On the similarities between micro/nano lithography and topology optimization projection methods

2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 717-730 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miche Jansen ◽  
Boyan S. Lazarov ◽  
Mattias Schevenels ◽  
Ole Sigmund
2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Rıza Yıldız ◽  
Ulaş Aytaç Kılıçarpa ◽  
Emre Demirci ◽  
Mesut Doğan

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (9) ◽  
pp. 801-808
Author(s):  
K. Wada ◽  
H. Sakurai ◽  
K. Takimoto ◽  
S. Yamamoto

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 3538
Author(s):  
Mauricio Arredondo-Soto ◽  
Enrique Cuan-Urquizo ◽  
Alfonso Gómez-Espinosa

Cellular Materials and Topology Optimization use a structured distribution of material to achieve specific mechanical properties. The controlled distribution of material often leads to several advantages including the customization of the resulting mechanical properties; this can be achieved following these two approaches. In this work, a review of these two as approaches used with compliance purposes applied at flexure level is presented. The related literature is assessed with the aim of clarifying how they can be used in tailoring stiffness of flexure elements. Basic concepts needed to understand the fundamental process of each approach are presented. Further, tailoring stiffness is described as an evolutionary process used in compliance applications. Additionally, works that used these approaches to tailor stiffness of flexure elements are described and categorized. Finally, concluding remarks and recommendations to further extend the study of these two approaches in tailoring the stiffness of flexure elements are discussed.


Author(s):  
Piotr Putek ◽  
Roland Pulch ◽  
Andreas Bartel ◽  
E Jan W ter Maten ◽  
Michael Günther ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document