The patient acceptable symptom state for the knee society score, oxford knee score and short form-36 following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham S. Goh ◽  
Ming Han Lincoln Liow ◽  
Jerry Yongqiang Chen ◽  
Darren Keng-Jin Tay ◽  
Ngai-Nung Lo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Society Score ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Oxford Knee Score ◽  
Knee Score ◽  
Short Form 36 ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee ◽  
Patient Acceptable Symptom State

Bone-on-Bone Contact on Radiograph is not a Prerequisite for Successful Outcome in Fixed-Bearing Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty—A 10-Year Follow-Up Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khai Cheong Wong ◽  
Merrill Lee ◽  
Lincoln Liow ◽  
Ngai-Nung Lo ◽  
Seng-Jin Yeo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Oxford Knee Score ◽  
Joint Space ◽  
Functional Score ◽  
Knee Score ◽  
Fixed Bearing ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee ◽  
Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract Introduction Patients without bone-on-bone osteoarthritis are excluded from mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty due to higher revision rates and poorer outcomes. However, we do not know if the same indication applies to fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty implants. Our study aims to compare functional outcomes and revision rates in patients with and without bone-on-bone arthritis undergoing fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Materials and Methods We reviewed 153 fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasties in a single institution. Patients were divided into four groups based on joint space remaining measured on preoperative radiographs. Group 1 included knees with bone-on-bone contact; group 2 included knees with less than 2 mm joint space; group 3 included knees with 2 to 4 mm joint space; group 4 included knees with more than 4 mm joint space. Patients were followed up for 10 years postoperatively and assessed using the Oxford Knee Score, the Functional Score and Knee Score from the Knee Society Clinical Rating Score, and the Short Form 36 Health Survey. Results There was no difference in terms of demographic data and preoperative scores. Postoperative Knee Society Functional Score was found to be lower in group 1 as compared with the other groups. There was no difference between the four groups of patients in terms of Knee Society Knee Score, Oxford Knee Score, and Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary Scores from the Short Form 36 Health Survey. There was no difference in terms of survivorship free from all-cause revision at a minimum of 10 years' follow-up. Conclusion Symptomatic patients with varying degrees of arthritis on preoperative radiographs had comparable clinical outcomes. We conclude that symptomatic patients with clinical and radiographic evidence of medial compartment osteoarthritis of any grade can benefit from a fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

scholarly journals The effects of patello-femoral arthrosis to the outcome of unicompartmental arthroplasty

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2_suppl2) ◽  
pp. 2325967117S0010
Author(s):  
Tolga Tüzüner ◽  
Ayşe Esin Uygur ◽  
Esra Çirçi ◽  
Murat Eren ◽  
Ziya Demirci
Keyword(s):  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Society Score ◽  
Oxford Knee Score ◽  
Functional Results ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is developed for the treatment of unicompartment arthrosis. Participation of multi compartments to the disease and patello-femoral arthrosis classically form a contraindication for this surgery. Different opinions were reported in literature on this subject. In this study, the effects of the presence of patello-femoral arthrosis on post-operative clinical and functional outcomes and revision process were investigated. Method: Pre-operative magnetic resonance (MR) images of 52 patients undergone medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty between the years of 2011-2016 who completed minimum 6 months of follow-up period were evaluated. According to the presence of patello-femoral arthrosis, patients were classified into groups as non-arthrosis, grade 1-2 and grade 3-4. Statistical comparison were performed on knee society score (KSS), functional knee society score (fKSS), Oxford knee score (OKS), visual analog scale (VAS) score and post-operative joint range of motion (ROM) results. Results: 24 of 52 patients had no patello-femoral arthrosis. 13 patients were diagnosed with grade 1-2 and 15 patients were diagnosed with grade 3-4 patello-femoral arthrosis. No statistically significant difference was observed in patello-femoral arthrosis groups in average post-operative KSS, fKSS, OKS, VAS values. No revision proceeding was demonstrated in regression analysis. Conclusion: The results obtained from this study demonstrated that patello-femoral arthrosis has no effect on clinical and functional results. Yet, it is also considered that there is no factor to affect the implant survival rate. Having that said, when the number of patients and relatively short follow-up periods are considered, it is our opinion that new studies are required in this matter. [Figure: see text]

scholarly journals Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Minimal Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the Forgotten Joint Score

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 324
Author(s):  
Umile Giuseppe Longo ◽  
Sergio De Salvatore ◽  
Vincenzo Candela ◽  
Alessandra Berton ◽  
Carlo Casciaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Minimal Important Difference ◽  
Oxford Knee Score ◽  
Meaningful Improvement ◽  
The Real ◽  
Forgotten Joint Score ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Patient Acceptable Symptom State

Background and Objectives: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a valid alternative to total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) in selected cases. After surgery, patients’ experience and satisfaction were traditionally evaluated by pre- and postsurgical scores and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Otherwise, a statistically significant change does not necessarily correlate to a clinically meaningful improvement when measured using PROMs. To evaluate the real effect of a specific treatment and understand the difference between groups in a clinical trial, it is necessary to use a meaningful quantum of change on the score assessed. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) can provide this meaningful change. This paper aimed to calculate the MCID and the PASS of the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) after UKA. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 patients with a mean age 72.5 ± 6.4 years undergoing UKA were assessed preoperatively and six months postsurgery using the FJS-12 and the Oxford Knee Score (OKS). The baseline and 6-month postoperative scores were compared using the Wilcoxon signed ranks test. The correlation was calculated with Spearman’s rho. Both distribution-based approaches and anchor approaches were used to estimate MCID for the FJS-12. The 75th percentile and the Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve methods were used to calculate the PASS of FJS-12. Results: MCID estimates for normalized FJS-12 for UKA ranged from 5.68 to 19.82. The threshold of the FJS-12 with ROC method was 72.92 (AUC = 0.76). The cut-off value computed with the 75th percentile approach was 92.71. Conclusions: The MCID and PASS represent valid tools to assess the real perception of clinical improvement in patients who underwent UKA. The MCID value of FJS-12 was 12.5 for patients who underwent UKA. The value of the PASS for the FJS-12 in patients who underwent UKA was 72.92.

scholarly journals High usage of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty negatively influences total knee arthroplasty revision rate

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Klasan ◽  
Mei Lin Tay ◽  
Chris Frampton ◽  
Simon William Young
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Rate ◽  
Oxford Knee Score ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Knee

Abstract Purpose Surgeons with higher medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) usage have lower UKA revision rates. However, an increase in UKA usage may cause a decrease of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) usage. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of UKA usage on revision rates and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) of UKA, TKA, and combined UKA + TKA results. Methods Using the New Zealand Registry Database, surgeons were divided into six groups based on their medial UKA usage: < 1%, 1–5%, 5–10%, 10–20%, 20–30% and > 30%. A comparison of UKA, TKA and UKA + TKA revision rates and PROMs using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) was performed. Results A total of 91,895 knee arthroplasties were identified, of which 8,271 were UKA (9.0%). Surgeons with higher UKA usage had lower UKA revision rates, but higher TKA revision rates. The lowest TKA and combined UKA + TKA revision rates were observed for surgeons performing 1–5% UKA, compared to the highest TKA and UKA + TKA revision rates which were seen for surgeons using > 30% UKA (p < 0.001 TKA; p < 0.001 UKA + TKA). No clinically important differences in UKA + TKA OKS scores were seen between UKA usage groups at 6 months, 5 years, or 10 years. Conclusion Surgeons with higher medial UKA usage have lower UKA revision rates; however, this comes at the cost of a higher combined UKA + TKA revision rate that is proportionate to the UKA usage. There was no difference in TKA + UKA OKS scores between UKA usage groups. A small increase in TKA revision rate was observed for high-volume UKA users (> 30%), when compared to other UKA usage clusters. A significant decrease in UKA revision rate observed in high-volume UKA surgeons offsets the slight increase in TKA revision rate, suggesting that UKA should be performed by specialist UKA surgeons. Level of evidence III, Retrospective therapeutic study.

Patient-acceptable symptom state for reporting outcomes following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 103-B (8) ◽  
pp. 1367-1372
Author(s):  
Kevin D. Plancher ◽  
Jasmine E. Brite ◽  
Karen K. Briggs ◽  
Stephanie C. Petterson
Keyword(s):  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Intact Group ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Acceptable Symptom State ◽  
Acl Deficient ◽  
Deficient Group

Aims The patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) is a level of wellbeing, which is measured by the patient. The aim of this study was to determine if the proportion of patients who achieved an acceptable level of function (PASS) after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) was different based on the status of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) at the time of surgery. Methods A total of 114 patients who underwent UKA for isolated medial osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee were included in the study. Their mean age was 65 years (SD 10). No patient underwent a bilateral procedure. Those who had undergone ACL reconstruction during the previous five years were excluded. The Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living (KOOS ADL) function score was used as the primary outcome measure with a PASS of 87.5, as described for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients completed all other KOOS subscales, Lysholm score, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and the Veterans Rand 12-item health survey score. Failure was defined as conversion to TKA. Results Survivorship at ten years was 97% in both the ACL-deficient and ACL-intact groups. The mean survival was 16.1 years (95% confidence interval (CI) 15.3 to 16.8) for the ACL-deficient group and 15.6 years (95% CI 14.8 to 16.361) for the ACL-intact group (p = 0.878). At a mean of nine years (SD 3.5) in the ACL-deficient group, 32 patients (87%) reached the PASS for the KOOS ADL. In the ACL-intact group, at a mean of 8.6 years (SD 3) follow-up, 63 patients (85%) reached PASS for the KOOS ADL. There was no significant difference in the percentage of patients who reached PASS for all KOOS subscales and Lysholm between the two groups. Conclusion PASS was achieved in 85% of all UKAs for KOOS ADL, similar to reports for TKA. Fixed-bearing, medial, non-robotically-assisted UKA resulted in 97% survival at ten years in both the ACL-deficient and ACL-intact groups. There was no significant difference in all outcomes between the two groups. Understanding PASS will allow better communication between surgeons and patients to improve the surgical management of patients with single compartment OA of the knee. This study provides mid- to long-term data supporting the use of PASS to document outcomes following UKA. PASS was met in more than 85% of patients with no differences between ACL-deficient and ACL-intact knees at a mean follow-up of nine years. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(8):1367–1372.

The effect of tibial and femoral component coronal alignment on clinical outcomes and survivorship in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 103-B (2) ◽  
pp. 338-346
Author(s):  
Yong Zhi Khow ◽  
Ming Han Lincoln Liow ◽  
Merrill Lee ◽  
Jerry Yongqiang Chen ◽  
Ngai Nung Lo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Component ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Oxford Knee Score ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Knee Score ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties ◽  
Implant Survivorship ◽  
Patient Reported

Aims This study aimed to identify the tibial component and femoral component coronal angles (TCCAs and FCCAs), which concomitantly are associated with the best outcomes and survivorship in a cohort of fixed-bearing, cemented, medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs). We also investigated the potential two-way interactions between the TCCA and FCCA. Methods Prospectively collected registry data involving 264 UKAs from a single institution were analyzed. The TCCAs and FCCAs were measured on postoperative radiographs and absolute angles were analyzed. Clinical assessment at six months, two years, and ten years was undertaken using the Knee Society Knee score (KSKS) and Knee Society Function score (KSFS), the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36), and range of motion (ROM). Fulfilment of expectations and satisfaction was also recorded. Implant survivorship was reviewed at a mean follow-up of 14 years (12 to 16). Multivariate regression models included covariates, TCCA, FCCA, and two-way interactions between them. Partial residual graphs were generated to identify angles associated with the best outcomes. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare implant survivorship between groups. Results Significant two-way interaction effects between TCCA and FCCA were identified. Adjusted for each other and their interaction, a TCCA of between 2° and 4° and a FCCA of between 0° and 2° were found to be associated with the greatest improvements in knee scores and the probability of fulfilling expectations and satisfaction at ten years. Patients in the optimal group whose TCCA and FCCA were between 2° and 4°, and 0° and 2°, respectively, had a significant survival benefit at 15 years compared with the non-optimal group (optimal: survival = 100% vs non-optimal: survival = 92%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 88% to 96%). Conclusion Significant two-way interactions between the TCCA and FCCA demonstrate the importance of evaluating the alignment of the components concomitantly in future studies. By doing so, we found that patients who concomitantly had both a TCCA of between 2° and 4° and a FCCA of between 0° and 2° had the best patient-reported outcome measures at ten years and better survivorship at 15 years. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):338–346.

scholarly journals Short-term effectiveness of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in young patients aged less than or equal to 60 years

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 230949902094511
Author(s):  
Fangxing Wang ◽  
Huaming Xue ◽  
Tong Ma ◽  
Tao Wen ◽  
Tao Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Oxford Knee Score ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Visual Analogue Score ◽  
Midterm Results ◽  
Effective Treatment Option ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee ◽  
Before And After

Purpose: The treatment for young patients with advanced knee arthritis by Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (Oxford-UKA) is still controversial. A relative few studies were published about Asian patients. We evaluated midterm results of Oxford-UKA in young patients aged less than or equal to 60 years. Methods: Between December 2009 and December 2018, 95 patients (109 knees) (mean age 57.48 years; range: 33–60 years) were included. The mean follow-up period was 3.0 years (range: 1.0–9.5 years). The functional outcomes and pain score of the knee before and after surgery were examined. Results: To the last follow-up, no patient died, six patients (nine knees) were lost and one patient underwent total knee revision in case of unexplained postoperative pain. The patients demonstrated significant improvement in range of knee motion (103.65 vs. 115.96, p < 0.05), Oxford Knee Score (40.0 vs. 14.4, p < 0.05), Hospital for Special Surgery Score (56.0 vs. 85.7, p < 0.05), and Visual Analogue Score (VAS) (5.23 vs. 1.08, p < 0.05) before and after surgery. Conclusion: Our midterm results showed that the Oxford-UKA was a reliable and effective treatment option for young patients aged less than or equal to 60 years with anterior medial osteoarthritis. The knee pain can be effectively relieved and excellent functional activities of the knee joint can be obtained after surgery.

scholarly journals Robotic-assisted vs conventional surgery in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a clinical and radiological study

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Negrín ◽  
Jaime Duboy ◽  
Magaly Iñiguez ◽  
Nicolás O. Reyes ◽  
Maximiliano Barahona ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Oxford Knee Score ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Component Size ◽  
Radiological Parameters ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee

Abstract Background The use of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has increased and new technologies have been developed to improve patient survival and satisfaction, soft tissue balance, alignment, and component size. Robot-assisted systems offer an increase in surgical precision and accuracy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the precision of component position using five radiological parameters in conventional and robotic-assisted medial UKA using the NAVIO system. Methods A cohort study was designed for patients who underwent medial UKA between April 2017 and March 2019 in a single center. Patients were allocated in the conventional (UKA-C) or robotic-assisted (UKA-R) group. The variables analyzed were age, gender, affected knee side, length of hospital stay, surgical time, and radiological measurements such as anatomical medial distal femoral angle (aMDFA), anatomical medial proximal tibial angle (aMPTA), tibial slope, the sagittal femoral angle, and the component size. A target was defined for each measurement, and a successful UKA was defined if at least four radiological measures were on target after surgery. Also, patients’ reported outcomes were evaluated using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and a numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain. Results Thirty-four patients were included, 18 of them underwent UKA-R. The success rate for UKA in the UKA-R group was 87%; meanwhile, in the UKA-C group this was 28%, this difference was significant and powered (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.001; 1 − β = 0.95). Also, a 5-point difference in favor of the UKA-R group in the median OKS (p = 0.01), and a significantly lower median NRS for pain (p < 0.000) were found after surgery. Conclusions UKA-R achieved more precision in the radiological parameters’ measure in this study. Also, UKA-R has a trend towards a better OKS and a lower NRS for pain at short-term follow-up.

scholarly journals CLINICAL OUTCOMES AFTER UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY FOR OSTEONECROSIS OF THE KNEE

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-16
Author(s):  
TOMOYUKI KAMENAGA ◽  
TAKAFUMI HIRANAKA ◽  
YUICHI HIDA ◽  
TAKAAKI FUJISHIRO ◽  
KOJI OKAMOTO
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoral Condyle ◽  
Oxford Knee Score ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Necrotic Lesion ◽  
Radiographic Findings ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
Unicompartmental Knee

ABSTRACT Objective: Although the mobile-bearing Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (OUKA) seems an appropriate procedure to treat spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee (SONK), aseptic tibial component loosening was the leading cause for medial UKA failure. This study aimed to observe short-term and midterm clinical outcomes following OUKA and determine whether tibial lesion affects the procedure clinical and radiographic outcomes. Methods: Sixty patients (mean age 73.1 ± 6.6 years) diagnosed with SONK in the medial femoral condyle and treated with OUKA were separated into two groups using T1-weighted preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): group F (necrotic lesion confined to the femur) and group T (necrotic lesion spread to the tibia). The Oxford Knee Score (OKS), maximum flexion angle (MFA), and radiographic findings (radiolucent line and subsidence) were compared between the two groups using unpaired t-test. Results: Both groups showed significant improvement in OKS and MFA values at the final follow-up, but without significant differences in the clinical and radiographic outcomes. Conclusion: OUKA is a reliable treatment procedure for SONK in the short and midterm. The presence of tibial lesions on preoperative MRI does not affect postoperative radiographic and clinical outcomes. Level of Evidence IV, Case Series.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document