Invited Discussion on: Opioid Prescribing Habits and Pain Management among Aesthetic Surgeons by Sherif et al.

Author(s):  
Malcolm Z. Roth ◽  
Kimberly Fiscella
Author(s):  
Rami D. Sherif ◽  
Jeffrey Lisiecki ◽  
Jennifer Waljee ◽  
Robert H. Gilman

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i48-i49
Author(s):  
S Visram ◽  
J Saini ◽  
R Mandvia

Abstract Introduction Opioid class drugs are a commonly prescribed form of analgesic widely used in the treatment of acute, cancer and chronic non-cancer pain. Up to 90% of individuals presenting to pain centres receive opioids, with doctors in the UK prescribing more and stronger opioids (1). Concern is increasing that patients with chronic pain are inappropriately being moved up the WHO ‘analgesic ladder’, originally developed for cancer pain, without considering alternatives to medications, (2). UK guidelines on chronic non-cancer pain management recommend weak opioids as a second-line treatment, when the first-line non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs / paracetamol) ineffective, and for short-term use only. A UK educational outreach programme by the name IMPACT (Improving Medicines and Polypharmacy Appropriateness Clinical Tool) was conducted on pain management. This research evaluated the IMPACT campaign, analysing the educational impact on the prescribing of morphine, tramadol and other high-cost opioids, in the Walsall CCG. Methods Standardised training material was delivered to 50 practices between December 2018 and June 2019 by IMPACT pharmacists. The training included a presentation on pain control, including dissemination of local and national guidelines, management of neuropathic, low back pain and sciatica as well as advice for prescribers on prescribing opioids in long-term pain, with the evidence-base. Prescribing trends in primary care were also covered in the training, and clinicians were provided with resources to use in their practice. Data analysis included reviewing prescribing data and evaluating the educational intervention using feedback from participants gathered via anonymous questionnaires administered at the end of the training. Prescribing data analysis was conducted by Keele University’s Medicines Management team via the ePACT 2 system covering October 2018 to September 2019 (two months before and three months after the intervention) were presented onto graphs to form comparisons in prescribing trends of the Midland CCG compared to England. Results Questionnaires completed at the end of sessions showed high levels of satisfaction, with feedback indicating that participants found the session well presented, successful at highlighting key messages, and effective in using evidence-based practice. 88% of participants agreed the IMPACT campaign increased their understanding of the management and assessment of pain, and prescribing of opioids and other resources available to prescribers. The majority (85%) wished to see this form of education being repeated regularly in the future for other therapeutic areas. Analysis of the prescribing data demonstrated that the total volume of opioid analgesics decreased by 1.7% post-intervention in the Midlands CCG in response to the pharmacist-led educational intervention. As supported by literature, the use of educational strategies, including material dissemination and reminders as well as group educational outreach was effective in engaging clinicians, as demonstrated by the reduction in opioid prescribing and high GP satisfaction in this campaign. Conclusion The IMPACT campaign was effective at disseminating pain-specific guidelines for opioid prescribing to clinicians, leading to a decrease in overall prescribing of opioid analgesics. Educational outreach as an approach is practical and a valuable means to improve prescribing by continuing medical education. References 1. Els, C., Jackson, T., Kunyk, D., Lappi, V., Sonnenberg, B., Hagtvedt, R., Sharma, S., Kolahdooz, F. and Straube, S. (2017). Adverse events associated with medium- and long-term use of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. This provided the statistic of percentage receiving opioids that present to pain centres. 2. Heit, H. (2010). Tackling the Difficult Problem of Prescription Opioid Misuse. Annals of Internal Medicine, 152(11), p.747. Issues with prescriptions and inappropriate moving up the WHO ladder.


2021 ◽  
Vol 164 (4) ◽  
pp. 704-711
Author(s):  
Samantha Anne ◽  
Sandra A. Finestone ◽  
Allison Paisley ◽  
Taskin M. Monjur

This plain language summary explains pain management and careful use of opioids after common otolaryngology operations. The summary applies to patients of any age who need treatment for pain within 30 days after having a common otolaryngologic operation (having to do with the ear, nose, or throat). It is based on the 2021 “Clinical Practice Guideline: Opioid Prescribing for Analgesia After Common Otolaryngology Operations.” This guideline uses available research to best advise health care providers, and it includes recommendations that are explained in this summary. Recommendations may not apply to every patient but can be used to facilitate shared decision making between patients and their health care providers.


Pain Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 1400-1407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam N Romman ◽  
Connie M Hsu ◽  
Lin-Na Chou ◽  
Yong-Fang Kuo ◽  
Rene Przkora ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective To examine opioid prescribing frequency and trends to Medicare Part D enrollees from 2013 to 2017 by medical specialty and provider type. Methods We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional, specialty- and provider-level analysis of Medicare Part D prescriber data for opioid claims from 2013 to 2017. We analyzed opioid claims and prescribing trends for specialties accounting for ≥1% of all opioid claims. Results From 2013 to 2017, pain management providers increased Medicare Part D opioid claims by 27.3% to 1,140 mean claims per provider in 2017; physical medicine and rehabilitation providers increased opioid claims 16.9% to 511 mean claims per provider in 2017. Every other medical specialty decreased opioid claims over this period, with emergency medicine (–19.9%) and orthopedic surgery (–16.0%) dropping opioid claims more than any specialty. Physicians overall decreased opioid claims per provider by –5.2%. Meanwhile, opioid claims among both dentists (+5.6%) and nonphysician providers (+10.2%) increased during this period. Conclusions From 2013 to 2017, pain management and PMR increased opioid claims to Medicare Part D enrollees, whereas physicians in every other specialty decreased opioid prescribing. Dentists and nonphysician providers also increased opioid prescribing. Overall, opioid claims to Medicare Part D enrollees decreased and continue to drop at faster rates.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (22;3) ◽  
pp. 229-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yola Moride

Background: Canada and the United States have the highest levels of prescription opioid consumption in the world. In an attempt to curb the opioid epidemic, a variety of interventions have been implemented. Thus far, evidence regarding their effectiveness has not been consolidated. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to: 1) identify interventions that target opioid prescribing; 2) assess and compare the effectiveness of interventions on opioid prescription and related harms; 3) determine the methodological quality of evaluation studies. Study Design: The study involved a systematic review of the literature including bibliographical databases and gray literature sources. Setting: Systematic review including bibliographical databases and gray literature sources. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS databases from January 1, 2005 to September 23, 2016 for any intervention that targeted the prescription of opioids. We also examined websites of relevant organizations and scanned bibliographies of included articles and reviews for additional references. The target population was that of all health care providers (HCPs) or users of opioids with no restriction on indication. Endpoints were those related to process (implementation), outcomes (effectiveness), or impact. Sources were screened independently by 2 reviewers using pre-defined eligibility criteria. Synthesis of findings was qualitative; no pooling of results was conducted. Results: Literature search yielded 12,278 unique sources. Of these, 142 were retained. During full-text review, 75 were further excluded. Searches of the gray literature and bibliographies yielded 49 additional sources. Thus, a total of 95 distinct interventions were identified. Over half consisted of prescription monitoring programs (PMPs) and mainly targeted HCPs. Evaluation studies addressed mainly opioid prescription rate (30.6%), opioid use (19.4%), or doctor shopping or diversion (9.7%). Fewer studies considered overdose death (9.7%), abuse (9.7%), misuse (4.2%), or diversion (5.6%). Study designs consisted of cross-sectional surveys (23.3%), pre-post intervention (26.7%), or time series without a comparison group (13.3%), which limit the robustness of the evidence. Although PMPs and policies have been associated with a reduction in opioid prescription, their impact on appropriateness of use according to clinical guidelines and restriction of access to patients in need is inconsistent. Continuing medical education (CME) and pain management programs were found effective in improving chronic pain management, but studies were conducted in specific settings. The impact of interventions on abuse and overdose-death is conflicting. Limitations: Due to the very large number of publications and programs found, it was difficult to compare interventions owing to the heterogeneity of the programs and to the methodologies of evaluation studies. No assessment of publication bias was done in the review. Conclusions: Evidence of effectiveness of interventions targeting the prescription of opioids is scarce in the literature. Although PMPs have been associated with a reduction in the overall prescription rates of Schedule II opioids, their impact on the appropriateness of use taking into consideration benefits, misuse, legal and illegal use remains elusive. Our review suggests that existing interventions have not addressed all determinants of inappropriate opioid prescribing and usage. A well-described theoretical framework would be the backdrop against which targeted interventions or policies may be developed. Key words: Opioid, prescription, abuse, misuse, diversion, interventions, prescription monitoring programs


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 487-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Mario Aulet ◽  
Vanessa Trieu ◽  
Gary P. Landrigan ◽  
Donna J. Millay

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Dergham ◽  
Greg Hosier ◽  
Melanie Jaeger ◽  
J. Curtis Nickel ◽  
D. Robert Siemens ◽  
...  

Introduction: Prior studies have identified significant knowledge gaps in acute and chronic pain management among graduating urology residents as of five years ago. Since then, there has been increasing awareness of the impact of excessive opioid prescribing on long-term narcotic use and development of adverse narcotic-related events. However, it is unclear whether the attitudes and experience of graduating urology residents have changed. We set out to evaluate the attitudes and experience of graduating urology residents in prescribing opioid/non-opioid analgesia for acute (AP), chronic non-cancer (CnC), and chronic cancer (CC) pain. Methods: Graduating urology residents were surveyed at a review course in 2018. The survey consisted of open-ended and close-ended five-point Likert scale questions. Descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U-test, and Student’s t-test were performed. Results: A total of 32 PGY5 urology residents completed our survey (92% response rate). The vast majority agreed that formal training in managing AP/CnC/CC to be valuable (91/78/81%). Most find their training in CnC/CC management to be inadequate and are unaware of any opioid prescribing guidelines; 66% never counsel patients on how to dispose of excess opioids. In general, 88% are comfortable prescribing opioids, whereas most are very uncomfortable prescribing cannabis or antidepressants (100%/78%). Residents reported the Acute Pain Service as the highest-rated resource for information, and dedicated textbooks the least. Conclusions: This survey demonstrated that experience in pain management remains variable among urology residents. Knowledge gaps remain, particularly in the management of chronic cancer/non-cancer pain.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document