scholarly journals Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer in middle–low-volume centers in Western countries: a propensity score matching analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 405 (6) ◽  
pp. 797-807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Maria Garbarino ◽  
Gianluca Costa ◽  
Giovanni Guglielmo Laracca ◽  
Giorgio Castagnola ◽  
Paolo Mercantini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Distal Gastrectomy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Open Distal Gastrectomy ◽  
Propensity Score Matching Analysis ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Low Volume

scholarly journals Oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic and open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: A propensity score matching analysis.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 135-135
Author(s):  
Yoona Chung ◽  
Sung Il Choi ◽  
Kyungpyo Hong ◽  
Sanghyun Kim
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Distal Gastrectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy ◽  
Oncologic Outcomes ◽  
Open Distal Gastrectomy ◽  
Propensity Score Matching Analysis

135 Background: The aim of this study is to investigate the oncologic outcomes as well as short-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer using propensity-score matching analysis. Methods: A total of 384 patients underwent distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer from July 2006 to November 2016. Data on short- and long-term outcomes were collected prospectively and reviewed. Propensity-score matching was applied at a ratio of 1:1 comparing the laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) group and open distal gastrectomy (ODG) groups. Results: The LDG group showed longer operative time than the ODG group. However, resumption of diet and length of hospital stay were shorter in the LDG group than in the ODG group (4.7 vs. 5.6 days, p= 0.049 and 9.6 vs. 11.5 days, p= 0.035, respectively).The extent of lymph node dissection in the LDG group was more limited than in the ODG group ( p= 0.002), although there was no difference in the number of retrieved lymph nodes between the two groups. The 3-year overall survival rates were 98% and 86.9% ( p= 0.018), whereas the 3-year recurrence-free survival were 86.3% and 75.3%, p= 0.259) in the LDG and the ODG groups. Conclusions: Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is safe and feasible for advanced gastric cancer in terms of earlier recovery after surgery and long-term oncologic outcomes.

scholarly journals The Effect of Neoadjuvant Therapies for Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 379-386
Author(s):  
Tongbo Wang ◽  
Yingtai Chen ◽  
Lulu Zhao ◽  
Hong Zhou ◽  
Chaorui Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a case–control study

2011 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Scatizzi ◽  
Katrin C. Kröning ◽  
Elisa Lenzi ◽  
Luca Moraldi ◽  
Stefano Cantafio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Case Control Study ◽  
Distal Gastrectomy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Open Distal Gastrectomy ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Control Study
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document