mean maximal applied PEEP was 12.4 cmH2O (Standard Deviation 4.12) and the mean maximal used tidal volume was 8.2 mL/ Kg ideal body weight (CI 95%: 7.7–8.6). The median invasive mechanical ventilation days was 10. Forty seven and one half percent of the patients had been administered corticosteroids and 52.5% had been submitted to recruitment maneuvers. The most frequent complication was Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (20%). The median Intensive Care Unit stay was 10.7 days (interquartile range 10.85). The fatality rate was 60%. The probability of the favorable outcome ‘non-death in Intensive Care Unit’ was 4.4x superior for patients who were administered corticosteroids and 11x superior for patients &lt; 65 years old.<br /><strong>Discussion and Conclusions:</strong> Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome is associated with long hospitalization and significant mortality. New prospective studies will be necessary to endorse the potential benefit of steroid therapy and to identify the subgroups of patients that warrant its use.


2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 382-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yordanka Yamakova ◽  
Viktoria Asenova Ilieva ◽  
Rosen Petkov ◽  
Georgi Yankov

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by a widespread inflammation of the lungs, causing severe hypoxemia. Several mediators have been associated with it and almost all of them are small enough to be filtrated through a nanomembrane. We present a case report of a 41-year-old man with myasthenia gravis in remission; he developed ARDS caused by pneumonia. Although he performed well on both non-invasive and invasive mechanical ventilation, his oxygenation continued to deteriorate. As a last resort of treatment, we decided to apply nanomembrane-based apheresis to cleanse his plasma from the harmful inflammatory mediators. After 3 sessions of plasmapheresis, his condition improved and he was successfully weaned from mechanical ventilation. The obtained results gave us ground to assume that the removal of bioactive molecules can be a useful adjunct to protective mechanical ventilation in ARDS.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Coloretti ◽  
Stefano Busani ◽  
Emanuela Biagioni ◽  
Sophie Venturelli ◽  
Elena Munari ◽  
...  

Background: The use of cytokine-blocking agents has been proposed to modulate the inflammatory response in patients with COVID-19. Tocilizumab and anakinra were included in the local protocol as an optional treatment in critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) by SARS-CoV-2 infection. This cohort study evaluated the effects of therapy with cytokine blocking agents on in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients requiring mechanical ventilation and admitted to intensive care unit.Methods: The association between therapy with tocilizumab or anakinra and in-hospital mortality was assessed in consecutive adult COVID-19 patients admitted to our ICU with moderate to severe ARDS. The association was evaluated by comparing patients who received to those who did not receive tocilizumab or anakinra and by using different multivariable Cox models adjusted for variables related to poor outcome, for the propensity to be treated with tocilizumab or anakinra and after patient matching.Results: Sixty-six patients who received immunotherapy (49 tocilizumab, 17 anakinra) and 28 patients who did not receive immunotherapy were included. The in-hospital crude mortality was 30,3% in treated patients and 50% in nontreated (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.56-1.05, p=0.069). The adjusted Cox model showed an association between therapy with immunotherapy and in-hospital mortality (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19-0.83, p=0.015). This protective effect was further confirmed in the analysis adjusted for propensity score, in the propensity-matched cohort and in the cohort of patients with invasive mechanical ventilation within 2 hours after ICU admission.Conclusions: Although important limitations, our study showed that cytokine-blocking agents seem to be safe and to improve survival in COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU with ARDS and the need for mechanical ventilation.   *Modena Covid-19 Working Group (MoCo19): Intensive Care Unit: Massimo Girardis, Alberto Andreotti, Emanuela Biagioni, Filippo Bondi, Stefano Busani, Giovanni Chierego, Marzia Scotti, Lucia Serio, Annamaria Ghirardini, Marco Sita, Stefano De Julis, Lara Donno, Lorenzo Dall’Ara, Fabrizio Di Salvo, Carlotta Farinelli, Laura Rinaldi, Ilaria Cavazzuti, Andrea Ghidoni, Antonio Buono, Elena Ferrari, Daniela Iseppi, Anna Maria Ardito, Irene Coloretti, Sophie Venturelli, Elena Munari, Martina Tosi, Erika Roat, Ilenia Gatto, Marco Sarti.Immuno-Lab: Andrea Cossarizza, Caterina Bellinazzi, Rebecca Borella, Sara De Biasi, Anna De Gaetano, Lucia Fidanza, Lara Gibellini, Anna Iannone, Domenico Lo Tartaro, Marco Mattioli, Milena Nasi, Annamaria Paolini, Marcello Pinti. Infectious Disease Unit: Cristina Mussini, Giovanni Guaraldi, Marianna Meschiari, Alessandro Cozzi-Lepri, Jovana Milic, Marianna Menozzi, Erica Franceschini, Gianluca Cuomo, Gabriella Orlando, Vanni Borghi, Antonella Santoro, Margherita Di Gaetano, Cinzia Puzzolante, Federica Carli, Andrea Bedini, Luca Corradi. Respiratory Diseases Unit: Enrico Clini, Roberto Tonelli, Riccardo Fantini, Ivana Castaniere, Luca Tabbì, Giulia Bruzzi, Chiara Nani, Fabiana Trentacosti, Pierluigi Donatelli, Maria Rosaria Pellegrino, Linda Manicardi, Antonio Moretti, Morgana Vermi, Caterina Cerbone.Virology and Molecular Microbiology Unit: Monica Pecorari, William Gennari, Antonella Grottola, Giulia Fregni Serpini.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-95
Author(s):  
Faisal Salahuddin Sommeng ◽  
Syafri Kamsul Arif ◽  
Hisbullah Hisbullah ◽  
Muhammad Rum

Pasien COVID-19 related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (CARDS) dengan gejala ARDS sedang hingga berat memerlukan Invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) dan memiliki prognosis yang buruk dengan angka ARDS sekitar 75% serta 63% menerima Invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) dengan tingkat kematian 59% . Tingginya angka kematian pasien CARDS mendapat terapi invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) menyebabkan para praktisi kesehatan berusaha untuk menunda intubasi dan ventilasi mekanik secara dini sehingga Non Invasive Ventilation Mechanic (NIV), CPAP dan HFNC menjadi alternatif terapi dalam penanganan CARDS. Kasus: Perempuan usia 49 tahun, masuk ICU dengan diagnosa POH-4 Craniectomy evakuasi tumor sphenoid, Sepsis Syok dan Covid-19 terkonfirmasi. Pada pemeriksaan didapatkan hipoksemia dengan ARDS berat P/F ratio 112.1 mmHg dan gambaran pneumonia dextra dan efusi pleura dextra.  Sebelum pindah ke ICU Covid, pasien mendapatkan terapi HFNC FiO2 40% dengan flow 35 L/menit, RR 25, Saturasi 95%, ROX index 9,5. Pemeriksaan laboratorium didapatkan Wbc : 7.800/L, Hb: 8,1mg/dl, Plt : 131.000/mm3, Bilirubin total 1,3 mg/dl, bilirubin direct 0,83 mg/dl, Na/K/cl : 143/2,9/111, Procalcitonin : 11.2. Kesimpulan: Terapi oksigen dengan HFNC pada CARDS sedang sampai berat menjadi pilihan bijaksana dimana terapi HFNC dapat menunda intubasi dan IMV dengan outcome yang baik. Sebagaimana Surviving Sepsis/Society of Critical Care Medicine merekomendasikan HFNC sebagai pendekatan lini pertama.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Hansson ◽  
Ola Sunnergren ◽  
Anneli Hammarskjöld ◽  
Catarina Alkemark ◽  
Knut Taxbro

Abstract Background As the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic spread worldwide in 2020, the number of patients requiring intensive care and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) has increased rapidly. Tracheostomy has several advantages over oral intubation in critically ill patients, including the facilitation of prolonged mechanical ventilation. However, the optimal timing of the procedure remains unclear. During the pandemic, early recommendations suggested that tracheostomy should be postponed, as the potential benefits were not certain to exceed the risk of viral transmission to healthcare workers. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome, in terms of patient and clinical characteristics, outcomes, and complications, by comparing between early and late tracheostomy. Methods A multicentre, retrospective observational study was conducted in Jönköping County, Sweden. Between 14 March 2020 and 13 March 2021, 117 patients were included in the study. All patients > 18 years of age with confirmed COVID-19 who underwent tracheostomy were divided into two groups based on the timing of the procedure (< / > 7 days). Outcomes including the time on IMV, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and mortality 30 days after ICU admission, as well as complications due to tracheostomy were compared between the groups. Results Early tracheostomy (< 7 days, n = 56) was associated with a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (7 [Inter Quartile Range, IQR 12], p = 0.001) as well as a shorter ICU stay (8 [IQR 14], p = 0.001). The mortality rates were equal between the groups. The most frequent complication of tracheostomy was minor bleeding. With the exception of a higher rate of obesity in the group receiving late tracheostomy, the patient characteristics were similar between the groups. Conclusions This study showed that early tracheostomy was safe and associated with a shorter time on IMV as well as a shorter ICU length of stay, implicating possible clinical benefits in critically ill COVID-19 patients. However, it is necessary to verify these findings in a randomised controlled trial.Trial Registration: Not required


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document