scholarly journals COVID-19, hydroxychloroquine and sudden cardiac death: implications for clinical practice in patients with rheumatic diseases

Author(s):  
Hussain Ahmed Raza ◽  
Javeria Tariq ◽  
Vikas Agarwal ◽  
Latika Gupta
2013 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 364-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire A. Martin ◽  
Christopher L.-H. Huang ◽  
Gareth D. K. Matthews

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Mates ◽  
I. Mademont-Soler ◽  
O. Campuzano ◽  
G. Sarquella-Brugada ◽  
E. Arbelo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zornitsa Shomanova ◽  
Bernhard Ohnewein ◽  
Christiane Schernthaner ◽  
Killian Höfer ◽  
Christian A. Pogoda ◽  
...  

Sudden cardiac death (SCD), most often induced by ventricular arrhythmias, is one of the main reasons for cardiovascular-related mortality. While coronary artery disease remains the leading cause of SCD, other pathologies like cardiomyopathies and, especially in the younger population, genetic disorders, are linked to arrhythmia-related mortality. Despite many efforts to enhance the efficiency of risk-stratification strategies, effective tools for risk assessment are still missing. Biomarkers have a major impact on clinical practice in various cardiac pathologies. While classic biomarkers like brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and troponins are integrated into daily clinical practice, inflammatory biomarkers may also be helpful for risk assessment. Indeed, several trials investigated their application for the prediction of arrhythmic events indicating promising results. Furthermore, in recent years, active research efforts have brought forward an increasingly large number of “novel and alternative” candidate markers of various pathophysiological origins. Investigations of these promising biological compounds have revealed encouraging results when evaluating the prediction of arrhythmic events. To elucidate this issue, we review current literature dealing with this topic. We highlight the potential of “classic” but also “novel” biomarkers as promising tools for arrhythmia prediction, which in the future might be integrated into clinical practice.


2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. S76
Author(s):  
Eugene S. Chung ◽  
Thomas G. Bartlett ◽  
Steven S. Gubin ◽  
Roger K. Muse ◽  
Maureen McGuire

EP Europace ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (FI2) ◽  
pp. f153-f161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shanat Baig ◽  
Nicky C Edward ◽  
Dipak Kotecha ◽  
Boyang Liu ◽  
Sabrina Nordin ◽  
...  

Kardiologiia ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 73-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Z. Golukhova ◽  
◽  
O. I. Gromova ◽  
N. I. Bulaeva ◽  
L. A. Bokeria ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
David O Arnar ◽  
Georges H Mairesse ◽  
Giuseppe Boriani ◽  
Hugh Calkins ◽  
Ashley Chin ◽  
...  

AbstractAsymptomatic arrhythmias are frequently encountered in clinical practice. Although studies specifically dedicated to these asymptomatic arrhythmias are lacking, many arrhythmias still require proper diagnostic and prognostic evaluation and treatment to avoid severe consequences, such as stroke or systemic emboli, heart failure, or sudden cardiac death. The present document reviews the evidence, where available, and attempts to reach a consensus, where evidence is insufficient or conflicting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document