Identifying the critical RNA binding proteins (RBPs) that elicit
Xist
mediated silencing has been a key goal in X inactivation research. Early studies implicated the Polycomb proteins, a family of factors linked to one of two major multiprotein complexes, PRC1 and PRC2 (Wang 2001
Nat. Genet.
28
, 371–375 (
doi:10.1038/ng574
); Silva 2003
Dev. Cell
4
, 481–495 (
doi:10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00068-6
); de Napoles 2004
Dev. Cell
7
, 663–676 (
doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2004.10.005
); Plath 2003
Science
300
, 131–135 (
doi:10.1126/science.1084274
)). PRC1 and PRC2 complexes catalyse specific histone post-translational modifications (PTMs), ubiquitylation of histone H2A at position lysine 119 (H2AK119u1) and methylation of histone H3 at position lysine 27 (H3K27me3), respectively, and accordingly, these modifications are highly enriched over the length of the inactive X chromosome (Xi). A key study proposed that PRC2 subunits bind directly to
Xist
RNA A-repeat element, a region located at the 5′ end of the transcript known to be required for
Xist
mediated silencing (Zhao 2008
Science
322
, 750–756 (
doi:10.1126/science.1163045
)). Subsequent recruitment of PRC1 was assumed to occur via recognition of PRC2 mediated H3K27me3 by the CBX subunit of PRC1, as has been shown to be the case at other Polycomb target loci (Cao 2002
Science
298
, 1039–1043 (
doi:10.1126/science.1076997
)). More recently, several reports have questioned aspects of the prevailing view, both in relation to the mechanism for Polycomb recruitment by
Xist
RNA and the contribution of the Polycomb pathway to
Xist
mediated silencing. In this article I provide an overview of our recent progress towards resolving these discrepancies.
This article is part of the themed issue ‘X-chromosome inactivation: a tribute to Mary Lyon’.