Immune checkpoint blockade for Merkel cell carcinoma: actual findings and unanswered questions

2019 ◽  
Vol 145 (2) ◽  
pp. 429-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Gallo ◽  
◽  
Valentina Guarnotta ◽  
Federica De Cicco ◽  
Manila Rubino ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21064-e21064
Author(s):  
Evan Rosenbaum ◽  
Ciara Marie Kelly ◽  
Christopher Andrew Barker ◽  
Travis Adamson ◽  
Hannah Kiesler ◽  
...  

e21064 Background: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an immunogenic neuroendocrine malignancy with promising responses to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). Although ICB is standard of care in advanced MCC patients, approximately 50% of patients are resistant to ICB. Thus, it is crucial to identify biomarkers predictive of response. Methods: To understand the genomic landscape of MCC, we performed exome capture sequencing on 27 tumor and matched normal samples from 25 patients with MCC treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering. Herein, we report the analysis of 16 paired samples from 14 patients. Nonsynonymous, high-confidence somatic mutations were identified and tumor reads aligned to the Merkel cell polyoma virus (MCPyV) were quantified. Results: Tumor and matched normal samples were sequenced to a median target coverage depth of 53x and 79x reads, respectively. One sample was not analyzed due to inadequate coverage. The MCPyV genome was detected in 12 of 13 patients (92%). The median somatic mutation burden among analyzed samples was 19 nonsynonymous variants per exome (range: 8 - 120). No recurrent driver mutations were identified in any sample. Four samples lacked potential driver mutations and, among the remaining 11 samples, 36 putatively oncogenic mutations were detected in 33 genes (variant allele frequency: 0.08 – 1), including genes involved in the cell cycle checkpoint ( TP53, RB1), DNA damage repair ( ERCC4, FANCA, FANCD2), PI3K-AKT-mTOR ( PIK3CA, PIK3CG), and Notch ( NOTCH1, NOTCH2) pathways. One sample with undetected MCPyV DNA demonstrated loss of heterozygosity of both TP53 and RB1. Four samples contained strand coordinated clusters of mutations in more than 20 distinct gene regions, suggesting an APOBEC-high mutagenesis signature. Conclusions: The MCPyV genome was detected in most tumors analyzed and tumor mutation burden was low in such tumors, consistent with published literature. Analysis of an additional 11 sample pairs is ongoing, along with personalized neoantigen binding predictions on all samples. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for PDL1 and CD8 expression is in progress. Associations between the aforementioned and response to ICB will be reported.


Molecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 1392
Author(s):  
Hong Yuan ◽  
Jing Liu ◽  
Jun Zhang

In addition to surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy, immunotherapy has emerged as a standard pillar of cancer treatment. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as targeting programmed death-1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) have been integrated into standard-of-care regimens for patients with advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), who were previously limited by the lack of treatment options. Atezolizumab, durvalumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab are all currently used as part of standard-of-care treatment for different stages of lung cancer. Recent successes and failures of immune checkpoint blockade-based combination therapies have provided significant insights into implementing combination strategies in LUSC. Therefore, there is an urgent need to correctly select patients who are more likely to respond to immunotherapy and understand the mechanisms of primary or acquired resistance. In this review, we aim at summarizing the emerging clinical data on the promise and challenge of ICIs, discussing the unmet need of potential biomarkers for predicting response or resistance to immunotherapy, and providing an overview of the current immune landscape and future directions in advanced LUSC.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
pp. e1338237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk Schadendorf ◽  
Paul Nghiem ◽  
Shailender Bhatia ◽  
Axel Hauschild ◽  
Philippe Saiag ◽  
...  

Aging ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (19) ◽  
pp. 19316-19324
Author(s):  
Pengju Li ◽  
Jeifei Xiao ◽  
Bangfen Zhou ◽  
Jinhuan Wei ◽  
Junhang Luo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Giuseppina Gallucci ◽  
Anna Maria Bochicchio ◽  
Giuseppina Gallucci ◽  
Luigi Cagiano ◽  
Michele Grieco ◽  
...  

Background: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare skin neoplasm first described by Toker in 1972. The tumor usually presents in the sixth to seventh decade of life as a solitary reddish-brown to violaceous subcutaneous nodule on the head, neck, or the extremities. It is seen at an earlier age only in immunocompromised patients like transplant patients in immunosuppressive therapy. Thus, cancer has now become the second cause of death among transplant patients. The tumor growth is rapid in MCC patients, and for metastatic disease, no substantial benefit is obtained by chemotherapy. A new drug has recently become available, an immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI), avelumab, that is able to delay disease progression significantly. However, there are no current guidelines for the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in transplant patients. Case Presentation: We describe the case of a 55-year-old kidney transplant patient on immunosuppressive therapy with tacrolimus with an early occurrence of a Merkel cell carcinoma whose aggressive behaviour could not be hampered by Avelumab, due to fear of allograft rejection. Conclusion: CPI therapy is potentially lifesaving in advanced MCC. Further studies are urgently needed to test its benefit in this rapidly expanding field of post-transplant malignancies where there are only a few and less effective therapeutic options.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. e1315496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Galluzzi ◽  
Guido Kroemer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document