Clevudine-induced viral response, associated with continued reduction of HBsAg titer, was durable after the withdrawal of therapy

2010 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 410-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyo-Suk Lee ◽  
Byung Chul Yoo ◽  
Kwan Sik Lee ◽  
Ju Hyun Kim ◽  
Soon-Ho Um ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Zimmermann ◽  
Dietrich Hueppe ◽  
Stefan Mauss ◽  
Peter Buggisch ◽  
Heike Pfeiffer-Vornkahl ◽  
...  

Background & Aims: Smoking has multiple effects on factors influencing hepatitis C and antiviral therapy, including lipid metabolism, fibrosis, platelet count and adherence aspects. The aim of this analysis was to determine the impact of smoking on hepatitis C virus antiviral therapy. Methods: Data of two cohorts of an observational multicenter study including therapy-naïve patients infected with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV) treated with dual antiviral therapy (n=7,796) with pegylated interferon alpha 2a in combination with ribavirin, or triple antiviral therapy (n=1,122) containing telaprevir or boceprevir, were analysed. Results: In the univariate matched pair analysis of dual antiviral therapy patients (n=584), smoking was significantly associated with lower sustained viral response rates (p=0.026, OR 0.69 CI: 0.50 – 0.96). The effect of smoking on sustained viral response remained significant (p=0.028, OR 0.67 CI: 0.47 – 0.96) in the multivariate analysis when adjusting for all other baseline parameters with a significant association in the univariate analysis, i.e. diabetes, fibrosis, body mass index, transaminases and baseline viral load. Under protease inhibitors the influence of smoking on virological response did not arise. Conclusions: Smoking has a negative impact on antiviral therapy in naïve patients infected with HCV genotype 1 independently of age, gender, history of drug use or alcoholic liver disease. The effects of smoking might be overcome by the new antiviral agents.Abbreviations: APRI: AST to platelet ratio index; DAA: direct antiviral agent; DT: dual antiviral therapy; EoTR: end of treatment response; RVR: rapid virological response; EVR: early virological response; HCV: hepatitis C virus; IFN: interferon alpha; MPA: Matched Pair Analysis; NS: non-smokers; PEG-IFN: pegylated interferon alpha 2a; PI: protease inhibitor; RBV: ribavirin; SAE: serious adverse event; SOC: standard of care; S: smokers; SVR: sustained viral response.    


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Halliday ◽  
A Vazir ◽  
R Owen ◽  
J Gregson ◽  
R Wassall ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction In TRED-HF, 40% of patients with recovered dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) relapsed in the short-term during phased withdrawal of drug therapy. Non-invasive markers of relapse may be used to monitor patients who wish a trial of therapy withdrawal and provide insights into the pathophysiological drivers of relapse. Purpose To investigate the relationship between changes in heart rate (HR) and relapse amongst patients with recovered DCM undergoing therapy withdrawal in TRED-HF. Methods Patients with recovered DCM were randomised to phased withdrawal of therapy or to continue therapy for 6 months. After 6 months of continued therapy, those in the control arm underwent withdrawal of therapy in a single arm crossover phase. HR was measured at each study visit. Mean HR and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated at baseline, 45 days after baseline, 45 days prior to the end of the study or relapse and at the end of the study or relapse. Patients were stratified by treatment arm and the occurrence of the primary relapse end-point. Heart rate at follow-up was compared amongst patients who had therapy withdrawn and relapsed versus those who had therapy withdrawn and did not. ANCOVA was used to adjust for differences in HR at baseline between the two groups. Results Of 51 patients randomised, 26 were assigned to continue therapy and 25 to withdraw therapy. In the randomised and cross-over phases, 20 patients met the primary relapse end-point; one patient withdrew from the study and one patient completed follow-up in the control arm but did not enter the cross-over phase. Mean HR (standard deviation) at baseline and follow-up for (i) patients in the control arm was 69.9 (9.8) & 65.9 (9.1) respectively; (ii) for those who had therapy withdrawn and did not relapse was 64.6 (10.7) & 74.7 (10.4) respectively; and (iii) for those who had therapy withdrawn and relapsed was 68.3 (11.3) & 86.1 (11.8) respectively [all beats per minute]. The mean change in HR between the penultimate visit and the final visit for those who had therapy withdrawn and did not relapse was −2.4 (9.7) compared to 3.1 (15.5) for those who relapsed. After adjusting for differences in HR at baseline, the mean difference in HR measured at follow-up between patients who underwent therapy withdrawal and did, and did not relapse was 10.4bpm (95% CI 4.0–16.8; p=0.002) (Figure 1 & Table 1). Conclusion(s) A larger increase in HR may be a simple and effective marker of relapse for patients with recovered DCM who have insisted on a trial of therapy withdrawal. Whether HR control is crucial to the maintenance of remission amongst patients with improved cardiac function, or is simply a marker of deteriorating cardiac function, warrants further investigation. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): British Heart Foundation


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S561-S562
Author(s):  
Jehan F Chowdhury ◽  
Anna Winston ◽  
Tanya Zeina ◽  
Hong Gi Shim ◽  
Tine Vindenes

Abstract Background Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a leading cause of advanced liver disease and death. In the United States about 3.5 million people are living with HCV, but only 50% are aware of the infection, 16% are prescribed treatment, and only 9% achieve sustained viral response. The World Health Organization published an HCV elimination goal for 2030 that strives to achieve a 65% reduction in HCV-related deaths and 90% reduction in transmission. An important step toward this goal is micro-elimination at local hospitals by addressing care gaps in the HCV care cascade. Figure 1 Methods We created a retrospective cohort of patients who tested positive for HCV antibody (HCV Ab+) between 2016 and 2018 at Tufts Medical Center in Boston, Massachusetts. We assessed achievement of care cascade steps including HCV viral load (VL) testing, linkage to care, treatment initiation, and sustained viral response (SVR). We also assessed patient demographics, clinical factors and HCV risk factors. We used STATA/IC 14.1 to conduct bivariate analysis to identify factors associated with loss to follow-up across each care cascade step. Results A total of 24,308 HCV antibody tests were done during this timeframe, of which 5% (n=1,222) were HCV Ab+. After excluding duplicate tests, 1,041 unique patients with HCV Ab+ were included. This cohort had a mean age of 47 years and were 61% male, 66% white, 72% on public insurance, 12% HIV-positive, 13% HCV treatment-experienced. The most frequent HCV risk factor was injection drug use, occurring in 64% of patients. Of patients with HCV Ab+, 76% (n=791) were tested for an HCV VL, of which 50% (n=393) had detectable VL and 50% (n=398) had undetectable VL. Of the patients with a detectable VL, 58% (n=226) were linked with care. Following care linkage, 69% (n=155) initiated treatment, of which 90% (n=139) completed treatment, of which 97% (n=135) achieved SVR (Figure 1). Factors that were significantly associated with getting a VL test and linking to care included private insurance, HIV co-infection, absence of intravenous drug use and cirrhosis; however, these factors were not significantly associated with achieving subsequent steps. Conclusion Assessment of the HCV care cascade at our hospital allowed us to identify clear care gaps and areas needing improvement towards a local micro-elimination. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 280-288.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit G. Singal ◽  
Michael L. Volk ◽  
Donald Jensen ◽  
Adrian M. Di Bisceglie ◽  
Philip S. Schoenfeld

2001 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 790-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia L. Yager ◽  
Tara L. Connelly ◽  
Behzad Mortazavi ◽  
K. Eric Wommack ◽  
Nasreen Bano ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document