Priorities of a “good death” according to cancer patients, their family caregivers, physicians, and the general population: a nationwide survey

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 3479-3488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Ho Yun ◽  
Kyoung-Nam Kim ◽  
Jin-Ah Sim ◽  
EunKyo Kang ◽  
Jihye Lee ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9580-9580
Author(s):  
S. Kim ◽  
J. Lee ◽  
Y. Yun ◽  
S. Kim ◽  
S. Kim ◽  
...  

9580 Background: This study was aimed to investigate the employment status and work-related difficulties among family caregiver of terminal cancer patients compared with the general population. Methods: A survey was administered to 381 family caregivers of terminal cancer patients at 11hospitals and 994 general populations aged more than 18 years. Results: Family caregivers of terminal cancer patients were female (66.7%) and the patient's spouse (50.9%), with mean age of 46.8years (SD, 13.5). 212(56.1%) were working before cancer diagnosis, however, only 133(36.3%) continued working currently. Compared with the general population, 233(63.7%)family caregivers of terminal cancer patients were more likely to be not working (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] =2.39; 95% confidence interval [95%CI] = 1.73 to 3.29).Those who continued working reported more easy fatigability (40.6% vs 22.4%) and reduced working hours (20.3% vs 2.1%) than general population. For those doing housework, caregiving itself (56.4%) were identified to be the most common difficulties, followed by easy fatigability (32.3%). Major reasons for not working were providing care to the terminal cancer patients (24.0%). Older age (aOR=10.37; 95%CI=2.80 to 38.41), female sex (aOR=4.28; 95%CI=2.25 to 8.13), lower household income (aOR=2.19; 95%CI=1.19 to 4.06), bearing medical cost by other than spouse (aOR=2.10; 95%CI=1.05 to 4.19), and low performance status of the patients (aOR=2.00; 95%CI=1.01 to 3.95) were significantly associated with not working. Conclusions: When compared to the general population, family caregivers of terminal cancer patients were at risk job loss from their caregiving burden, and caregiving and easy fatigability were the major work-related difficulties. Our study might help make a strategy to reduce job loss for family caregivers' caregiving burden. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 2799-2807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boyoung Park ◽  
So Young Kim ◽  
Ji-Yeon Shin ◽  
Robert W. Sanson-Fisher ◽  
Dong Wook Shin ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsunori Miyashita ◽  
Sachiko Kawakami ◽  
Daiki Kato ◽  
Hideomi Yamashita ◽  
Hiroshi Igaki ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geok Ling Lee ◽  
Ivan Mun Hong Woo ◽  
Cynthia Goh

AbstractObjective:The aim of this study was to examine the concept of a good death from the perspectives of both the dying person and the family caregiver, as perceived by bereaved family caregivers of advanced cancer patients.Method:The data were gathered from five focus group discussions and one face-to-face qualitative interview conducted over 8 months among 18 bereaved family caregivers recruited from a local hospice. The transcripts of the focus groups and the interview were entered into NVivo Version 8 and were analyzed using the thematic approach.Results:A good death may be understood as having the biopsychosocial and spiritual aspects of life handled well at the end of life. Five major themes were identified. These were preparation for death, family and social relationships, moments at or near death, comfort and physical care, and spiritual well-being. Differences were also noted in what is important at the end of life between the patients and caregivers. Having a quick death with little suffering was perceived to be good by the patient, but the family caregiver wanted to be able to say a final goodbye to the patient. Patients tend to prefer not to die in their children's presence but the children wished to be present for the final moment. In addition, family caregivers reported it was important for them to be able to give the patients permission to die, to feel recognized for the efforts made, and to have had a fulfilling caregiving experience.Significance of results:Whereas there are global attributes of a good death, our findings suggest that patients and family caregivers may define a good death differently. Therefore, there is a need to respect, address, and reconcile the differences, so that all parties may have a good experience at the end of a person's life.


2020 ◽  
pp. 003022282094508
Author(s):  
Eylem Pasli Gurdogan ◽  
Berna Aksoy ◽  
Ezgi Kinici

This study was conducted to examine the importance of the concept of a good death and the contributing factors from the perspectives of family caregivers of advanced cancer patients. This descriptive and cross-sectional study, conducted with 182 family caregivers, were collected using a questionnaire form and the “Good Death Scale”. The number and percentage distribution, multiple linear regression were used evaluation of data. The total score of the Good Death Scale was 62.65 ± 4.60. The factors contributing to the importance of the concept of a good death were determined as the presence of chronic disease; the type of treatment given to the patient; the presence of another family member who was previously diagnosed with cancer; the presence of a family member who has died of cancer and previously caregiving to a terminally ill family member. This study revealed that the concept of a good death is seen as very important.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document