scholarly journals Primary systemic therapy for patients with brain metastases from lung cancer ineligible for targeted agents

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carsten Nieder ◽  
Siv G. Aanes ◽  
Ellinor Haukland
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Targeted Agents ◽  
Primary Systemic Therapy ◽  
Intention To Treat

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate overall survival after systemic therapy, largely chemotherapy, in patients with small cell or non-small cell lung cancer and brain metastases. After completion of systemic therapy, some patients received planned brain irradiation, while others were followed. Methods Retrospective cohort study. Results Thirty-eight patients were included (28 small cell, 20 followed with imaging). Six of these 20 patients (30%) received delayed radiotherapy during follow-up. Planned radiotherapy (n = 18, intention-to-treat) was associated with longer survival from diagnosis of brain metastases, median 10.8 versus 6.1 months, p = 0.025. Delayed radiotherapy still resulted in numerically better survival than no radiotherapy at all (median 8.8 versus 5.3 months, not significant). If calculated from the start of delayed radiotherapy, median survival was only 2.7 months. In a multivariable analysis, both Karnofsky performance status ≥ 70 (p = 0.03) and planned radiotherapy (p = 0.05) were associated with better survival. Conclusion In patients ineligible for targeted agents, planned radiotherapy in a modern treatment setting was associated with longer survival compared to no radiotherapy. Timing and type of radiotherapy in such patients should be evaluated in prospective trials to identify patients who might not need planned radiotherapy.

Treatment for Brain Metastases: ASCO-SNO-ASTRO Guideline

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A Vogelbaum ◽  
Paul D Brown ◽  
Hans Messersmith ◽  
Priscilla K Brastianos ◽  
Stuart Burri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Local Therapy ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Whole Brain Radiation ◽  
Brain Radiation

Abstract Purpose To provide guidance to clinicians regarding therapy for patients with brain metastases from solid tumors. Methods ASCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature. Results Thirty-two randomized trials published in 2008 or later met eligibility criteria and form the primary evidentiary base. Recommendations Surgery is a reasonable option for patients with brain metastases. Patients with large tumors with mass effect are more likely to benefit than those with multiple brain metastases and/or uncontrolled systemic disease. Patients with symptomatic brain metastases should receive local therapy regardless of the systemic therapy used. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases, local therapy should not be deferred unless deferral is specifically recommended in this guideline. The decision to defer local therapy should be based on a multidisciplinary discussion of the potential benefits and harms that the patient may experience. Several regimens were recommended for non–small-cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases and no systemic therapy options, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone should be offered to patients with one to four unresected brain metastases, excluding small-cell lung carcinoma. SRS alone to the surgical cavity should be offered to patients with one to two resected brain metastases. SRS, whole brain radiation therapy, or their combination are reasonable options for other patients. Memantine and hippocampal avoidance should be offered to patients who receive whole brain radiation therapy and have no hippocampal lesions and 4 months or more expected survival. Patients with asymptomatic brain metastases with either Karnofsky Performance Status ≤ 50 or Karnofsky Performance Status < 70 with no systemic therapy options do not derive benefit from radiation therapy. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/neurooncology-guidelines.

scholarly journals Treatment for Brain Metastases: ASCO-SNO-ASTRO Guideline

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Vogelbaum ◽  
Paul D. Brown ◽  
Hans Messersmith ◽  
Priscilla K. Brastianos ◽  
Stuart Burri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Local Therapy ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Whole Brain Radiation ◽  
Brain Radiation

PURPOSE To provide guidance to clinicians regarding therapy for patients with brain metastases from solid tumors. METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature. RESULTS Thirty-two randomized trials published in 2008 or later met eligibility criteria and form the primary evidentiary base. RECOMMENDATIONS Surgery is a reasonable option for patients with brain metastases. Patients with large tumors with mass effect are more likely to benefit than those with multiple brain metastases and/or uncontrolled systemic disease. Patients with symptomatic brain metastases should receive local therapy regardless of the systemic therapy used. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases, local therapy should not be deferred unless deferral is specifically recommended in this guideline. The decision to defer local therapy should be based on a multidisciplinary discussion of the potential benefits and harms that the patient may experience. Several regimens were recommended for non–small-cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases and no systemic therapy options, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone should be offered to patients with one to four unresected brain metastases, excluding small-cell lung carcinoma. SRS alone to the surgical cavity should be offered to patients with one to two resected brain metastases. SRS, whole brain radiation therapy, or their combination are reasonable options for other patients. Memantine and hippocampal avoidance should be offered to patients who receive whole brain radiation therapy and have no hippocampal lesions and 4 months or more expected survival. Patients with asymptomatic brain metastases with either Karnofsky Performance Status ≤ 50 or Karnofsky Performance Status < 70 with no systemic therapy options do not derive benefit from radiation therapy. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/neurooncology-guidelines .

Antibiotic use reduces efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with advanced melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3100-3100
Author(s):  
Nadina Tinsley ◽  
Natalie Cook ◽  
Cong Zhou ◽  
Sharon Hyo-Eun Nahm ◽  
Samuel Rack ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung

3100 Background: Antibiotic (ABX) use and disruption of the gut microbiome has been demonstrated to reduce the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapeutics in cancer patients. Little is known about the impact of ABX use in patients treated with targeted therapies, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Methods: Retrospective data analysis was performed on advanced melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with TKIs between January 2015 and April 2017 at The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, UK. Demographics, prior systemic treatment, extent of disease, lactate dehydrogenase level (LDH), presence of brain metastases, performance status, comorbidities, TKI agent and the use of ABX (class, route, duration) were collected. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the ABX+ group (defined as patients treated with ABX within 2 weeks of TKI initiation or 6 weeks after) and the ABX – group (patients with no ABX during specified period). Statistical analyses were performed with univariate and multivariable models. Results: In total, 168 patients were included; 89 patients (53%) with advanced NSCLC and 79 patients (47%) with melanoma. Over a third of patients, (57/168, 34%) received ABX in the specified period (ABX+). On univariable analysis, ABX use was associated with shorter PFS (208 days vs 357 days, p = 0.008) and OS (294 days vs 438 days, p = 0.024). Increased age, poorer performance status, and higher LDH were also associated with shorter PFS and OS. On multivariable analysis, ABX use was independently associated with shorter PFS (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.05-2.34, p = 0.028) and OS (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.44-3.32, p = 0.0002). The negative impact of ABX on OS was particularly pronounced for patients with worse performance status (HR 3.82, 95% CI 1.18-12.36, p = 0.025). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the largest multivariable analysis showing ABX use independently reduces PFS and OS in patients treated with TKIs. It is the first analysis to demonstrate this phenomenon across two distinct tumour sites. The data suggests that ABX use could be an independent predictor of shorter PFS and OS in cancer patients treated with TKIs, and warrants further validation in a larger cohort.

The incidence and predictors of new brain metastases in patients with non–small cell lung cancer following discontinuation of systemic therapy

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Dennis London ◽  
Dev N. Patel ◽  
Bernadine Donahue ◽  
Ralph E. Navarro ◽  
Jason Gurewitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Recurrent Events ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung

OBJECTIVE Patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) metastatic to the brain are living longer. The risk of new brain metastases when these patients stop systemic therapy is unknown. The authors hypothesized that the risk of new brain metastases remains constant for as long as patients are off systemic therapy. METHODS A prospectively collected registry of patients undergoing radiosurgery for brain metastases was analyzed. Of 606 patients with NSCLC, 63 met the inclusion criteria of discontinuing systemic therapy for at least 90 days and undergoing active surveillance. The risk factors for the development of new tumors were determined using Cox proportional hazards and recurrent events models. RESULTS The median duration to new brain metastases off systemic therapy was 16.0 months. The probability of developing an additional new tumor at 6, 12, and 18 months was 26%, 40%, and 53%, respectively. There were no additional new tumors 22 months after stopping therapy. Patients who discontinued therapy due to intolerance or progression of the disease and those with mutations in RAS or receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) pathways (e.g., KRAS, EGFR) were more likely to develop new tumors (hazard ratio [HR] 2.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33–3.81, p = 2.5 × 10−3; HR 2.51, 95% CI 1.45–4.34, p = 9.8 × 10−4, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The rate of new brain metastases from NSCLC in patients off systemic therapy decreases over time and is uncommon 2 years after cessation of cancer therapy. Patients who stop therapy due to toxicity or who have RAS or RTK pathway mutations have a higher rate of new metastases and should be followed more closely.

scholarly journals Outcomes to first-line pembrolizumab in patients with PD-L1-high (≥50%) non–small cell lung cancer and a poor performance status

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e001007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joao V Alessi ◽  
Biagio Ricciuti ◽  
Elizabeth Jiménez-Aguilar ◽  
Fangxin Hong ◽  
Zihan Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Ps

BackgroundPatients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) have been excluded from phase III immunotherapy clinical trials. We sought to evaluate clinical outcomes to first-line pembrolizumab in patients with advanced NSCLC, a PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of ≥50%, and an ECOG PS of 2.MethodsWe performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic NSCLC and a PD-L1 TPS of ≥50% (negative for genomic alterations in EGFR and ALK) who received treatment with first-line pembrolizumab. Clinical outcomes were compared in patients based on ECOG PS.ResultsAmong the 234 patients, 83.3% (n=195) had an ECOG PS of 0 or 1, and 16.7% (n=39) had an ECOG PS of 2. The baseline clinicopathological characteristics were balanced between the ECOG PS 0–1 vs 2 groups in terms of age, sex, tobacco use, histology, KRAS mutation status, presence of other potentially targetable driver mutations (BRAF, MET, HER2, RET), presence of brain metastases, and PD-L1 TPS distribution. Compared with patients with an ECOG PS of 0 or 1, patients with an ECOG PS of 2 had a significantly lower objective response rate (43.1% vs 25.6%; p=0.04), a numerically shorter median progression-free survival (6.6 months vs 4.0 months; HR 0.70 (95% CI 0.47 to 1.06); p=0.09), and a significantly shorter median overall survival (20.3 months vs 7.4 months; HR 0.42 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.68); p<0.001). On disease progression, patients with an ECOG PS of 2 were significantly less likely to receive second-line systemic therapy compared with patients with an ECOG PS of 0–1 (65% vs 22.2%, p=0.001).ConclusionsA subset of patients with NSCLC and an ECOG PS of 2 can respond to first-line pembrolizumab. However, clinical outcomes in this population are often poor and use of second-line systemic therapy is infrequent.

Do gender and race influence survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases? An outcomes study utilizing the RTOG RPA class stratification

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7153-7153
Author(s):  
G. M. Videtic ◽  
C. A. Reddy ◽  
S. T. Chao ◽  
T. W. Rice ◽  
D. J. Adelstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastasis ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Recursive Partitioning ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Class I ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Gender And Race ◽  
Class Stratification

7153 Background: To explore gender, race and their interactions in the setting of NSCLC brain metastases only, a single-institution brain database was analyzed, using the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) brain metastases classification. Methods: From 1/82 to 9/04, 831 NSCLC pts with brain metastases were registered. RPA criteria for analysis were: class I- Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥ 70, age<65 years, primary tumor controlled, no extracranial metastases; class III- KPS<70; class II- all others. Results: Median follow-up was 5.4 months (m) (range 0–122.9). Median age was 62.4 (range 25–90). Median KPS was 80 (range 20–100). There were 485 males [M] (58.4%) and 346 females [F] (41.6%). 824 pts (99%) were either African-American (AA; n = 142[17%]) or White (W; n = 682[83%]). Pts characteristics were balanced when stratified by RPA class and by treatments. Median survival (MS) in months from time of brain metastasis diagnosis for all pts was 5.8. MS in months by gender [F vs. M] and race [W vs. AA] was: 6.3 vs. 5.5, p = 0.013; 6.0 vs. 5.2, p = 0.08, respectively. By RPA class for gender, MS trends (in months) favored F over M in classes I and II but not III: 17.1 vs. 9.5 (p = 0.11); 6.8 vs. 6.0 (p = 0.09), 2.7 vs. 2.5 (p = 0.42), respectively. By RPA class for gender and race, MS trends (in months) favored AAF over AAM in classes I and II but not III: 30.0 vs. 12.4, p = 0.50; 11.2 vs. 4.6, p = 0.021; 3.2 vs. 3.2, p = 0.64, respectively; and WF over WM in classes I but not II or III: 14.4 vs. 9.5, p = 0.11; 6.6 vs. 6.3, p = 0.38; 2.4 vs. 2.3, p = 0.49, respectively. On multivariable analysis, significant variables were gender (p = 0.041; RR 0.83); RPA class (p < 0.0001; RR 0.28, for I vs. III; p < 0.0001; RR 0.51, for II vs. III). Conclusions: Gender significantly influences NSCLC brain metastasis survival while race trends to significance. MS trends by RTOG RPA class suggest race may interact with genderprimarily in class I but pt numbers limited significance. Further characterization of these factors is warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Brain metastases in patients treated with targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 326-326
Author(s):  
H. Alharbi ◽  
T. K. Choueiri ◽  
C. K. Kollmannsberger ◽  
S. North ◽  
M. J. MacKenzie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Local Treatment ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
First Line ◽  
The Brain

326 Background: Patients with brain metastases from advanced RCC treated in the targeted therapy era are not well characterized. Methods: Data from patients with mRCC treated with targeted therapy were collected through the International mRCC Database Consortium from 6 centers. Results: One hundred six out of 705 (15%) patients with mRCC had brain metastases. Forty-seven patients had brain metastases at the start of first-line anti-VEGF therapy and the rest developed metastases during follow-up. Of the patients with brain metastases, 6%, 68%, and 26% were in the favorable, intermediate and poor prognosis groups, respectively, per the Heng et al JCO 2009 criteria. Ninety percent had cerebral metastases, 17% had cerebellar metastases, 40% had a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) <80%, and 81% had symptoms of brain metastases. The median largest size and number of brain metastases was 1.8 cm (range 0.2–6.6) and 1 (range 1–20), respectively. Patients were treated with first-line sunitinib (n=77), sorafenib (n=23), bevacizumab (n=5), and temsirolimus (n=1). Local disease treatment included whole brain radiotherapy (81%), stereotactic radiosurgery (25%), and neurosurgery (25%). The brain metastases of 59 patients were evaluable and based on the local treatment and/or targeted therapy achieved 7 (12%) complete responses, 23 (39%) partial responses, 14 (24%) patients with stable disease, and 15 (25%) patients with progressive disease in the brain metastases. Patients with more than 4 brain metastases vs. those with no more than 4 have an overall survival time from diagnosis of brain metastasis of 3.9 vs. 15.4 months (p=0.0051). Previous nephrectomy, sarcomatoid, and non-clear cell histology are not associated with development of brain metastases. On multivariable analysis, KPS<80% (p=0.0139), diagnosis to treatment with targeted therapy <1 year (p=0.0012), and higher number of brain metastases (p=0.0311) were associated with worse survival from diagnosis of brain metastases. Conclusions: In patients with brain metastases from RCC, KPS at start of therapy, diagnosis to treatment time and number of brain metastases may be prognostic factors for overall survival. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Does the Couse of Astragalus-Containing Chinese Herbal Prescriptions and Radiotherapy Benefit to Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treatment: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hailang He ◽  
Xianmei Zhou ◽  
Qian Wang ◽  
Yang Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
White Blood Cells ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Chinese Herbal

Background.Radiotherapy has been widely used for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), while its low efficacy and high toxicity raise big concerns. Astragalus (as a monarch drug)-containing Chinese herbal prescriptions and radiotherapy were frequently coused for NSCLC in China; however, the effects were not systematically analyzed.Objective.To evaluate the benefits of Astragalus-containing Chinese herbal prescriptions combined with radiotherapy for NSCLC.Methods.The randomized controlled trials involving NSCLC treatment with Astragalus-containing Chinese herbal prescriptions combined with radiotherapy were searched. The Review Manager 5.1 software was employed for data analysis. Funnel plot and Egger’s test were applied to evaluate publication bias.Results.29 eligible studies met our criteria. Of the studies, 8, 6, and 4 reported reduced risk of death at one year, two years, and three years, respectively. 26 studies revealed amended tumor response. Six studies showed improved Karnofsky performance status. Among the studies, 14 and 18 displayed a lowered white blood cells (WBC) toxicity and an ameliorated radiation pneumonia, respectively.Conclusion.Couse of Astragalus-containing Chinese herbal prescriptions and radiotherapy may benefit the patients with NSCLC via increasing the therapeutic effectiveness and reducing the toxicity of radiotherapy. To confirm the exact merits, further rigorously designed trials are warranted.

scholarly journals Reasons for lack of referral to medical oncology for systemic therapy in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: comparison of 2003–2006 with 2010–2011

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 486 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.J. Ko ◽  
R. Tudor ◽  
H. Li ◽  
M. Liu ◽  
K. Skolnik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Medical Oncology ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Nsclc Patients

IntroductionOnly approximately 25% of stage iv non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) patients receive systemic therapy. For such patients, we examined factors affecting referral to a cancer centre (cc) and to medical oncology (mo), and use of systemic therapy.Methods Using the Glans–Look Lung Cancer database, we completed a chart review of stage iv nsclc patients diagnosed in Southern Alberta during 2003–2006 and 2010–2011, comparing median overall survival (mos), referral, and treatment in the two cohorts.Results Of the 922 patients diagnosed in 2003–2006 and the 560 diagnosed in 2010–2011, 94% and 82% respectively were referred to a cc, with 22% and 23% receiving traditional chemotherapy (tctx). Referral to a cc or mo and use of tctx correlated with survival (p < 0.0001): The mos duration was 11.2 months in those receiving tctx and 1.0 months in those not referred to a cc. The overall mos duration was similar in the two cohorts (4.1 months vs. 3.9 months, p = 0.47). Major reasons for lack of referral to mo included poor functional status, rapid decline, and patient wish, which were similar to the reasons for forgoing tctx. In the two cohorts, 87 (9.4%) and 42 (7.5%) patients received epidermal growth factor inhibitors, with a mos duration of 16.2 months. Multivariable analysis showed that male sex [hazard ratio (hr): 1.16; p = 0.008] and pulmonary embolus (hr: 1.2; p = 0.002) correlated with worse survival. In contrast, receipt of chemotherapy (hr: 0.5; p < 0.001) and enrolment in a clinical trial (hr: 0.76; p = 0.049) correlated with better survival.Conclusions Our experience confirms that, over time, uptake of systemic therapy, including tctx and targeted therapy, changed little despite their established efficacy. Most of the factors limiting systemic therapy uptake appear to be non-modifiable at the time of referral. Rapid diagnosis and the availability of well-tolerated drugs for all nsclc patients will likely be the most important factors in increasing systemic therapy uptake in this population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document