scholarly journals Correction to: Assessment of cervical spine involvement in rheumatoid arthritis patients in the era of biologics: a real-life, cross-sectional MRI study

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 923-923
Author(s):  
Csaba Oláh ◽  
Zsófia Kardos ◽  
László Kostyál ◽  
Katalin Hodosi ◽  
László Tamási ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 915-921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Csaba Oláh ◽  
Zsófia Kardos ◽  
László Kostyál ◽  
Katalin Hodosi ◽  
László Tamási ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Nessrine Akasbi ◽  
Amina Mounir ◽  
Francina Eddie Omboumahou Bakale ◽  
Samira El Fakir ◽  
Taoufik Harzy

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate in “real life” the efficacy and the tolerance of Tocilizumab (TCZ) in the treatment of rhumatoide arthritis (RA).Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study including patients with RA patients treated with TCZ at the commended dose of 8 mg/kg/ 4 weeks. The therapeutic response was evaluated by the EULAR DAS 28 ‐CRP/ VS at month 3 and month 6 of treatment.Results: RA was in most cases severe (76,5 %), seropositive (88,2 %) and erosive (81,3 %). TCZ was prescribed as an alternative to a previous biotherapy in 23 % of the patients and in monotherapy in 76, 5 % of the patients. After treatment follow-up at 3 and 6 months, the different parameters observed were significantly improved including: VAS (visual analogue scale) pain (p=0,000), CRP (mg/L) p=0,000), ESR (mmH1) (p=0,000), DAS 28 CRP (p=0,000), and DAS 28 ESR (p=0,000). Apart from a worsening of renal function in a patient contraindicated continuation of tocilizumab, no serious side effects were noted.Conclusion: Our study confirmed the efficacy and tolerance of TCZ therapy in Moroccan patients suffering from RA.Key words: rheumatoid arthritis, tocilizumab, efficacy, tolerance


2019 ◽  
pp. 089719001986915 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Paula M. Gomides ◽  
Cleandro P. Albuquerque ◽  
Ana B.V. Santos ◽  
Rodrigo B. C. Amorim ◽  
Manoel B. Bértolo ◽  
...  

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with high frequency of comorbidities and increased risk of polypharmacy. Although there is a great potential for complications, there is a gap in literature on polypharmacy in patients with rheumatic arthritis. Objective: To evaluate the prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy in a population in a real-life setting. Methods: A cross-sectional multicenter study was conducted in Brazil. Patients underwent clinical evaluation and medical records analysis. Polypharmacy was considered as a dependent variable. To test independent variables, we used Poisson regression. Results: We evaluated 792 patients (89% female, median age 56.6 years). Median duration of disease was 12.7 years, 78.73% had a positive rheumatoid factor. The median of disease activity score-28 was 3.5 (disease with mild activity), median of the clinical disease activity index score was 9, and median of health assessment questionnaire-disability index was 0.875; 47% used corticosteroids, 9.1% used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 90.9% used synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, 35.7% used biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). In total, 537 (67.9%) patients used 5 or more drugs. Polypharmacy showed a relationship with a number of comorbidities and use of specific drugs (corticosteroids, methotrexate, and biological DMARDs). Conclusion: We found a high prevalence of polypharmacy (67.9%) in RA. Solutions to management this problem should be stimulated.


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 579-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenshi Daimon ◽  
Hirokazu Fujiwara ◽  
Yuji Nishiwaki ◽  
Eijiro Okada ◽  
Kenya Nojiri ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 117954411875968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanan Sayed M Abozaid ◽  
Reham Alaa El-din Hassan ◽  
Waleed A Elmadany ◽  
Mohamed Aly Ismail ◽  
Dalia S Elgendy ◽  
...  

Background: Cervical spine involvement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can cause pain and disability, with a variety of neurologic signs and symptoms. Objectives: To investigate the relationship between structural cervical spine involvement in patients with RA with the age at disease onset and the degree of radiologic severity of RA measured by Larsen scoring. Patients and methods: This cross-sectional study included 50 adult patients with RA. Patients who complained or not complained from symptoms of cervical spine involvement in RA were included; we did X-ray of the cervical spine, hands, and feet; Larsen scoring method; disease activity score (DAS28); and Neck Disability Index. Results: The results revealed that patients with cervical involvement tend to be younger at their disease onset than those with no cervical involvement, as detected by cervical X-ray. The relation was significant P < .05 regarding all cervical involvements except for basilar invagination. Disease radiological severity (measured by Larsen score) significantly increases the risk for subaxial subluxation, P = .040. All other cervical complications of RA tend to have nonsignificant relation with disease severity. Using univariate binary regression analysis for risk factors for cervical involvement showed that the only probable risk factor for cervical involvement (detected by X-ray) in patients with RA is age at disease onset. Conclusions: The early age at disease onset tends to affect cervical spine involvement in patients with RA more than the disease radiological severity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1458.1-1458
Author(s):  
J. Rosas ◽  
A. Pons ◽  
J. M. Senabre Gallego ◽  
G. Santos Soler ◽  
J. A. Bernal ◽  
...  

Objectives:To assess the characteristics of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), who have withdrawn the last biological drug (bDMARD), and to know the reasons for withdrawal of treatment.Methods:Retrospective and cross-sectional study on December 31, 2019, of patients with RA, treated with any of the bDMARDs, including JAK (JAKi) inhibitor drugs, commonly used, from 1/1/2000 to 12/31/2019. General data were collected from patients, and RA: time of evolution, presence of rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA), type of bDMARD, time in bDMARD, and cause of withdrawal.Results:Of 252 patients, who have received some bDMARD, 81 (32%) patients had withdrawn on 12/31/2019. 62 (77%) patients were women, with a mean age at diagnosis of RA of 48 years (SD: 16.5 years) and 59.5 (15) years at the beginning of the first bDMARD (F1), with an average evolution of RA 10.2 (2.5) years. 68% and 74% of patients were positive for RF and ACPA, respectively.In 64 (79%) patients, bDMARD was withdrawn as second to fifth bDMARD received (F2 to F5): as F2: 37/81 (46%) patients, F3: 14 (18%), F4: 8 (10%) and as F5: (6%) patients.When comparing the last bDMARD received, before the suspension as F1 vs F2-F5, 95% vs. 61% of patients (p <0.0001), the drug was an anti-TNF (TNFi); Abatacept: 1 (1%) vs 9 (14%); Tocilizumab: 0% vs 8 (12%); Rituximab: 1 (1%) vs 5 (8%) and JAKi: 4 (5%) vs 3 (5%). The mean time in treatment with some bDMARD was 2.6 (SD: 3) years in the F1 group vs 1.7 (2) years in the F2-F5 group (p = 0.034). Among the F3-F5 patients, 9 (14%) patients had failed at 2 different previous therapeutic targets and 6 (9%) at 3 targets.No differences were detected between the F1 group vs F2-F5, regarding the causes of withdrawal of bDMARD: whether it had occurred due to 1) loss of efficacy (25/31% patients vs 19/30%); 2) adverse events (31/38% vs. 29/45%): infection: 18/81 (22%) patients, malignancy: 5 (6%), malaise/pain: 11 (14%), laboratory parameters alteration: 7 (9%), death: 5 (6%), others: 14 (17%); 3) change of address/loss of follow-up (20/25% vs. 7/11%) or by 4) voluntary abandonment of treatment by the patient (5/6% vs. 9/14%).Conclusion:1. 32% of patients with RA withdraw the bDMARD. 2. The group treated with TNFi withdraws it significantly higher among the F1 group. 3. Survival of bDMARD is significantly higher in group F1 compared to F2-F5. 4. No differences were detected between the groups regarding the cause of withdrawal of bDMARD. 25% -30% of patients withdraw it due to loss of follow-up or voluntary abandonment of bDMARD.Acknowledgments:The study was supported by a research grant from the Association for Research in Rheumatology of the Marina Baixa (AIRE-MB).Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2021 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavo Nogueira Schincariol Vicente ◽  
Ivânio Alves Pereira ◽  
Gláucio Ricardo Werner de Castro ◽  
Licia Maria Henrique da Mota ◽  
Ana Paula Carnieletto ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a common autoimmune systemic inflammatory disease. In addition to joint involvement, RA patients frequently have other comorbidities, such as cardiovascular diseases. Drugs used for RA treatment may increase or decrease the risk of a cardiovascular event. This study aims to analyze cardiovascular risk comorbidities in patients with RA and the correlation with the use of anti-rheumatic drugs. Methods Cross-sectional study conducted based on the real-life rheumatoid arthritis study database – REAL, a prospective observational cohort study. Associations between the use of anti-rheumatic drugs and the presence of comorbidities were represented by their prevalence ratio and evaluated using the Chi-square or Fisher’s Exact tests. Results We assessed 1116 patients, 89.4% women, mean age of 55.15 years and predominance of seropositive disease. 63.3% had some cardiovascular comorbidity, predominantly hypertension (49.9%). The use of glucocorticoids was observed in 47.4% of patients and there was a significant tendency of lower use of these drugs in the presence of dyslipidemia (PR: 0.790; p = 0.007). We observed that the presence of cardiovascular comorbidities was associated with higher use of bDMARDs (PR:1.147; p = 0.003). Conclusions The presence of cardiovascular risk comorbidities was confirmed to be higher in RA patients. Different treatment strategies using less glucocorticoids in the presence of dyslipidemia and more common use of bDMARDs in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities suggest that rheumatologists are aware of the potential influence of the DMARDs in the risk of cardiovascular event. Reinforcing these results, we highlight the need for a better baseline assessment to guide the choice of anti-rheumatic drugs in RA patients who have comorbidities.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 486.1-486
Author(s):  
X. Matthijssen ◽  
F. Wouters ◽  
N. Sidhu ◽  
E. Niemantsverdriet ◽  
A. van der Helm - van Mil

Background:Clinically evident tenosynovitis can be seen in established Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Imaging research has recently shown that tenosynovitis at small joints occurs in early RA, contributes to typical RA symptoms (including joint swelling) and is infrequent in healthy controls. Imaging-detectable tenosynovitis is often not recognizable at joint examination, hence its prevalence can therefore be underestimated.Objectives:We hypothesized that if MRI-detectable tenosynovitis is a true RA-feature, the sensitivity for RA is high, in both ACPA-positive and -negative RA, and lower in other diseases that are associated with enthesitis (such as Spondyloarthritis (SpA) and Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)). So far, no large MRI-study addressed these questions.Methods:Consecutive early arthritis patients (n=1211) from one health-care region underwent contrast-enhanced 1.5T MRI of hand and foot at diagnosis. MRIs were scored for synovitis and tenosynovitis by two readers blinded for clinical data. All included patients with ACPA-positive RA (n=250), ACPA-negative RA (n=282), PsA (n=88), SpA with peripheral arthritis (n=24), reactive arthritis (n=30) and self-limiting undifferentiated arthritis (UA;n=76) were studied. Sensitivity was calculated.Results:The sensitivity of tenosynovitis in RA was 85%; 88% for ACPA-positive RA and 82% for and ACPA-negative RA (p=0.19). The sensitivity for RA was significantly higher than for PsA (65%;p=0.001), SpA (53%;p<0.001), reactive arthritis (36%;p<0.001) and self-limiting UA (42%;p<0.001). The observed sensitivity of MRI-synovitis was 91% in RA and ranged 83-54% in the other groups.Conclusion:MRI-detected tenosynovitis has a high sensitivity for early ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative RA. This supports both juxta-articular (tenosynovitis) and intra-articular synovial involvement is characteristic for RA.Figure 1.Presence of tenosynovitis (in black) in wrist MCPs and MTPs, in rheumatoid arthritis, stratified for ACPA-status and compared to other diseases Legend: RA: Rheumatoïd arthritis; ACPA: anti-citrullinated protein antibodies; UA: undifferentiated arthritisDisclosure of Interests:None declared


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document