Nonaplex real-time PCR detection of Listeria monocytogenes, Campylobacter, Salmonella and enteropathogene E. coli after universal enrichment in food samples

2013 ◽  
Vol 237 (3) ◽  
pp. 315-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
René Köppel ◽  
Agne Rüegg Kuslyte ◽  
Ingrid Tolido ◽  
Jürg Schmid ◽  
Gabriela Marti
2008 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin O’ Grady ◽  
Sara Sedano-Balbás ◽  
Majella Maher ◽  
Terry Smith ◽  
Thomas Barry

2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 304-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Orsolya Erdősi ◽  
Katalin Szakmár ◽  
Olivér Reichart ◽  
Zsuzsanna Szili ◽  
Noémi László ◽  
...  

The incidence of outbreaks of foodborne listeriosis has indicated the need for a reliable and rapid detection of the microbe in different foodstuffs. A method combining redox potential measurement and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was developed to detectListeria monocytogenesin artificially contaminated raw milk and soft cheese. Food samples of 25 g or 25 ml were homogenised in 225 ml of Listeria Enrichment Broth (LEB) with Oxford supplement, and the redox potential measurement technique was applied. ForListeriaspecies the measuring time was maximum 34 h. The absence ofL. monocytogenescould reliably be proven by the redox potential measurement method, butListeria innocuaandBacillus subtiliscould not be differentiated fromL. monocytogeneson the basis of the redox curves. The presence ofL. monocytogeneshad to be confirmed by real-time PCR. The combination of these two methods proved to detect < 10 cfu/g ofL. monocytogenesin a cost- and time-effective manner. This method can potentially be used as an alternative to the standard nutrient method for the rapid detection ofL. monocytogenesin food.


2003 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 1844-1846 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loree C. Heller ◽  
Carisa R. Davis ◽  
K. Kealy Peak ◽  
David Wingfield ◽  
Andrew C. Cannons ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT In this study, food samples were intentionally contaminated with Escherichia coli O157:H7, and then DNA was isolated by using four commercial kits. The isolated DNA samples were compared by using real-time PCR detection of the Shiga toxin genes. The four kits tested worked similarly.


2005 ◽  
Vol 107 (1) ◽  
pp. 332-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathaniel C. Cady ◽  
Scott Stelick ◽  
Madanagopal V. Kunnavakkam ◽  
Carl A. Batt

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document