Automated continuous monitoring of drug dissolution process using a flow injection on-line dialysis sampling - solvent extraction separation spectrophotometric system

1999 ◽  
Vol 364 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qun Fang ◽  
Yu-Qing Sun ◽  
Zhao-Lun Fang
Keyword(s):  
Solvent Extraction ◽  
Flow Injection ◽  
Continuous Monitoring ◽  
Drug Dissolution ◽  
Dissolution Process ◽  
Extraction Separation ◽  
On Line

Continuous monitoring in drug dissolution testing using flow injection systems

1999 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 261-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhao-Lun Fang ◽  
Qun Fang ◽  
Xue-Zhu Liu ◽  
Heng-Wu Chen ◽  
Chun-Lei Liu
Keyword(s):  
Flow Injection ◽  
Continuous Monitoring ◽  
Drug Dissolution ◽  
Dissolution Testing

scholarly journals Comparison of Flow Injection-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS for the Determination of Ochratoxin A

Toxins ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 547
Author(s):  
Kai Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Ochratoxin A ◽  
Flow Injection ◽  
Internal Standard ◽  
Grape Juice ◽  
Tandem Mass ◽  
Triple Quadrupole ◽  
On Line ◽  
Red Grape Juice ◽  
Red Grape

Two methods for measuring ochratoxin A in corn, oat, and grape juice were developed and compared. Flow injection (FI) and on-line liquid chromatography (LC) performances were evaluated separately, with both methods using a triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer (MS/MS) for quantitation. Samples were fortified with 13C uniformly labeled ochratoxin A as the internal standard (13C-IS) and prepared by dilution and filtration, followed by FI- and LC-MS/MS analysis. For the LC-MS/MS method, which had a 10 min run time/sample, recoveries of ochratoxin A fortified at 1, 5, 20, and 100 ppb in corn, oat, red grape juice, and white grape juice ranged from 100% to 117% with RSDs < 9%. The analysis time of the FI-MS/MS method was <60 s/sample, however, the method could not detect ochratoxin A at the lowest fortification concentration, 1 ppb, in all tested matrix sources. At 5, 20, and 100 ppb, recoveries by FI-MS/MS ranged from 79 to 117% with RSDs < 15%. The FI-MS/MS method also had ~5× higher solvent and matrix-dependent instrument detection limits (0.12–0.35 ppb) compared to the LC-MS/MS method (0.02–0.06 ppb). In the analysis of incurred corn and oat samples, both methods generated comparable results within ±20% of reference values, however, the FI-MS/MS method failed to determine ochratoxin A in two incurred wheat flour samples due to co-eluted interferences due to the lack of chromatographic separation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document