Value of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation with or without percutaneous vertebroplasty for pain relief and functional recovery in painful bone metastases

2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frédéric Clarençon ◽  
Betty Jean ◽  
Hang-Phuong Pham ◽  
Evelyne Cormier ◽  
Gilbert Bensimon ◽  
...  
10.15417/373 ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 164
Author(s):  
German Garabano ◽  
Gerardo Sola ◽  
Ignacio Fita ◽  
Pablo Sarmiento ◽  
Hernan Del Sel

<p><strong>Introducción:</strong> Existen diferentes modalidades de tratamiento para las metástasis (mtts) óseas y el dolor generado por estas, con diferentes resultados. La ablación percutánea por radiofrecuencia (APRF) guiada por tomografía es una de ellas. El objetivo de este reporte fue evaluar retrospectivamente los resultados iniciales utilizando la APRF, focalizando en el alivio del dolor, mostrando detalles de la técnica quirúrgica.</p><p><strong>Materiales:</strong> se trataron 18 pacientes con un promedio de edad de 59,2 anos y un seguimiento de 15 meses. Nueve mtts se ubicaron en fémur, 4 en raquis dorsal / lumbar, 3 en escápula y 2 en Ilíaco, siendo su origen el Ca de Mama en 7 casos, pulmón en 4, Rinon en 4 y 3 en Tiroides. Las mtts en raquis se encontraron a mas de 10mm del conducto medular y las de huesos largos presentaron bajo riesgo de fractura. El dolor fue evaluado mediante la Escala Visual Análoga en el preoperatorio, a los 2, 7 y 30 días, y luego a los 3 y 6 meses. A todos se les realizo APRF guiada por tomografía con el equipo Valleylab utilizando la aguja Rita para lesiones &gt; 3cm o CoolTip para las &lt;3cm.</p><p><strong>Resultados:</strong> la puntuación del dolor preoperatorio fue de 8,33 en promedio, pasando a 5 a la semana de la ablación. Al mes fue de 2 puntos, resultando igual a los 3 y 6 meses con una puntuación de 1. El procedimiento tubo excelente tolerancia y no hubieron complicaciones. Hubieron dos recidivas a las que se les realizó una Endoprótesis no convencional de fémur proximal y de rodilla respectivamente, evolucionando favorablemente.</p><p><strong>Conclusión:</strong> la APRF guiada por tomografía impresiona una herramienta prometedora, sencilla y eficaz en el tratamiento de estas lesiones, logrando un excelente control del dolor con muy buena tolerancia por parte del paciente.</p><p> </p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12086-12086
Author(s):  
Jason Levy ◽  
Elizabeth David ◽  
Thomas Hopkins ◽  
Jonathan Morris ◽  
Nam D. Tran ◽  
...  

12086 Background: Patients with bone metastases may experience pain and decreased quality of life. Standard of care therapies such as radiation therapy could take weeks for pain relief and carry a risk of radiation induced fracture. Minimally invasive percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have been shown in small observational studies to be an alternative treatment for bone metastases. We report the results of the OPuS One trial evaluating RFA for the palliative treatment of patients with painful bone metastases. Methods: OPuS One (NCT03249584) was a multicenter prospective trial. 218 subjects with painful bone metastases (≥ 4/10 worst pain scores, Brief Pain Inventory [BPI], at target treated site) were enrolled from 15 sites. RFA was performed under image guidance at one or two locations. Vertebral augmentation was followed based on physician’s discretion. Subjects’ pain (BPI) and quality of life (EQ-5D) scores were calculated in subjects at three days, one week, and one, three, six, and 12 months post RFA. Rate of complete (0 pain score at treated site with no concomitant analgesic increase) and partial responders (≥ 2 pain score reduction without analgesic increase or analgesic reduction of ≥ 25% from baseline) were calculated. Device-, procedure-, and/or therapy-related adverse events (AEs) were collected. Results: 206 subjects, 113 (55%) female and 93 (45%) males (mean age was 63.7 years) were treated with RFA. Most common primary cancers were breast (23%), lung (23%), and kidney (10%). 184 (89%) subjects were treated for metastatic lesions involving the thoracolumbar spine and 22 (11%) subjects were treated for iliac crest, periacetabulum, sacrum or mixed vertebral and pelvic location. 99% (262/264) of RFA procedures were technically successful and 97% were followed by vertebral augmentation. Subjects reported significant improvement in worst pain from baseline at 7.8 to 5.5, 4.7, 3.6, 3.2, 2.4, and 2.6 at three days, one week and one, three, six, and 12 months post RFA, respectively (p < 0.0001 for all visits). Significant improvements were also seen in average pain (p < 0.0001 for all visits), pain interference (p < 0.0001 for all visits), and quality of life scores (p < 0.0001 for all visits). Overall response rates were 53%, 58%, 61%, 63%, 70%, and 75% at three days, one week, one month, three months, six months, and twelve months post RFA, respectively. Six AEs were reported with three as serious: intra-abdominal fluid collection, pneumonia and respiratory failure. 82 deaths were reported during the study, none were related to the device, therapy, and/or procedure. No skeletal related events were reported. Conclusions: In a large prospective multicenter trial, OPuS One, RFA provided rapid, significant, and durable improvements in pain relief and quality of life up to 12 months. Clinical trial information: NCT03249584.


2004 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyriaki Pistevou-Gompaki ◽  
Vassilis E. Kouloulias ◽  
Charalambos Varveris ◽  
Kyriaki Mystakidou ◽  
Grigoris Georgakopoulos ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9101-9101
Author(s):  
D. E. Dupuy ◽  
D. Liu ◽  
D. Hartfeil ◽  
L. Hanna ◽  
J. Blume ◽  
...  

9101 Background: Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) can destroy tissue in a defined area. Single institutions have reported that RFA can reduce pain from bone metastases. To confirm this, the American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) completed a multicenter study of RFA for bone metastases. Methods: Eligible patients had bone pain in one dominant site: tumor size < 8 cm, and location > 1 cm from the spinal cord or cauda equina. RFA was performed under CT guidance. The Memorial Pain Assessment Card was used prior to RFA and repeated daily for two weeks, and at 1 and 3 months after RFA. AEs were recorded in addition to four different pain assessment measures: pain relief, patient mood, pain intensity, and pain severity. Results: Fifty-six patients had RFA at 9 centers. Metastatic sites were pelvis (24), chest wall (19), thoracolumbar spine (8), and extremities (5). Six out of 56 patients experienced at least one adverse event of grade 3 or higher, yielding an AE rate of 10.7% (95%CI is 2.6% to18.8%). AEs attributed directly to RFA were nerve injury in 2 patients. Of the 56 participants, 43 completed the 1 month follow-up and 33 completed the 3 month follow-up. At the time of this analysis, assuming that missing data were missing at random and after adjusting for all covariates, RFA showed significant effect in reducing pain at 1 and 3 month follow-up for all 4 pain assessment measures. The average increase in pain relief from pre-RFA to 1 month follow-up is 26.4 (P<0.0001) and the increase from pre-RFA to 3 month follow-up is 17.2 (P=0.003). The average increase in mood from pre-RFA to 1 month follow-up is 21.5 (P<0.0001) and the increase from pre-RFA to 3 month follow-up is 16.3 (P=0.001). The average decrease in pain intensity from pre-RFA to 1 month follow-up is 25.9 (P<0.0001) and the decrease from pre-RFA to 3 month follow-up is 13.0 (P=0.02). The odds of being in lower pain severity at 1 month follow-up is 12.6 (P<.0001) times higher than that at pre-RFA, and the odds at 3 month follow-up is 7.1 (P<0.0001) times higher than that at pre- RFA. Conclusions: This cooperative group trial confirms that RFA can safely palliate pain due to bone metastases. ACRIN receives funding from the National Cancer Institute through the grants U01 CA079778 and U01 CA080098. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2005 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 578-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoyuki Toyota ◽  
Akira Naito ◽  
Hideaki Kakizawa ◽  
Masashi Hieda ◽  
Nobuhiko Hirai ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 293-299
Author(s):  
Ana Paula Narata ◽  
Olivier Brina ◽  
Denis Herbretau ◽  
Jean-Philippe Cottier ◽  
Pierre-Yves Dietrich ◽  
...  

The pain management in oncologic patients requires a multidisciplinary approach. Considering bone metastases, multiple myeloma and lymphoma, percutaneous procedures like vertebroplasty can provide rapid pain relief. However, percutaneous vertebroplasty must be placed in order to not delay systemic therapy or other modalities of treatment. In this article, we described our 15 years’ experience in collaborating with a multidisciplinary team, reviewing literature and special issues percutaneous vertebroplasty for spinal tumoral fractures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document