scholarly journals Srs2 helicase prevents the formation of toxic DNA damage during late prophase I of yeast meiosis

Chromosoma ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 128 (3) ◽  
pp. 453-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Sasanuma ◽  
Hana Subhan M. Sakurai ◽  
Yuko Furihata ◽  
Kiran Challa ◽  
Lira Palmer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Late Prophase ◽  
Prophase I ◽  
Srs2 Helicase ◽  
Yeast Meiosis

scholarly journals Srs2 helicase prevents the formation of toxic DNA damage during late prophase I of yeast meiosis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Sasanuma ◽  
Hana Subhan M. Sakurai ◽  
Yuko Furihata ◽  
Kiran Challa ◽  
Lira Palmer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Dna Recombination ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
Aggregate Formation ◽  
Late Prophase ◽  
Prophase I ◽  
Early Protein ◽  
Srs2 Helicase ◽  
Yeast Meiosis

AbstractProper repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs) is key to ensure proper chromosome segregation. In this study, we found that the deletion of the SRS2 gene, which encodes a DNA helicase necessary for the control of homologous recombination, induces aberrant chromosome segregation during budding yeast meiosis. This abnormal chromosome segregation in srs2 cells accompanies the formation of a novel DNA damage induced during late meiotic prophase-I. The damage may contain long stretches of single-stranded DNAs (ssDNAs), which lead to aggregate formation of a ssDNA binding protein, RPA, and a RecA homolog, Rad51, as well as other recombination proteins inside of the nuclei. The Rad51 aggregate formation in the srs2 mutant depends on the initiation of meiotic recombination and occurs in the absence of chromosome segregation. Importantly, as an early recombination intermediate, we detected a thin bridge of Rad51 between two Rad51 foci or among the foci in the srs2 mutant, which is rarely seen in wild type. These might be cytological manifestation of the connection of two DSB ends and multi-invasion. The DNA damage with Rad51 aggregates in the srs2 mutant is passed through anaphase-I and -II, suggesting the absence of DNA damage-induced cell-cycle arrest after the pachytene stage. We propose that Srs2 helicase resolves early protein-DNA recombination intermediates to suppress the formation of aberrant lethal DNA damage during late prophase-I.

Ultrastructure of meiosis and the spindle pole body cycle in freeze-substituted basidia of the smut fungi Ustilago maydis and Ustilago avenae

1992 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 629-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerry O'Donnell
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Spindle Pole Body ◽  
Ustilago Maydis ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Meiotic Spindle ◽  
Smut Fungi ◽  
Late Prophase ◽  
Prophase I ◽  
Pole Body ◽  
Middle Piece

Meiosis in the smut fungi Ustilago maydis and Ustilago avenae (Basidiomycota, Ustilaginales) was studied by electron microscopy of serial-sectioned freeze substituted basidia. At prophase I, a spindle pole body composed of two globular elements connected by a middle piece was attached to the extranuclear surface of each nucleus. Astral and spindle microtubules were initiated at each globular element at late prophase I to prometaphase I. During spindle initiation, the middle piece disappeared and interdigitating half-spindles entered the nucleoplasm, which was surrounded by discontinuous nuclear envelope together with perinuclear endoplasmic reticulum. Kinetochore pairs at metaphase I were analyzed to obtain a karyotype for each species. The meiotic spindle pole body replicational cycle is described. Key words: electron microscopy, freeze-substitution, meiosis, Ustilago, spindle pole body.

Intranuclear membranous inclusions in oocytes of a viviparous teleost (Xiphophorus helleri)

1976 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 325-334
Author(s):  
C. Azevedo
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Membrane ◽  
Inclusion Bodies ◽  
Intranuclear Inclusions ◽  
Late Prophase ◽  
Xiphophorus Helleri ◽  
Inner Nuclear Membrane ◽  
Prophase I ◽  
Fixed Material ◽  
Metabolic Phenomena

Intranuclear inclusions were observed in oocytes of Xiphophorus helleri during prophase I. In osmium-fixed leptotene nuclei, the inclusions were made up of groups of membrane-limited vesicles or tubules with pale contents, situated near the inner nuclear membrane with which some of them exhibited apparent continuities. In zygotene nuclei, larger vesicles also appeared bounded by two or three membranes and containing tubules apparently invaginated from their walls. In pachytene-dictyate nuclei most vesicular bodies had a wall formed by stratified membranes, or were entirely made up of membranous whorls. In glutaraldehyde-osmium fixed material some of these myeline-like bodies showed a peculiar arrangement, consisting of concentric bands each containing thick inner dense lamellae 2-0-3-0 nm thick and a 5-0 nm outer lamella. It is suggested that these inclusion bodies arise from the inner nuclear membrane of oocytes when cells start to grow intensely during prophase I. The bodies seem to become more complex at late prophase, probably by association of individual vesicles and the occurrence of multiple membrane invaginations, which may be related to active metabolic phenomena taking place at this stage in oocytes.

scholarly journals TOP-2 is differentially required for the proper maintenance of cohesin on meiotic chromosomes in C. elegans spermatogenesis and oogenesis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aimee Jaramillo-Lambert ◽  
Christine Kiely Rourke
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Topoisomerase Ii ◽  
Meiotic Chromosome ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Chromosome Length ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Late Prophase ◽  
Prophase I ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

During meiotic prophase I, accurate segregation of homologous chromosomes requires the establishment of a chromosomes with a meiosis-specific architecture. Sister chromatid cohesins and the enzyme Topoisomerase II are important components of meiotic chromosome axes, but the relationship of these proteins in the context of meiotic chromosome segregation is poorly defined. Here, we analyzed the role of Topoisomerase II (TOP-2) in the timely release of sister chromatid cohesins during spermatogenesis and oogenesis of Caenorhabditis elegans. We show that there is a different requirement for TOP-2 in meiosis of spermatogenesis and oogenesis. The loss-of-function mutation top-2(it7) results in premature REC-8 removal in spermatogenesis, but not oogenesis. This is due to a failure to maintain the HORMA-domain proteins HTP-1 and HTP-2 (HTP-1/2) on chromosome axes at diakinesis and mislocalization of the downstream components that control sister chromatid cohesion release including Aurora B kinase. In oogenesis, top-2(it7) causes a delay in the localization of Aurora B to oocyte chromosomes but can be rescued through premature activation of the maturation promoting factor via knock-down of the inhibitor kinase WEE-1.3. The delay in Aurora B localization is associated with an increase in the length of diakinesis chromosomes and wee-1.3 RNAi mediated rescue of Auorora B localization in top-2(it7) is associated with a decrease in chromosome length. Our results imply that the sex-specific effects of Topoisomerase II on sister chromatid cohesion release are due to differences in the temporal regulation of meiosis and chromosome structure in late prophase I in spermatogenesis and oogenesis.

scholarly journals The Main Role of Srs2 in DNA Repair Depends on Its Helicase Activity, Rather than on Its Interactions with PCNA or Rad51

mBio ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Bronstein ◽  
Lihi Gershon ◽  
Gilad Grinberg ◽  
Elisa Alonso-Perez ◽  
Martin Kupiec
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
Main Role ◽  
Helicase Domain ◽  
Helicase Activity ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Srs2 Helicase

ABSTRACTHomologous recombination (HR) is a mechanism that repairs a variety of DNA lesions. Under certain circumstances, however, HR can generate intermediates that can interfere with other cellular processes such as DNA transcription or replication. Cells have therefore developed pathways that abolish undesirable HR intermediates. TheSaccharomyces cerevisiaeyeast Srs2 helicase has a major role in one of these pathways. Srs2 also works during DNA replication and interacts with the clamp PCNA. The relative importance of Srs2’s helicase activity, Rad51 removal function, and PCNA interaction in genome stability remains unclear. We created a newSRS2allele [srs2(1-850)] that lacks the whole C terminus, containing the interaction site for Rad51 and PCNA and interactions with many other proteins. Thus, the new allele encodes an Srs2 protein bearing only the activity of the DNA helicase. We find that the interactions of Srs2 with Rad51 and PCNA are dispensable for the main role of Srs2 in the repair of DNA damage in vegetative cells and for proper completion of meiosis. On the other hand, it has been shown that in cells impaired for the DNA damage tolerance (DDT) pathways, Srs2 generates toxic intermediates that lead to DNA damage sensitivity; we show that this negative Srs2 activity requires the C terminus of Srs2. Dissection of the genetic interactions of thesrs2(1-850) allele suggest a role for Srs2’s helicase activity in sister chromatid cohesion. Our results also indicate that Srs2’s function becomes more central in diploid cells.IMPORTANCEHomologous recombination (HR) is a key mechanism that repairs damaged DNA. However, this process has to be tightly regulated; failure to regulate it can lead to genome instability. The Srs2 helicase is considered a regulator of HR; it was shown to be able to evict the recombinase Rad51 from DNA. Cells lacking Srs2 exhibit sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents, and in some cases, they display defects in DNA replication. The relative roles of the helicase and Rad51 removal activities of Srs2 in genome stability remain unclear. To address this question, we created a new Srs2 mutant which has only the DNA helicase domain. Our study shows that only the DNA helicase domain is needed to deal with DNA damage and assist in DNA replication during vegetative growth and in meiosis. Thus, our findings shift the view on the role of Srs2 in the maintenance of genome integrity.

scholarly journals akirin is required for diakinesis bivalent structure and synaptonemal complex disassembly at meiotic prophase I

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 1053-1067 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy M. Clemons ◽  
Heather M. Brockway ◽  
Yizhi Yin ◽  
Bhavatharini Kasinathan ◽  
Yaron S. Butterfield ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Synaptonemal Complex ◽  
Meiotic Prophase ◽  
Chromosome Condensation ◽  
Late Prophase ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Prophase I ◽  
Meiotic Prophase I ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved ◽  
Key Events

During meiosis, evolutionarily conserved mechanisms regulate chromosome remodeling, leading to the formation of a tight bivalent structure. This bivalent, a linked pair of homologous chromosomes, is essential for proper chromosome segregation in meiosis. The formation of a tight bivalent involves chromosome condensation and restructuring around the crossover. The synaptonemal complex (SC), which mediates homologous chromosome association before crossover formation, disassembles concurrently with increased condensation during bivalent remodeling. Both chromosome condensation and SC disassembly are likely critical steps in acquiring functional bivalent structure. The mechanisms controlling SC disassembly, however, remain unclear. Here we identify akir-1 as a gene involved in key events of meiotic prophase I in Caenorhabditis elegans. AKIR-1 is a protein conserved among metazoans that lacks any previously known function in meiosis. We show that akir-1 mutants exhibit severe meiotic defects in late prophase I, including improper disassembly of the SC and aberrant chromosome condensation, independently of the condensin complexes. These late-prophase defects then lead to aberrant reconfiguring of the bivalent. The meiotic divisions are delayed in akir-1 mutants and are accompanied by lagging chromosomes. Our analysis therefore provides evidence for an important role of proper SC disassembly in configuring a functional bivalent structure.

scholarly journals Rad51 and Dmc1 Form Mixed Complexes Associated with Mouse Meiotic Chromosome Cores and Synaptonemal Complexes

1999 ◽  
Vol 147 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madalena Tarsounas ◽  
Takashi Morita ◽  
Ronald E. Pearlman ◽  
Peter B. Moens
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Meiotic Chromosome ◽  
Amino Acid Level ◽  
Distribution Patterns ◽  
Early Prophase ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Prophase I ◽  
Meiotic Chromosomes ◽  
Yeast Meiosis

The eukaryotic RecA homologues RAD51 and DMC1 function in homology recognition and formation of joint-molecule recombination intermediates during yeast meiosis. The precise immunolocalization of these two proteins on the meiotic chromosomes of plants and animals has been complicated by their high degree of identity at the amino acid level. With antibodies that have been immunodepleted of cross-reactive epitopes, we demonstrate that RAD51 and DMC1 have identical distribution patterns in extracts of mouse spermatocytes in successive prophase I stages, suggesting coordinate functionality. Immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopy with these antibodies demonstrate colocalization of the two proteins on the meiotic chromosome cores at early prophase I. We also show that mouse RAD51 and DMC1 establish protein–protein interactions with each other and with the chromosome core component COR1(SCP3) in a two-hybrid system and in vitro binding analyses. These results suggest that the formation of a multiprotein recombination complex associated with the meiotic chromosome cores is essential for the development and fulfillment of the meiotic recombination process.

scholarly journals HIM-17 regulates the position of recombination events and GSP-1/2 localization to establish short arm identity on bivalents in meiosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (17) ◽  
pp. e2016363118
Author(s):  
Saravanapriah Nadarajan ◽  
Elisabeth Altendorfer ◽  
Takamune T. Saito ◽  
Marina Martinez-Garcia ◽  
Monica P. Colaiácovo
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Normal Chromosome ◽  
Early Prophase ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Late Prophase ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Meiotic Progression ◽  
Prophase I ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Normal Expression

The position of recombination events established along chromosomes in early prophase I and the chromosome remodeling that takes place in late prophase I are intrinsically linked steps of meiosis that need to be tightly regulated to ensure accurate chromosome segregation and haploid gamete formation. Here, we show that RAD-51 foci, which form at the sites of programmed meiotic DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), exhibit a biased distribution toward off-centered positions along the chromosomes in wild-type Caenorhabditis elegans, and we identify two meiotic roles for chromatin-associated protein HIM-17 that ensure normal chromosome remodeling in late prophase I. During early prophase I, HIM-17 regulates the distribution of DSB-dependent RAD-51 foci and crossovers on chromosomes, which is critical for the formation of distinct chromosome subdomains (short and long arms of the bivalents) later during chromosome remodeling. During late prophase I, HIM-17 promotes the normal expression and localization of protein phosphatases GSP-1/2 to the surface of the bivalent chromosomes and may promote GSP-1 phosphorylation, thereby antagonizing Aurora B kinase AIR-2 loading on the long arms and preventing premature loss of sister chromatid cohesion. We propose that HIM-17 plays distinct roles at different stages during meiotic progression that converge to promote normal chromosome remodeling and accurate chromosome segregation.

scholarly journals Sister chromatid repair maintains genomic integrity during meiosis in Caenorhabditis elegans

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Toraason ◽  
Cordell Clark ◽  
Anna Horacek ◽  
Marissa L. Glover ◽  
Alina Salagean ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Meiotic Prophase ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Early Prophase ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Late Prophase ◽  
Exogenous Dna ◽  
Prophase I ◽  
Meiotic Prophase I

SummaryDuring meiosis, the maintenance of genome integrity is critical for generating viable haploid gametes [1]. In meiotic prophase I, double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) are induced and a subset of these DSBs are repaired as interhomolog crossovers to ensure proper chromosome segregation. DSBs in excess of the permitted number of crossovers must be repaired by other pathways to ensure genome integrity [2]. To determine if the sister chromatid is engaged for meiotic DSB repair during oogenesis, we developed an assay to detect sister chromatid repair events at a defined DSB site during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis. Using this assay, we directly demonstrate that the sister chromatid is available as a meiotic repair template for both crossover and noncrossover recombination, with noncrossovers being the predominant recombination outcome. We additionally find that the sister chromatid is the exclusive recombination partner for DSBs during late meiotic prophase I. Analysis of noncrossover conversion tract sequences reveals that DSBs are processed similarly throughout prophase I and recombination intermediates remain central around the DSB site. Further, we demonstrate that the SMC-5/6 complex is required for long conversion tracts in early prophase I and intersister crossovers during late meiotic prophase I; whereas, the XPF-1 nuclease is required only in late prophase to promote sister chromatid repair. In response to exogenous DNA damage at different stages of meiosis, we find that mutants for SMC-5/6 and XPF-1 have differential effects on progeny viability. Overall, we propose that SMC-5/6 both processes recombination intermediates and promotes sister chromatid repair within meiotic prophase I, while XPF-1 is required as an intersister resolvase only in late prophase I.

scholarly journals Meiotic S-Phase Damage Activates Recombination without Checkpoint Arrest

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 1651-1660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel G. Pankratz ◽  
Susan L. Forsburg
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Meiotic Division ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Response ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Yeast Meiosis

Checkpoints operate during meiosis to ensure the completion of DNA synthesis and programmed recombination before the initiation of meiotic divisions. Studies in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe suggest that the meiotic response to DNA damage due to a failed replication checkpoint response differs substantially from the vegetative response, and may be influenced by the presence of homologous chromosomes. The checkpoint responses to DNA damage during fission yeast meiosis are not well characterized. Here we report that DNA damage induced during meiotic S-phase does not activate checkpoint arrest. We also find that in wild-type cells, markers for DNA breaks can persist at least to the first meiotic division. We also observe increased spontaneous S-phase damage in checkpoint mutants, which is repaired by recombination without activating checkpoint arrest. Our results suggest that fission yeast meiosis is exceptionally tolerant of DNA damage, and that some forms of spontaneous S-phase damage can be repaired by recombination without activating checkpoint arrest.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document