Upper mixed layer temperature anomalies at the North Atlantic storm-track zone

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 1015-1026 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. N. Moshonkin ◽  
N. A. Diansky
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Time Scales ◽  
Mixed Layer ◽  
Surface Heat Flux ◽  
Surface Heat ◽  
Heat Advection ◽  
Temperature Anomalies ◽  
Mixed Layer Temperature ◽  
Frequency Functions ◽  
Good Agreement

Abstract. Synoptic sea surface temperature anomalies (SSTAs) were determined as a result of separation of time scales smaller than 183 days. The SSTAs were investigated using daily data of ocean weather station "C" (52.75°N; 35.5°W) from 1 January 1976 to 31 December 1980 (1827 days). There were 47 positive and 50 negative significant SSTAs (lifetime longer than 3 days, absolute value greater than 0.10 °C) with four main intervals of the lifetime repetitions: 1. 4–7 days (45% of all cases), 2. 9–13 days (20–25%), 3. 14–18 days (10–15%), and 4. 21–30 days (10–15%) and with a magnitude 1.5–2.0 °C. An upper layer balance model based on equations for temperature, salinity, mechanical energy (with advanced parametrization), state (density), and drift currents was used to simulate SSTA. The original method of modelling taking into account the mean observed temperature profiles proved to be very stable. The model SSTAs are in a good agreement with the observed amplitudes and phases of synoptic SSTAs during all 5 years. Surface heat flux anomalies are the main source of SSTAs. The influence of anomalous drift heat advection is about 30–50% of the SSTA, and the influence of salinity anomalies is about 10–25% and less. The influence of a large-scale ocean front was isolated only once in February-April 1978 during all 5 years. Synoptic SSTAs develop just in the upper half of the homogeneous layer at each winter. We suggest that there are two main causes of such active sublayer formation: 1. surface heat flux in the warm sectors of cyclones and 2. predominant heat transport by ocean currents from the south. All frequency functions of the ocean temperature synoptic response to heat and momentum surface fluxes are of integral character (red noise), though there is strong resonance with 20-days period of wind-driven horizontal heat advection with mixed layer temperature; there are some other peculiarities on the time scales from 5.5 to 13 days. Observed and modelled frequency functions seem to be in good agreement.

scholarly journals On the Effect of Surface Heat-Flux Heterogeneities on the Mixed-Layer-Top Entrainment

2014 ◽  
Vol 151 (3) ◽  
pp. 531-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Sühring ◽  
Björn Maronga ◽  
Florian Herbort ◽  
Siegfried Raasch
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Mixed Layer ◽  
Surface Heat Flux ◽  
Surface Heat ◽  
Effect Of Surface

scholarly journals Dryline Bulge Evolution in a Two-Dimensional Mixed-Layer Model

2004 ◽  
Vol 61 (21) ◽  
pp. 2528-2543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn M. Auslander ◽  
Peter R. Bannon
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Mixed Layer ◽  
Surface Heat Flux ◽  
Mixed Layer Depth ◽  
Surface Heat ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Layer Model ◽  
Layer Depth ◽  
Inversion Strength ◽  
Mixed Layer Model

Abstract This study examines the diurnal response of a mixed-layer model of the dryline system to localized anomalies of surface heat flux, topography, mixed-layer depth, and inversion strength. The two-dimensional, mixed-layer model is used to simulate the dynamics of a cool, moist layer east of the dryline capped by an inversion under synoptically quiescent conditions. The modeled domain simulates the sloping topography of the U.S. Great Plains. The importance of this study can be related to dryline bulges that are areas with enhanced convergence that may trigger convection in suitable environmental conditions. All anomalies are represented by a Gaussian function in the horizontal whose amplitude, size, and orientation can be altered. A positive, surface-heat-flux anomaly produces increased mixing that creates a bulge toward the east, while a negative anomaly produces a westward bulge. Anomalies in topography show a similar trend in bulge direction with a peak giving an eastward bulge, and a valley giving a westward bulge. Anomalies in the initial mixed-layer depth yield an eastward bulge in the presence of a minimum and a westward bulge for a maximum. An anomaly in the initial inversion strength results in a westward bulge when the inversion is stronger, and an eastward bulge when the inversion is weak. The bulges observed in this study at 1800 LT ranged from 400 to 600 km along the dryline and from 25 to 80 km across the dryline. When the heating ceases at night, the entrainment and eastward movement of the line stops, and the line surges westward. This westward surge at night has little dependence on the type of anomaly applied. Whether a westward or eastward bulge was present at 1800 LT, the surge travels an equal distance toward the west. However, the inclusion of weak nocturnal friction reduces the westward surge by 100 to 200 km due to mechanical mixing of the very shallow leading edge of the surge. All model runs exhibit peaks in the mixed-layer depth along the dryline at 1800 LT caused by enhanced boundary layer convergence and entrainment of elevated mixed-layer air into the mixed layer. These peaks appear along the section of the dryline that is least parallel to the southerly flow. They vary in amplitude from 4 to 9 km depending on the amplitude of the anomaly. However, the surface-heat-flux anomalies generally result in peaks at the higher end of this interval. It is hypothesized that the formation of these peaks may be the trigger for deep convection along the dryline in the late afternoon.

scholarly journals Seasonality of Decadal Sea Surface Temperature Anomalies in the Northwestern Pacific

2006 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 2953-2968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Mochizuki ◽  
Hideji Kida
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Sea Surface Temperature ◽  
Mixed Layer ◽  
Surface Heat Flux ◽  
Heat Budget ◽  
Surface Heat ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
Northwestern Pacific ◽  
Sst Anomaly

Abstract The seasonality of the decadal sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies and the related physical processes in the northwestern Pacific were investigated using a three-dimensional bulk mixed layer model. In the Kuroshio–Oyashio Extension (KOE) region, the strongest decadal SST anomaly was observed during December–February, while that of the central North Pacific occurred during February–April. From an examination of the seasonal heat budget of the ocean mixed layer, it was revealed that the seasonal-scale enhancement of the decadal SST anomaly in the KOE region was controlled by horizontal Ekman temperature transport in early winter and by vertical entrainment in autumn. The temperature transport by the geostrophic current made only a slight contribution to the seasonal variation of the decadal SST anomaly, despite controlling the upper-ocean thermal conditions on decadal time scales through the slow Rossby wave adjustment to the wind stress curl. When averaging over the entire KOE region, the contribution from the net sea surface heat flux was also no longer significantly detected. By examining the horizontal distributions of the local thermal damping rate, however, it was concluded that the wintertime decadal SST anomaly in the eastern KOE region was rather damped by the net sea surface heat flux. It was due to the fact that the anomalous local thermal damping of the SST anomaly resulting from the vertical entrainment in autumn was considerably strong enough to suppress the anomalous local atmospheric thermal forcing that acted to enhance the decadal SST anomaly.

Atmospheric and Oceanic Contributions to Irreducible Forecast Uncertainty of Arctic Surface Climate

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 331-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffen Tietsche ◽  
Ed Hawkins ◽  
Jonathan J. Day
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Time Scales ◽  
Surface Heat Flux ◽  
Surface Heat ◽  
Initial State ◽  
Forecast Uncertainty ◽  
Surface Climate ◽  
Oceanic Heat Flux ◽  
Arctic Surface

Abstract Uncertainty of Arctic seasonal to interannual predictions arising from model errors and initial state uncertainty has been widely discussed in the literature, whereas the irreducible forecast uncertainty (IFU) arising from the chaoticity of the climate system has received less attention. However, IFU provides important insights into the mechanisms through which predictability is lost and hence can inform prioritization of model development and observations deployment. Here, the authors characterize how internal oceanic and surface atmospheric heat fluxes contribute to the IFU of Arctic sea ice and upper-ocean heat content in an Earth system model by analyzing a set of idealized ensemble prediction experiments. It is found that atmospheric and oceanic heat flux are often equally important for driving unpredictable Arctic-wide changes in sea ice and surface water temperatures and hence contribute equally to IFU. Atmospheric surface heat flux tends to dominate Arctic-wide changes for lead times of up to a year, whereas oceanic heat flux tends to dominate regionally and on interannual time scales. There is in general a strong negative covariance between surface heat flux and ocean vertical heat flux at depth, and anomalies of lateral ocean heat transport are wind driven, which suggests that the unpredictable oceanic heat flux variability is mainly forced by the atmosphere. These results are qualitatively robust across different initial states, but substantial variations in the amplitude of IFU exist. It is concluded that both atmospheric variability and the initial state of the upper ocean are key ingredients for predictions of Arctic surface climate on seasonal to interannual time scales.

Frontolysis by surface heat flux in the eastern Japan Sea: importance of mixed layer depth

2019 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 283-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shun Ohishi ◽  
Hidenori Aiki ◽  
Tomoki Tozuka ◽  
Meghan F. Cronin
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Mixed Layer ◽  
Surface Heat Flux ◽  
Mixed Layer Depth ◽  
Japan Sea ◽  
Surface Heat ◽  
Layer Depth ◽  
Eastern Japan

Genesis of Indian Ocean Mixed Layer Temperature Anomalies: A Heat Budget Analysis

2010 ◽  
Vol 23 (20) ◽  
pp. 5375-5403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agus Santoso ◽  
Alexander Sen Gupta ◽  
Matthew H. England
Keyword(s):  
Indian Ocean ◽  
Time Scales ◽  
Mixed Layer ◽  
Heat Budget ◽  
Heat Fluxes ◽  
Temperature Anomalies ◽  
Mixed Layer Temperature ◽  
The Indian Ocean ◽  
The Tropics

Abstract The genesis of mixed layer temperature anomalies across the Indian Ocean are analyzed in terms of the underlying heat budget components. Observational data, for which a seasonal budget can be computed, and a climate model output, which provides improved spatial and temporal coverage for longer time scales, are examined. The seasonal climatology of the model heat budget is broadly consistent with the observational reconstruction, thus providing certain confidence in extending the model analysis to interannual time scales. To identify the dominant heat budget components, covariance analysis is applied based on the heat budget equation. In addition, the role of the heat budget terms on the generation and decay of temperature anomalies is revealed via a novel temperature variance budget approach. The seasonal evolution of the mixed layer temperature is found to be largely controlled by air–sea heat fluxes, except in the tropics where advection and entrainment are important. A distinct shift in the importance and role of certain heat budget components is shown to be apparent in moving from seasonal to interannual time scales. On these longer time scales, advection gains importance in generating and sustaining anomalies over extensive regions, including the trade wind and midlatitude wind regimes. On the other hand, air–sea heat fluxes tend to drive the evolution of thermal anomalies over subtropical regions including off northwestern Australia. In the tropics, however, they limit the growth of anomalies. Entrainment plays a role in the generation and maintenance of interannual anomalies over localized regions, particularly off Sumatra and over the Seychelles–Chagos Thermocline Ridge. It is further shown that the spatial distribution of the role and importance of these terms is related to oceanographic features of the Indian Ocean. Mixed layer depth effects and the influence of model biases are discussed.

scholarly journals Seasonal and Interannual Variations of the SST above the Seychelles Dome

2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 800-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takaaki Yokoi ◽  
Tomoki Tozuka ◽  
Toshio Yamagata
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Seasonal Variation ◽  
Mixed Layer ◽  
Surface Heat Flux ◽  
Surface Heat ◽  
Shortwave Radiation ◽  
Interannual Variations ◽  
Vertical Diffusion ◽  
Horizontal Advection ◽  
Seasonal And Interannual Variations

Abstract The seasonal and interannual variations of the sea surface temperature (SST) above the Seychelles Dome (SD) are investigated using outputs from an OGCM. The SST warms from August to April and cools from May to July. The surface heat flux plays the most important role in the seasonal variation, and it is mostly due to shortwave radiation. The horizontal advection tends to warm the SST in austral winter owing to the southward Ekman heat transport associated with the Indian summer monsoon. The cooling by the vertical turbulent diffusion becomes most effective in austral summer owing to the thin mixed layer during that time. On the interannual time scale, the SST becomes anomalously warm (cool) when the SD is weak (strong). In contrast to the seasonal variation, the vertical diffusion plays the most important role and causes anomalous warming (cooling). This warming (cooling) is due to the anomalously warm (cold) water below the mixed layer as a result of the deeper (shallower) thermocline in response to ocean dynamics. Also, the cooling by the vertical diffusion becomes less (more) efficient, because the mixed layer is anomalously thick (thin). The horizontal advection contributes to the anomalous warming (cooling) due to the anomalous southward (northward) Ekman heat transport. On the other hand, the anomalous surface heat flux tends to cool (warm) the mixed layer, because the warming of the mixed layer by the shortwave radiation becomes less (more) efficient due to the anomalously thick (thin) mixed layer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document